SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1289-1301.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.05.015

• Research Paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

SITE EVALUATION AND VOLCANIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR THE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS OF CHINA

XU Jian-dong1,2, YU Hong-mei1,2, ZHOU Ben-gang2, CUI Wen-ling3, DU Long4, WEI Fei-xiang1,2   

  1. 1. National Observation and Research Station of Changbaishan Volcano, Antu 133613, China;
    2. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
    3. Emergency Management Information Center of Shenzhen City, Shenzhen 518035, China;
    4. China Nuclear Power Design Company Ltd. (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2019-04-28 Revised:2019-07-08 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-12-07

核电厂选址的火山安全评价与灾害评估

许建东1,2, 于红梅1,2, 周本刚2, 崔文玲3, 杜龙4, 魏费翔1,2   

  1. 1. 吉林长白山火山国家野外科学观测研究站, 安图 133613;
    2. 中国地震局地质研究所, 北京 100029;
    3. 深圳市应急指挥信息保障中心, 深圳 518035;
    4. 中国广东核电集团公司, 深圳 518000
  • 作者简介:许建东,男,1962年生,1999年于美国纽约州立大学布法罗分校获构造地质学博士学位,研究员,从事火山地质、火山监测与火山灾害方面的研究工作,E-mail:xujiandong@ies.ac.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA1603)资助。

Abstract: Starting from the 1980's of last century, China has launched the national plan of constructing nuclear power plants along the coastline region in eastern China. Currently, in some of these candidate sites, nuclear facilities have been installed and are in operation, but some other nuclear power plants are still under construction or in site evaluation. In 2012 the Atomic Energy Commission issued the specific guide for volcanic hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations(IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-21), which was prepared under the IAEA's program for safety standards. It supplements and provides recommendations for meeting the requirements for nuclear installations established in the safety requirements publication on site evaluation for nuclear installations in relation to volcanic hazards. To satisfy the safety standards for volcanic hazard, we follow the IAEA SSG-21 guidelines and develop a simple and practical diffusion program in order to evaluate the potential volcanic hazard caused by tephra fallout from the explosive eruptions.
In this practice, we carried out a case study of the active volcanoes in north Hainan Province so as to conduct the probabilistic analysis of the potential volcanic hazard in the surrounding region. The Quaternary volcanism in north Hainan Island, so-called Qiongbei volcanic field is characterized by multi periodic activity, in which the most recent eruption is dated at about 4 000a BP. According to IAEA SSG-21, a capable volcano is one for which both 1)a future eruption or related volcanic event is credible; and 2)such an event has the potential to produce phenomena that may affect a site. Therefore, the Qiongbei volcanic field is capable of producing hazardous phenomena that may reach the potential nuclear power plants around. The input parameters for the simulation of tephra fallout from the future eruption of the Qiongbei volcanic field, such as the size, density and shape of the tephra, the bulk volume and column height, the diffusion parameter P(z), wind direction and intensity, were obtained by field investigation and laboratory analysis. We carried out more than 10000 tephra fallout simulations using a statistical dataset of wind profiles which are obtained from China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System(CMDSSS). Tephra fallout hazard probability maps were constructed for tephra thickness threshold of 1cm. Our results show that the tephra produced by the future large-scale explosive eruption from the Qiongbei volcanic field can affect the area in a range about 250km away from the eruption center.
In summary, the current key technical parameters related to volcanic activity and potential hazards in IAEA/SSG-21 guidelines, such as 10Ma volcanic life cycle and 1×10-7 volcanic disaster screening probability threshold, etc. are based on the volcanic activity characteristics in the volcanic island arc system. In consideration of the relatively low level of volcanic activity compared with volcanic island arc system due to the different tectonic background of volcanism in mainland China, the time scale of volcanic disaster assessment in IAEA SSG-21 guideline is relatively high for volcanoes in mainland China. We suggest that the study of "conceptual model" of volcanic activity should be strengthened in future work to prove that there is no credible potential for future eruptions, so that these volcanoes should be screened out at early stage instead of further evaluation by probabilistic model.

Key words: site evaluation, nuclear power plant, volcanic hazards, IAEA/SSG-21 guideline, probabilistic tephra fallout hazard evaluation

摘要: 核电厂址的选址和核电设施运行过程中的火山安全问题是难以避免的重要议题。在过去的核电选址和安全运行评价的过程中,对火山灾害的考虑仅局限于已知10ka内喷发过的全新世火山。2012年国际原子能机构颁布了IAEA/SSG-21号火山安全标准专用安全导则,基于板块俯冲带火山岛弧系统火山活动的特点,提出在过去10Ma内发生过火山活动的地区在未来也可能发生火山活动,是评估一座火山在未来是否将发生任何火山活动的合理依据。同时,IAEA/SSG-21也针对火山熔岩流、碎屑流和火山灰空降等火山灾害可能影响的范围进行了讨论,并提出了不同火山灾害现象的安全评估范围。文中以IAEA/SSG-21号《核设施厂址火山灾害评估》为技术依据,针对中国火山活动的特点,改进了中国大陆核电厂选址的火山灾害评估技术方法,并以海南琼北火山区为例,编制了适应IAEA/SSG-21导则的火山灰灾害概率图。文中研究成果可为中国大陆核电厂选址和核设施安全运行过程中的潜在火山灾害评估提供技术途径。

关键词: 选址, 核电厂, 火山灾害, IAEA/SSG-21导则, 火山灰灾害概率评估

CLC Number: