This paper presents a comparison of the calendar range of individual paleoearthquake calculated by conventional calibration,Bayesian analysis of series of peat samples as well as depth-age wiggle matching.The results suggest that: (1)The Bayesian analysis provides an excellent means to enhance chronological resolution when applied to a series of radiocarbon dates from sections with clear stratigraphic relationships.Such application can assess systematic errors when combined with independent chronological information,and determine the optimum chronological information for specific events and contexts.(2)The calendar ranges of series of samples collected from the same peat but different sampling thickness were compared with that of depth-age wiggle matching.The result shows that the chronological resolution by depth-age wiggle matching for the peat sample with thickness less than 2cm could achieve less than 100a.Therefore,the condition to obtain a high resolution calendar age is to have 5~6 samples with 0.5~2cm sampling thickness each and the interval of samples is 0.5~1cm.(3)The calendar range of paleoearthquakes constrained by the Markov chain Monte Carlo(MCMC)Bayesian analysis model,which constructs the order of samples according to their position in the strata with series of radiocarbon dates,was compared with calendar range by the conventional method.The results show that Bayesian analysis could obtain high-precision calendar dates for closely spaced samples.(4)Therefore,the calendar interval of the paleoearthquake event on the middle segment of Huaiyuan Fault was inferred as 1340~1114cal a BP(2σ)by the above systematical comparsion.