SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 16-35.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2025.01.002
• Special section: The Dingri MS6.8 earthquake in Xizang • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZOU Jun-jie1,2)(), SHAO Zhi-gang1,2),*(
), HE Hong-lin3), GAO Lu4), XU Yue-yi1,2), DOU Ai-xia1,2), LIANG Ze-yu1,2)
Received:
2025-01-23
Revised:
2025-01-27
Online:
2025-02-20
Published:
2025-02-17
Contact:
SHAO Zhi-gang
邹俊杰1,2)(), 邵志刚1,2),*(
), 何宏林3), 高璐4), 许月怡1,2), 窦爱霞1,2), 梁泽毓1,2)
通讯作者:
邵志刚
作者简介:
邹俊杰, 男, 1991 年生, 副研究员, 主要从事活动构造与地震地质、构造地质学与构造地貌、地震活动性分析与地震中长期预测研究, E-mail: junjiezou_ucas@126.com。
基金资助:
ZOU Jun-jie, SHAO Zhi-gang, HE Hong-lin, GAO Lu, XU Yue-yi, DOU Ai-xia, LIANG Ze-yu. SURFACE RUPTURE INTERPRETATION AND BUILDING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF XIZANG DINGRI MS6.8 EARTHQUAKE ON JANUARY 7, 2025[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2025, 47(1): 16-35.
邹俊杰, 邵志刚, 何宏林, 高璐, 许月怡, 窦爱霞, 梁泽毓. 2025年1月7日西藏定日MS6.8地震地表破裂解译与建筑物震害损毁统计[J]. 地震地质, 2025, 47(1): 16-35.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.dzdz.ac.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2025.01.002
主震信息 | 研究机构 | 震源深度 /km | 震级 /MW | 节面Ⅰ/(°) | 节面Ⅱ/(°) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 | 倾角 | 滑动角 | 走向 | 倾角 | 滑动角 | ||||
2025-01-07, 09:05:16 28.50°N, 87.45°E MS6.8 | 台网中心 | 13 | 6.9 | 334 | 71 | -100 | 182 | 22 | -64 |
预测所 | 26.3 | 7.0 | 352 | 24 | -131 | 216 | 72 | -74 | |
地球所 | 333 | 43 | -112 | 182 | 51 | -71 | |||
北京大学 | 10 | 7.1 | 344 | 45 | -105 | 185 | 47 | -75 | |
USGS | 11.5 | 7.05 | 349 | 42 | -103 | 187 | 49 | -78 | |
GFZ | 14 | 7.1 | 164 | 41 | -102 | 0 | 49 | -79 |
Table1 Focal mechanism parameter information of the Dingri MS6.8 earthquake reported by different institutions
主震信息 | 研究机构 | 震源深度 /km | 震级 /MW | 节面Ⅰ/(°) | 节面Ⅱ/(°) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
走向 | 倾角 | 滑动角 | 走向 | 倾角 | 滑动角 | ||||
2025-01-07, 09:05:16 28.50°N, 87.45°E MS6.8 | 台网中心 | 13 | 6.9 | 334 | 71 | -100 | 182 | 22 | -64 |
预测所 | 26.3 | 7.0 | 352 | 24 | -131 | 216 | 72 | -74 | |
地球所 | 333 | 43 | -112 | 182 | 51 | -71 | |||
北京大学 | 10 | 7.1 | 344 | 45 | -105 | 185 | 47 | -75 | |
USGS | 11.5 | 7.05 | 349 | 42 | -103 | 187 | 49 | -78 | |
GFZ | 14 | 7.1 | 164 | 41 | -102 | 0 | 49 | -79 |
Fig. 1 Map showing geological structure and large earthquake activities in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and surrounding areas(see the location of the MS6.8 Dingri earthquake).
序号 | 名称 | 面积/km2 | 栋数 | 行政区域 总栋数 | 行政区域 总面积/km2 | 地理区域 总栋数 | 地理区域 总面积/km2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 查吉 | 0.0632 | 57 | 措果乡, 544 | 措果乡, 0.97 6 | 近震中区域, 544 | 近震中区域, 0.9726 |
P2 | 嘎热果吉村 | 0.1854 | 96 | ||||
P3 | 吉定村 | 0.1289 | 76 | ||||
P4 | 吉翁村 | 0.0919 | 78 | ||||
P5 | 康穷 | 0.1995 | 89 | ||||
P6 | 拉仓 | 0.0871 | 45 | ||||
P7 | 美朵村 | 0.0562 | 39 | ||||
P8 | 塘日村 | 0.0346 | 19 | ||||
P9 | 雪珠村 | 0.1258 | 45 | ||||
P10 | 杂村 | 0.1225 | 53 | 长所乡, 587 | 长所乡, 1.3021 | 近湖泊区域, 277 | 近湖泊区域, 0.7520 |
P11 | 贡错 | 0.1107 | 29 | ||||
P12 | 嘎布村 | 0.1477 | 53 | ||||
P13 | 社波 | 0.0296 | 16 | ||||
P14 | 强嘎村 | 0.1304 | 42 | ||||
P15 | 通来村 | 0.0679 | 29 | ||||
P16 | 玉白村 | 0.1090 | 36 | ||||
P17 | 培玛拉木村 | 0.0342 | 19 | ||||
P18 | 茶江村 | 0.1415 | 72 | 近基岩山区, 364 | 近基岩山区, 0.6530 | ||
P19 | 森嘎村 | 0.1462 | 79 | ||||
P20 | 念朵 | 0.0158 | 12 | ||||
P21 | 康萨 | 0.0157 | 18 | ||||
P22 | 边觉 | 0.0189 | 15 | ||||
P23 | 央米 | 0.0271 | 24 | ||||
P24 | 班久村 | 0.0285 | 12 | ||||
P25 | 乃琼 | 0.0940 | 55 | ||||
P26 | 古荣村 | 0.0624 | 23 | ||||
P27 | 颠结 | 0.0197 | 7 | 曲洛乡,54 | 曲洛乡,0.1029 | ||
P28 | 措娃村 | 0.0832 | 47 |
Table2 Disaster impact on the main administrative villages around the earthquake epicenter and surface rupture
序号 | 名称 | 面积/km2 | 栋数 | 行政区域 总栋数 | 行政区域 总面积/km2 | 地理区域 总栋数 | 地理区域 总面积/km2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 查吉 | 0.0632 | 57 | 措果乡, 544 | 措果乡, 0.97 6 | 近震中区域, 544 | 近震中区域, 0.9726 |
P2 | 嘎热果吉村 | 0.1854 | 96 | ||||
P3 | 吉定村 | 0.1289 | 76 | ||||
P4 | 吉翁村 | 0.0919 | 78 | ||||
P5 | 康穷 | 0.1995 | 89 | ||||
P6 | 拉仓 | 0.0871 | 45 | ||||
P7 | 美朵村 | 0.0562 | 39 | ||||
P8 | 塘日村 | 0.0346 | 19 | ||||
P9 | 雪珠村 | 0.1258 | 45 | ||||
P10 | 杂村 | 0.1225 | 53 | 长所乡, 587 | 长所乡, 1.3021 | 近湖泊区域, 277 | 近湖泊区域, 0.7520 |
P11 | 贡错 | 0.1107 | 29 | ||||
P12 | 嘎布村 | 0.1477 | 53 | ||||
P13 | 社波 | 0.0296 | 16 | ||||
P14 | 强嘎村 | 0.1304 | 42 | ||||
P15 | 通来村 | 0.0679 | 29 | ||||
P16 | 玉白村 | 0.1090 | 36 | ||||
P17 | 培玛拉木村 | 0.0342 | 19 | ||||
P18 | 茶江村 | 0.1415 | 72 | 近基岩山区, 364 | 近基岩山区, 0.6530 | ||
P19 | 森嘎村 | 0.1462 | 79 | ||||
P20 | 念朵 | 0.0158 | 12 | ||||
P21 | 康萨 | 0.0157 | 18 | ||||
P22 | 边觉 | 0.0189 | 15 | ||||
P23 | 央米 | 0.0271 | 24 | ||||
P24 | 班久村 | 0.0285 | 12 | ||||
P25 | 乃琼 | 0.0940 | 55 | ||||
P26 | 古荣村 | 0.0624 | 23 | ||||
P27 | 颠结 | 0.0197 | 7 | 曲洛乡,54 | 曲洛乡,0.1029 | ||
P28 | 措娃村 | 0.0832 | 47 |
Fig. 10 Schematic model of the seismogenic structure, rupture characteristics, affected villages, and dangerous segments of the MS6.8 earthquake in Dingri, Xizang Autonomous Region, on January 7, 2025.
Fig. 11 Schematic model of stress release characteristics of the Quluo-Dengmecuo-Guojia-Dingjie normal fault system in the southern segment of the Shenzha-Dingjie Rift.
[1] |
曹忠权, 邓桂英, 张军, 等. 1999. 西藏申扎构造区近期地震活动特征[J]. 高原地震, 11(1): 62—66.
|
|
|
[2] |
韩同林. 1986. 试论西藏活动构造带及其对地震的控制作用[J]. 地质学报, 60(4): 332—338.
|
|
|
[3] |
韩同林. 1989. 试论西藏地震带及地震烈度的区域划分[J]. 中国地质科学院院报, 11(1): 53—61.
|
|
|
[4] |
黄婷, 吴中海, 韩帅, 等. 2024. 西藏日喀则地区的活断层基本特征及地震灾害潜在风险评估[J]. 地震科学进展, 54(10): 696—711.
|
|
|
[5] |
李佳怡, 徐岳仁, 张军龙, 等. 2024. 基于多源卫星影像的同震地表破裂带迹象变化识别: 以2001年昆仑山口西 MS8.1 地震为例[J]. 地震学报, 46(6): 982—1001.
|
|
|
[6] |
田婷婷, 吴中海. 2023. 西藏申扎-定结裂谷南段丁木错正断层的最新史前大地震事件及其地震地质意义[J]. 地质论评, 69(S1): 53—55.
|
|
|
[7] |
吴章明, 曹忠权, 申屠炳明, 等. 1990. 西藏申扎南发现地震地表破裂[J]. 地震地质, 12(4): 317—318.
|
|
|
[8] |
吴章明, 曹忠权, 申屠炳明, 等. 1994. 西藏中部的发震构造[J]. 中国地震, 10(1): 19—27.
|
|
|
[9] |
徐心悦. 2019. 藏南申扎-定结断裂系卡达正断裂晚第四纪活动性及其环境效应[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所.
|
|
|
[10] |
张进江. 2007. 北喜马拉雅及藏南伸展构造综述[J]. 地质通报, 26(6): 639—649.
|
|
|
[11] |
张进江, 丁林. 2003. 青藏高原EW向伸展及其地质意义[J]. 地质科学, 38(2): 179—189.
|
|
|
[12] |
张进江, 郭磊, 丁林. 2002. 申扎-定结正断层体系中、南段构造特征及其与藏南拆离系的关系[J]. 科学通报, 47(10): 738—743.
|
|
[1] | SHI Feng, LIANG Ming-jian, LUO Quan-xing, QIAO Jun-xiang, ZHANG Da, WANG Xin, YI Wen-xing, ZHANG Jia-wei, ZHANG Ying-feng, ZHANG Hui-ping, LI Tao, LI An. SEISMOGENIC FAULT AND COSEISMIC SURFACE DEFORMATION OF THE DINGRI MS6.8 EARTHQUAKE IN XIZANG, CHINA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2025, 47(1): 1-15. |
[2] | YANG Jian-wen, JIN Ming-pei, YE Beng, LI Zhen-ling, LI Qing. SOURCE RUPTURE MECHANISM AND STRESS CHANGES TO THE ADJACENT AREA OF JANUARY 7, 2025, MS6.8 DINGRI EARTHQUAKE, XIZANG, CHINA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2025, 47(1): 36-48. |
[3] | WEI Ben-yong, ZHANG Yu-man, SHI Feng, QIAO Jun-xiang, WANG Xin, ZHANG Da. ANALYSIS OF BUILDING DAMAGE AND CASUALTIES OF THE 2025 DINGRI MS6.8 EARTHQUAKE IN XIZANG BASED ON FIELD INVESTIGATION [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2025, 47(1): 64-79. |
[4] | LIANG Ming-jian, DONG Yun-xi, ZUO Hong, DAI You-lin, XIAO Ben-fu, LIAO Cheng, TAN Ling, WANG Yu-wei, LI Xiang, TANG Cai-cheng, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Hui-ping, MENG Ling-yuan, SU Jin-rong, WU Wei-wei, LI Chuan-you, YAN Mei. SURFACE DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSES OF THE DENGMECUO SEGMENT IN THE XIZANG DINGRI MS6.8 EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2025, 47(1): 80-89. |
[5] | ZHANG Wei-heng, ZHANG Dong-sheng, CHEN Jie, TIAN Qin-jian, HE Wan-tong. THE RANGE OF DEFORMED ZONE BASED BY ACTIVE FAULT OFFSET BASED ON STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE RUPTURE ZONE WIDTH [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2025, 47(1): 345-366. |
[6] | NIU Peng-fei, HAN Zhu-jun, GUO Peng, LI Ke-chang, LÜ Li-xing. THE DISASTER MECHANISM OF THE MS6.9 EARTHQUAKE IN MENYUAN, QINGHAI PROVINCE, 2022 [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2024, 46(4): 761-782. |
[7] | HAN Long-fei, LIU-ZENG Jing, YAO Wen-qian, WANG Wen-xin, LIU Xiao-li, GAO Yun-peng, SHAO Yan-xiu, LI Jin-yang. DETAILED MAPPING OF THE SURFACE RUPTURE NEAR THE EPICENTER SEGMENT OF THE 2021 MADOI MW7.4 EARTHQUAKE AND DISCUSSION ON DISTRIBUTED RUPTURE IN THE STEP-OVER [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(2): 484-505. |
[8] | LIANG Zi-han, WEI Zhan-yu, ZHUANG Qi-tian, SUN Wen, HE Hong-lin. SEGMENTATION OF SURFACE RUPTURE AND OFFSETS CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FUYUN M8.0 EARTHQUAKE BASED ON HIGH-RESOLUTION TOPOGRAPHIC DATA [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(6): 1507-1523. |
[9] | YAO Sheng-hai, GAI Hai-long, YIN Xiang, LI Xin. THE BASIC CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPICAL PHENOMENA OF THE SURFACE RUPTURE ZONE OF THE MADUO MS7.4 EARTHQUAKE IN QINGHAI [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND EGOLOGY, 2021, 43(5): 1060-1072. |
[10] | LIANG Ming-jian, YANG Yao, DU Fang, GONG Yue, SUN Wei, ZHAO Min, HE Qiang. LATE QUATERNARY ACTIVITY OF THE CENTRAL SEGMENT OF THE DARI FAULT AND RESTUDY OF THE SURFACE RUPTURE ZONE OF THE 1947 M73/4 DARI EARTHQUAKE, QINGHAI PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(3): 703-714. |
[11] | LI Zhi-min, REN Zhi-kun, LIU Jin-rui, HA Guang-hao, LI Zheng-fang, WANG Bo, WANG Lin-jian. NEW DISCOVERY OF RESHUI-TAOSTUO RIVER FAULT IN DULAN, QINGHAI PROVINCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2020, 42(1): 18-32. |
[12] | WU Xi-yan, XU Xi-wei, YU Gui-hua, CHENG Jia, CHEN Gui-hua, AN Yan-fen, WANG Qi-xin. MAP PREPARATION OF EARTHQUAKE SURFACE RUPTURES IN THE NATIONAL EXPERIMENTAL FIELD OF EARTHQUAKE MONITORING AND PREDICTION IN SICHUAN AND YUNNAN PROVINCE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2018, 40(1): 27-41. |
[13] | XU Xi-wei, GUO Ting-ting, LIU Shao-zhuo, YU Gui-hua, CHEN Gui-hua, WU Xi-yan. DISCUSSION ON ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH SETBACK DISTANCE FROM ACTIVE FAULT [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(3): 477-502. |
[14] | XU Xi-wei, TAN Xi-bin, WU Guo-dong, CHEN Jian-bo, SHEN Jun, FANG Wei, SONG He-ping. SURFACE RUPTURE FEATURES OF THE 2008 YUTIAN MS 7.3 EARTHQUAKE AND ITS TECTONIC NATURE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2011, 33(2): 462-471. |
[15] | WANG Lin, TIAN Qin-jian, MA Bao-qi, ZHANG Shi-min, HAO Kai, YU Jian-qiang. RESEARCH OF CUMULATIVE VERTICAL SLIP OF THE SEISMOGENIC FAULTS OF THE MS 8.0 WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE [J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2008, 30(4): 1012-1022. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||