The 1739 M8.0 Pingluo earthquake is the largest destructive earthquake occurring on the Yinchuan plain in history. However, there are different understandings about the seismogenic structure of this earthquake. In this paper, we re-evaluate the seismogenic structure of the 1739 M8.0 Pingluo earthquake after our investigation and detailed measurement of the seismic dislocations on the Great Wall and the surrounding tableland, and also the latest results of trenching, drilling, and shallow seismic exploration are considered as well. The results show that the latest rupture event of the Helanshan piedmont fault occurred after 600~700a BP, the Great Wall built in Ming Dynasty about 500 years ago was faulted by Helanshan piedmont fault. Although the distribution of Yinchuan buried fault coincides much with the distribution of the meizoseismal area, the fault's northward extending stopped at Yaofu town, and its Holocene active segment is less than 36km in length. The latest surface rupture occurred shortly before 3400a BP. The 1739 Pingluo earthquake did not rupture the ground surface along the Yinchuan buried fault. The presence of growth strata and the non-synchronous deformation of strata near the fault demonstrate that Yinchuan buried fault did not rupture at all or there was rupture but absorbed by the loose layers in the 1739 Pingluo earthquake. Therefore, the Helanshan piedmont fault is the seismogenic structure of the 1739 M8 Pingluo earthquake, rather than the Yinchuan buried fault, and there is no synchronous rupture between two faults. The difference of location between the seismogenic structures and the meizoseismal area of the Pingluo M8 earthquake may be caused by the factors, such as fault dip, groundwater depth, basin structure, loose formations, the degree of residents gathering, so on. The phenomenon that the meizoseismal area shifts to the center of the basin of earthquake generated by faulting of a listric fault on the boundary of the basin should be paid more attention to in seismic fortification in similar areas.
Based on the discussions on the basic ideas, methods and procedures for detecting buried faults and taking the example of Luhuatai buried faults in Yinchuan Basin, the paper introduces in detail the multi-means, multi-level detection methods for gradually determining the accurate location of faults. Multi-means refer to the technical methods such as shallow seismic exploration, composite drilling section, trenching, dating of sedimentary strata samples and calculation of upward continuation of fault's upper breakpoints, etc. Multi-levels refer to gradually determining accurate location of fault at different levels with the above means. Results of shallow seismic exploration reveal that the Luhuatai buried fault has a strike of NNE in general, dip SEE, with the dip angle between 73° to 78°. Geometrically, the fault consists of a main fault and a small north-segment fault in plane. The main fault runs along the NNE direction from Xixia District of Yinchuan City, passing through Jinshan Township to Chonggang Township, and there is a 4km or so intermittent zone between the main fault and the small north-segment fault. The small north-segment fault is 9km long, distributed between the north of Chonggang Township to the south of Shizuishan City. According to dating of sediments sampled from drill holes, the main fault can be further divided into the southern segment and the northern segment. The southern segment of Luhuatai buried fault is active in Pleistocene, while the northern segment is active in Holocene. Shallow seismic exploration can detect the upper breakpoint of fault deeper than drilling or trenching does. If simply connecting the vertical projections of these breakpoints on the surface, there is a certain bias of fault strike. To this end, we did accurate location for the Holocene active northern segment of Luhuatai buried fault, in which upward continuation calculation is done based on the fault dip to match the upper breakpoint of fault obtained from shallow seismic exploration with the depth of the upper breakpoints obtained from drilling. Through the accurate location of the fault, we get the geometric distribution, occurrence and segmentation of activity of Luhuatai buried fault at the near-surface. Our results provide reliable basis for the safety distance from active faults for engineering construction projects in the Luhuatai buried fault area of Shizuishan City. The methods discussed in this paper for accurate location of buried active faults are of reference value for buried fault exploration in other similar cities or regions.
LiDAR, as a newly developed surveying technology in recent decades, has been widely used in engineering survey, protection of cultural relics and topographic measurement, and it has also been gradually introduced to studies of tectonic activities. Although the digital photography technology has been used in the study of palaeoearthquake, the information would be still acquired by traditional geological sketch from trenches. Due to the limitation of photography itself, it is difficult to overcome the distortion of information. With its high information content, accuracy, convenience, safety and easy operation, LiDAR, as a new technology, broadens the access to data and information for palaeoearthquake study.
Luhuatai Fault is one of the important buried tectonics in Yinchuan Basin.Based on the results of shallow seismic exploration,we conducted composite drilling section exploration and dating of the samples of borehole.Some useful data of the fault were obtained,such as the depth of upper breaking point,the latest activity age,displacement in late Quaternary,and slip rates,etc.This study shows that the activity is different between the north and south segment along Luhuatai Fault.The north segment is a Holocene fault,while the south segment is a late mid-Pleistocene fault. From north to south along the north segment of Luhuatai Fault,the activity has enhanced,and the faulting is stronger in late Pleistocene than Holocene.
In this paper,an optimized drilling exploration method,the doubling section method,was summarized after many composite drilling section explorations of buried active fault in urban areas.Operation steps of this method are as follows: Firstly,drill a borehole at each of the two ends of the drilling section to make sure that fault is between the two boreholes,then,drill the third borehole at the middle of the two holes; and secondly,confirm again the segment where the fault is and drill the next borehole in the middle of it.By repeating the similar practice,the accurate location of fault can be constrained progressively.Meanwhile,this paper also uses a quantitative indicator,the key horizon gradient between two boreholes,instead of stratigraphic throw,to determine the location of buried fault and puts forward two criterions: 1)the fault is located between two boreholes if the key horizon gradients between these two boreholes are positive and increase with depth; and 2)the fault is located where the key horizon gradients between two boreholes increase obviously relative to the previous values and that of adjacent segments,besides the increase with depth.While in contrast,the key horizon gradient in a normal fault segment decreases obviously.Application cases show that the method can determine precisely the location of buried active fault.