Active block boundaries represent areas where significant crustal stress accumulates, leading to concentrated tectonic deformation and frequent seismic activity. These boundaries are crucial for understanding the patterns of strong earthquakes within mainland China. The China Seismic Experimental Site, located in the Sichuan-Yunnan region, is a key area of tectonic deformation caused by the collision and convergence of the Indian and Eurasian plates. This region plays a vital role in transferring tectonic stress between western China and adjacent plates.
This comprehensive study analyzes the integrity, three-dimensional characteristics, hierarchy, and tectonic activity of blocks within the Sichuan-Yunnan region, following established schemes and criteria for defining active block boundaries. After detailed research, the major active fault zones in the region have been divided into three primary active block boundary zones and sixteen secondary boundary zones.
A new reference scheme was developed by considering several factors, including the historical distribution of strong earthquakes, the hierarchical patterns of earthquake frequency and magnitude, spatial variations in present-day deformation as revealed by GNSS data, and deep crustal differences indicated by gravity data and velocity structures. The Jinshajiang-Honghe Fault, Ganzi-Yushu-Xianshuihe-Anninghe-Zemuhe-Xiaojiang Fault, and Longmenshan Fault are identified as the primary active block boundary zones, while faults such as the Lijiang-Xiaojinhe, Nantinghe, and Longriba faults are classified as secondary boundary zones.
Through an integrated analysis of seismic activity, current deformation patterns, fault sizes, deep crustal structures, and paleoseismic data, the study estimates that the primary boundary zones have the potential to generate earthquakes of magnitude 7.5 or greater, while the secondary boundary zones could produce earthquakes of magnitude 6.5 or greater.
The expansion of geophysical exploration, including shallow and deep earth data, has allowed for a transition in the study of active tectonics from surface-focused to depth-focused, from qualitative to quantitative, and from two-dimensional to three-dimensional analysis. By integrating multiple data sources, i.e. regional geology, geophysics, seismicity, and large-scale deformation measurements, this study presents a more refined delineation of active blocks in the Sichuan-Yunnan region.
The new delineation scheme provides a scientific basis for future mechanical simulations of interactions between active blocks in the Sichuan-Yunnan Experimental Site. It also offers a framework for assessing the probability of strong earthquakes and evaluating seismic hazards. The purpose of this study is to re-analyze and refine the delineation of active block boundaries using high-resolution, coordinated data while building on previous research.
In summary, the Sichuan-Yunnan region’s primary fault zones are divided into three primary and sixteen secondary active block boundary zones. The study concludes that primary boundary zones are capable of generating magnitude 7.5 or greater earthquakes, while secondary zones can produce magnitude 6.5 or greater earthquakes. While the current block delineation scheme offers a valuable foundation, further discussion and refinement of certain secondary boundary zones are needed as detection and observational data improve. This study provides an essential framework for analyzing the dynamic interactions between active blocks, identifying seismogenic environments, and assessing seismic risks in the Sichuan-Yunnan region.
Bedrock normal fault scarps, as classical topographic features and geomorphological markers along mountain range fronts, form in consolidated bedrock due to faulting in extensional settings. They generally preserve more complete records of paleo-earthquakes than fault scarps in unconsolidated sediments. With the development of technologies such as fault surface morphology measurement and terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide dating, bedrock fault planes have become a nice object for paleo-earthquake study in bedrock areas. The reconstruction of paleo-seismic history from a bedrock fault scarp in terms of the times, co-seismic slips and ages by a combination of quantitative morphological analysis, TCNs dating and other physical/chemical index has been proven feasible by several previous studies.
However, this success heavily relies on a suitable site selection along the bedrock fault scarp because erosional processes can exhume the bedrock fault surface, and the sedimentary processes can bury the bedrock fault surface. Namely, non-tectonic factors such as gully erosion, sediment burial, and anthropogenic activity make bedrock fault planes difficult to record and preserve paleo-seismic information.
Therefore, to successfully extract paleo-seismic information from the bedrock area, it is necessary to select suitable study points along the bedrock fault scarp in advance. Traditional survey and mapping methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, and it is difficult to understand bedrock fault scarps. The resolution of satellite images cannot obtain the fine structure of bedrock fault scarps. Small unmanned aerial vehicle(sUAV), combined with Structure-from-Motion(SfM)photogrammetry has emerged over the last decade. It is used as an established workflow in acquiring topographic data by filling the spatial gap between traditional ground-based surveys and satellite remote sensing images. As a low-altitude photogrammetry technology, it can quickly obtain high-precision three-dimensional surface structures of bedrock fault scarps.
In this paper, taking the Majiayao bedrock fault scarp at the northern foot of Liulengshan in Shanxi Rift as an example, the high-precision and three-dimensional topographic data of the bedrock fault was obtained by using sUAV combined with SfM photogrammetry technology. The high-resolution and high-precision images of tectonic landforms can be obtained conveniently and efficiently by sUAV survey. The sUAV-obtained photos can be further processed by the SfM photogrammetry for generating a digital 3D structure of the bedrock fault scarp with true or shaded color.
The non-tectonic factors such as rock collapse, sediment burial, and gully erosion along the bedrock fault scarp are identified by interpreting the 3D model of the bedrock fault scarp. The profile shape characteristics of the erosion, burial and tectonic fault scarps are summarized through fine geomorphological interpretation and fault profile analysis. For the erosion profile, the hanging wall slope is down-concave, showing that the fault surface below the ground surface has been partially exposed. For the bury profile, the hanging wall slope shows an obvious concave-up shape, indicating that the lower part of the bedrock fault surface has been partially buried by the colluvium. For the tectonic profile, the hanging wall slope shows a smooth and stable slope, showing the exhumation of bedrock fault scarp is controlled purely by tectonics. Finally, the study sites suitable for paleo-earthquake study on bedrock fault surfaces were selected, showing the important role of sUAV aerial survey technology in the selection of paleo-earthquake study sites in bedrock areas.
This study illustrates that based on the high-precision three-dimensional surface structure of the bedrock fault plane from sUAV aerial survey, the existence of non-tectonic factors such as gully erosion, sedimentary burial and bedrock collapse can be clearly identified. These non-tectonic sites can be excluded when selecting suitable sites for paleo-earthquake study indoors. The shape analysis of bedrock fault scarp is also helpful to determine whether the bedrock fault surface is modified by surface process and suitable for paleo-seismic study. The sUAV aerial survey can play an important role in paleoseismic research in the bedrock area, which can accurately select the study points suitable for further paleo-seismic work in the bedrock area.
On February 3, 2020, an earthquake with a magnitude MS5.1 occurred in Qingbaijiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province. The epicenter is located in the north segment of the Longquan Shan fault zone in the western Sichuan Basin. This fault zone locates in the forebulge of the foreland thrust belt of the Longmen Shan fault zone in the southeast margin of Tibetan plateau and is the east boundary of the western Sichuan foreland basin at the same time, so it has special tectonic significance. There are two branch faults in the north segment of Longquan Shan fault zone, which are distributed on the east and west sides, respectively, and the epicenter distance is almost similar to the two faults. At present, the seismogenic fault, earthquake genesis and dynamic source of the earthquake are not clear. As this earthquake is a moderate earthquake event, it is usually very uncertain to interpret it with structural geological or seismological data alone. Therefore, this study attempts to carry out a comprehensive study on the Qingbaijiang MS5.1 earthquake by performing cross fusion of multi-disciplinary data, adopting the multi-constraint method from geophysics, seismology and geodesy, and combining with structural geology and fault related fold theory. We collected three seismic reflection profiles located in the north segment of the fault zone to reveal the basic structural characteristics underground. The detachment layer in the middle-lower Triassic Jialingjiang-Leikoupo formation is developed at the depth of 4~6km below the anticline, and two obvious opposite thrust faults are developed on the two wings of the anticline, which are breakthrough fault-propagation fold deformation. The east branch thrust fault gradually rises from the detachment layer of Leikoupo formation to the surface, and the west branch thrust fault is exposed on the surface and connected with the detachment layer downward. The waveform data recorded by 14 fixed stations within 150km from the epicenter of Sichuan seismic network are studied and collected. The focal depth, focal mechanism and moment magnitude of the earthquake are obtained by using CAP waveform inversion method. The focal depth is 5km, indicating that the earthquake is related to shallow fault activity, the focal mechanism is 18°/32°/100° for nodal plane I and 186°/59°/84° for nodal plane Ⅱ, the moment magnitude is 4.64. Using the travel time data of P and S seismic phases, the Qingbaijiang earthquake sequence is relocated by HypoSAT location method and double difference location method. It is concluded that the epicenter position of the main earthquake is 30.73°N and 104.48°E. From February 4 to June 26, 2020, a total of 61 aftershock events were relocated, with magnitude 0≤ML≤3.0 and depth ranging from near surface to 15km. The 61 aftershocks spread about 5km in the NW-SE direction and have conjugate distribution in NW and NE directions, which may be related to the small thrust fault developed on the east branch of Longquan Shan Fault. Aftershocks have a good linear distribution in NE direction, which is closer to the east branch of the north segment of Longquan Shan fault zone, and the distribution direction is also consistent with the fault strike. On the seismic reflection profile, the aftershock projection is densely distributed along the east branch fault. The occurrence of the east branch fault is consistent with the focal mechanism nodal plane I, which is a low angle thrust fault dipping to NW. The InSAR coseismic deformation field near the epicenter is extracted by using the Sentinel data of orbit 55 and orbit 62 collected from ESA, including 8 single view complex images of orbit 55 and orbit 62, respectively. The surface deformation caused by this earthquake is in the middle of two thrust faults, and the maximum coseismic deformation can reach 4cm. The deformation caused by the earthquake is uplifting in the northwest and depressing in the southeast of the epicenter. The largest depression is located between the epicenter and the east branch fault. The thrust activity of the east branch fault is more in line with the above surface deformation characteristics. In this study, the seismotectonics of the 2020 Qingbaijiang MS5.1 earthquake is analyzed in detail using multi-disciplinary and multi-constraint method. The east branch fault in the north segment of the fault zone is determined as the seismogenic fault, and the possible seismic dynamic background is discussed. This result provides a scientific basis for fault activity analysis and seismic risk assessment in Longquan Shan area and has a great significance for further exploring the expansion and growth of Longmen Shan in the southeast margin of Tibetan plateau toward Sichuan Basin.
On 20 April 2013, a destructive earthquake, the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake, occurred in the southern segment of the Longmenshan Fault zone, the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau in Sichuan, China. This earthquake did not produce surface rupture zone, and its seismogenic structure is not clear. Due to the lack of Quaternary sediment in the southern segment of the Longmenshan fault zone and the fact that fault outcrops are not obvious, there is a shortage of data concerning the tectonic activity of this region. This paper takes the upper reaches of the Qingyijiang River as the research target, which runs through the Yanjing-Wulong Fault, Dachuan-Shuangshi Fault and Lushan Basin, with an attempt to improve the understanding of the tectonic activity of the southern segment of the Longmenshan fault zone and explore the seismogenic structure of Lushan earthquake. In the paper, the important morphological features and tectonic evolution of this area were reviewed. Then, field sites were selected to provide profiles of different parts of the Qingyijiang River terraces, and the longitudinal profile of the terraces of the Qingyijiang River in the south segment of the Longmenshan fault zone was reconstructed based on geological interpretation of high-resolution remote sensing images, continuous differential GPS surveying along the terrace surfaces, geomorphic field evidence, and correlation of the fluvial terraces. The deformed longitudinal profile reveals that the most active tectonics during the late Quaternary in the south segment of the Longmenshan Fault zone are the Yanjing-Wulong Fault and the Longmenshan range front anticline. The vertical thrust rate of the Yanjing-Wulong Fault is nearly 0.6~1.2mm/a in the late Quaternary. The tectonic activity of the Longmenshan range front anticline may be higher than the Yanjing-Wulong Fault. Combined with the relocations of aftershocks and other geophysical data about the Lushan earthquake, we found that the seismogenic structure of the Lushan earthquake is the range front blind thrust and the back thrust fault, and the pop-up structure between the two faults controls the surface deformation of the range front anticline.
The seismogenic structure of the Lushan earthquake has remained in suspensed until now. Several faults or tectonics, including basal slipping zone, unknown blind thrust fault and piedmont buried fault, etc, are all considered as the possible seismogenic structure. This paper tries to make some new insights into this unsolved problem. Firstly, based on the data collected from the dynamic seismic stations located on the southern segment of the Longmenshan fault deployed by the Institute of Earthquake Science from 2008 to 2009 and the result of the aftershock relocation and the location of the known faults on the surface, we analyze and interpret the deep structures. Secondly, based on the terrace deformation across the main earthquake zone obtained from the dirrerential GPS meaturement of topography along the Qingyijiang River, combining with the geological interpretation of the high resolution remote sensing image and the regional geological data, we analyze the surface tectonic deformation. Furthermore, we combined the data of the deep structure and the surface deformation above to construct tectonic deformation model and research the seismogenic structure of the Lushan earthquake. Preliminarily, we think that the deformation model of the Lushan earthquake is different from that of the northern thrust segment ruptured in the Wenchuan earthquake due to the dip angle of the fault plane. On the southern segment, the main deformation is the compression of the footwall due to the nearly vertical fault plane of the frontal fault, and the new active thrust faults formed in the footwall. While on the northern segment, the main deformation is the thrusting of the hanging wall due to the less steep fault plane of the central fault. An active anticline formed on the hanging wall of the new active thrust fault, and the terrace surface on this anticline have deformed evidently since the Quaterary, and the latest activity of this anticline caused the Lushan earthquake, so the newly formed active thrust fault is probably the seismogenic structure of the Lushan earthquake. Huge displacement or tectonic deformation has been accumulated on the fault segment curved towards southeast from the Daxi country to the Taiping town during a long time, and the release of the strain and the tectonic movement all concentrate on this fault segment. The Lushan earthquake is just one event during the whole process of tectonic evolution, and the newly formed active thrust faults in the footwall may still cause similar earthquake in the future.