On February 6, 2023, two destructive earthquakes struck southern and central Turkey and northern and western Syria. The epicenter of the first event(MW7.8)was 37km west-northwest of Gaziantep. The earthquake had a maximum Mercalli intensity of Ⅻ around the epicenter and in Antakya. It was followed by a MW7.7 earthquake nine hours later. This earthquake was centered 95km north-northeast from the first one. There was widespread damage and tens of thousands of fatalities. In response to these catastrophic events, in March 2023, a seismic scientific expedition led by China Earthquake Administration(CEA)was promptly organized to investigate the surface ruptures caused by these earthquakes. Here, we focus on the surface ruptures of the second earthquake, known as the Elbistan earthquake. The post-earthquake field survey revealed that the Elbistan earthquake occurred on the East Anatolian fault zone's northern branch(the Cardak Fault). This event resulted in forming a main surface rupture zone approximately 140km long and a secondary fault rupture zone approximately 20km long, which is nearly perpendicular to the main rupture.
We combined the interpretation of high-resolution satellite imagery and geomorphic investigations along the fault to determine the fault geometry and kinematics of the second earthquake event. The Elbistan earthquake formed a main surface rupture zone approximately 140km long, which strikes in an east-west direction along the Cardak Fault. The main rupture zone starts from Göksun in the west and extends predominantly eastward until the western end of the Sürgü Fault. It then propagates northeast along the southern segment of the Malatya fault zone. The entire Cardak Fault and the Malatya fault zone's southern segment are considered seismic structures for this earthquake. The overall surface rupture zone exhibits a linear and continuous distribution. Secondary ruptures show a combination of left-lateral strike-slip or left-lateral oblique-thrust deformation. Along the rupture zone, a series of en echelon fractures, moletracks, horizontal fault striations, and numerous displaced piercing markers, such as mountain ridges, wheat fields, terraces, fences, roads, and wheel ruts, indicate the predominance of pure left-lateral strike-slip motion for most sections. The maximum measured horizontal displacement is(7.6±0.3)m. According to the empirical relationship between the seismic moment magnitude of strike-slip faulting earthquakes and the length of surface rupture(SRL), a main rupture zone of 140km in length corresponds to a moment magnitude of approximately 7.6. Based on the relationship between the seismic moment magnitude and the maximum coseismic displacement, a maximum coseismic displacement of(7.6±0.3)m corresponds to a moment magnitude of about 7.5. The magnitudes derived from the two empirical relationships are essentially consistent, and they also agree with the moment magnitude provided by the USGS. Besides the main surface rupture zone, a secondary fault rupture zone extends nearly north-south direction for approximately 20km long. Unfortunately, due to the limited time and traffic problem, we did not visit this north-south-trending secondary fault rupture zone.
According to the summary of the history of earthquakes, it is evident that the main surface rupture zone has only recorded one earthquake in history, the 1544 MS6.8 earthquake, which indicates significantly less seismic activity compared to the main East Anatolian Fault. Moreover, the “earthquake doublet” will inevitably significantly impact the stress state and seismic hazard of other faults in the region. Seismic activity in this area remain at a relatively high level for years or even decades to come. The east-west striking fault, which has not been identified on the published active fault maps at the western end of the surface rupture zone, and the north-east striking Savrun Fault, which did not rupture this time, will experience destructive earthquakes in the future. It remains unknown why the east-west striking rupture did not propagate to the Sürgü Fault this time. More detailed paleoearthquake studies are needed to identify whether it is due to insufficient energy accumulation or because this section acts as a barrier. If the Sürgü Fault, about 40km long, was to rupture entirely in the future, the magnitude could reach 7 based on the empirical relationship.
Considering the distribution of historical earthquakes along the East Anatolian fault zone, as well as the geometric distribution of the surface ruptures from the recent “earthquake doublet” and the surrounding active faults, it is believed that the future earthquake hazards in the northeastern segment of the East Anatolian fault zone, the northern segment of the Dead Sea Fault, and the Malatya Fault deserve special attention.
The 1739 M8.0 Pingluo earthquake is the largest destructive earthquake occurring on the Yinchuan plain in history. However, there are different understandings about the seismogenic structure of this earthquake. In this paper, we re-evaluate the seismogenic structure of the 1739 M8.0 Pingluo earthquake after our investigation and detailed measurement of the seismic dislocations on the Great Wall and the surrounding tableland, and also the latest results of trenching, drilling, and shallow seismic exploration are considered as well. The results show that the latest rupture event of the Helanshan piedmont fault occurred after 600~700a BP, the Great Wall built in Ming Dynasty about 500 years ago was faulted by Helanshan piedmont fault. Although the distribution of Yinchuan buried fault coincides much with the distribution of the meizoseismal area, the fault's northward extending stopped at Yaofu town, and its Holocene active segment is less than 36km in length. The latest surface rupture occurred shortly before 3400a BP. The 1739 Pingluo earthquake did not rupture the ground surface along the Yinchuan buried fault. The presence of growth strata and the non-synchronous deformation of strata near the fault demonstrate that Yinchuan buried fault did not rupture at all or there was rupture but absorbed by the loose layers in the 1739 Pingluo earthquake. Therefore, the Helanshan piedmont fault is the seismogenic structure of the 1739 M8 Pingluo earthquake, rather than the Yinchuan buried fault, and there is no synchronous rupture between two faults. The difference of location between the seismogenic structures and the meizoseismal area of the Pingluo M8 earthquake may be caused by the factors, such as fault dip, groundwater depth, basin structure, loose formations, the degree of residents gathering, so on. The phenomenon that the meizoseismal area shifts to the center of the basin of earthquake generated by faulting of a listric fault on the boundary of the basin should be paid more attention to in seismic fortification in similar areas.
LiDAR, as a newly developed surveying technology in recent decades, has been widely used in engineering survey, protection of cultural relics and topographic measurement, and it has also been gradually introduced to studies of tectonic activities. Although the digital photography technology has been used in the study of palaeoearthquake, the information would be still acquired by traditional geological sketch from trenches. Due to the limitation of photography itself, it is difficult to overcome the distortion of information. With its high information content, accuracy, convenience, safety and easy operation, LiDAR, as a new technology, broadens the access to data and information for palaeoearthquake study.
The Yabrai range-front fault is a normal fault,which is about 120km long,trends N60°E and distributes along the southeast margin of the Alashan block. In this paper,we focus on the geomorphology and kinematics of the Yabrai range-front fault,and discuss the implications of the fault for the regional tectonics. This fault consists of three segments and the most active one is located in the southwest,which has a length of about 35km. The about 1~2m-high scarp,stretching almost the full segment,might be the result of the latest earthquake event. Fresh free surface indicates that the elapsed time of the last event should not be long. The middle segment is about 31km in length. The results suggest that just a single fault is developed along the piedmont of the Yabrai Shan,and there is no evidence of recent activity on this fault. In contrast to the simple geometric structure of the middle segment,the northeast segment consists of several faults. The scarps of the most recent earthquake event,which are clear but discontinuous,are about 0.5~1.5m high and some are up to 2m. Although the scarps along the southwest and northeast segments of the fault are similar,it is difficult to suggest they are caused by the same earthquake without precise dating. The seismic reflection profile suggests that the Yabrai range-front fault came into being as a normal fault in Cretaceous,when the Tibetan plateau did not emerge at that time. Therefore,we conclude that the Yabrai range-front fault is not the consequence of the Indo-Asian collision. But this region plays a great role in constraining the tectonic evolution of the Alashan block and therefore,the Tibetan plateau.