SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 553-569.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2023.02.015

• Research paper • Previous Articles     Next Articles

DETERMINATION OF GRAVITY VALUES FOR MULANSHAN CALIBRATION BASELINE AND ANALYSIS OF GRAVITY CHANGE

WANG Jian1,2,3)(), ZHANG Xin-lin2,3), TAN Hong-bo2,3), HU Min-zhang2,3), WU Gui-ju2,3), LI Zhong-ya2,3), ZHANG Ming-hui2,3)   

  1. 1)College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    2)Key Library of Earthquake Geodesy, Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan 430071, China
    3)Hubei Earthquake Agency, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Revised:2022-09-25 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-05-18

木兰山重力基线场的初值测定及重力变化分析

汪健1,2,3)(), 张新林2,3), 谈洪波2,3), 胡敏章2,3), 吴桂桔2,3), 李忠亚2,3), 张明辉2,3)   

  1. 1)中国科学院大学, 地球与行星科学学院, 北京 100049
    2)中国地震局地震研究所, 地震大地测量重点实验室, 武汉 430071
    3)湖北省地震局, 武汉 430071
  • 作者简介:汪健, 男, 1986年生, 2011年于中国地震局地震研究所获固体地球物理专业硕士学位, 现为中国科学院大学固体地球物理专业在读博士研究生, 副研究员, 主要从事重力场变化监测研究, E-mail: wangjian196@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(41604014);国家自然科学基金(41974021);国家自然科学基金(41774015);国家自然科学基金(42074172);中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH20039);中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH21021)

Abstract:

Using the gravity observation data of Mulanshan short gravity baseline field in 2018 and 2022, we established a high-precision short gravity baseline field of Mulanshan based on the relative gravity joint measurement method under the control of absolute gravity. We also analyzed and discussed the accurate calibration of the monomial coefficient of the relative gravimeter during the construction of the gravity short baseline field, the distribution of gravity values in the gravity baseline field of Mulanshan and the contribution of various environmental factors in the gravity variation results, these results show that:

(1)Maximum gravity segment difference of Mulanshan calibration baseline is 102.176mGal from G01 to G03 stations, and the average accuracy of gravity value of each measuring station reaches 4.8μGal. The geological structure of the Mulanshan baseline is stable, and the gravity change of measuring stations is not obvious. From 2018 to 2022, the gravity variation range of measuring stations was 5.9~12.8μGal, with an average of 9.5μGal, and the average uncertainty was ±5.7μGal. The gravity field mainly showed a positive change. The variation range of gravity in each measurement section is -4.8~6.9μGal, with an average of(1.8±8.6)μGal. The change of the surrounding environment has a certain impact on the gravity field, and the contribution of the new buildings near the G01 and G02 to the gravity change is 3.6μGal and -0.51μGal, respectively. These gravity changes of measuring stations in the IOS and Mulanshan baseline caused by vertical surface movement are(2.17±0.44)μGal and(1.67±0.45)μGal. The gravity effect caused by the change of surface water storage is(1.07±0.84)μGal, which cannot be ignored. Compared with observation results, the gravity change of each measuring station and section after correction is reduced, and the average gravity change values are reduced by 38.2% and 50.8%, respectively. The corrected gravity change results are more accurate. Due to the cumulative effect of errors in the correction process, the uncertainty of gravity change results after correction increases accordingly, and the uncertainty of gravity change results of measuring station and measuring section increases by 2.5% and 2.8%compared with observation results, respectively. Combined with the gravity change results of the measuring station and the measuring section, we can effectively extract abnormal information in gravity dynamic change results.

(2)There are differences in monomial coefficients of different gravity sections of the relative gravimeter. The results of CG-6 and CG-5 relative gravimeters are relatively consistent, and there is no systematic deviation between the two gravimeters. The difference in the monomial coefficient between the Wuhan-Yichang section(sub-section)and the Wuhan-Lücongpo section(total section)is 4.809‰, which has a great influence on the gravity observation results. The monomial coefficient needs to be accurately measured. The difference of the monomial coefficient in the sub-section is negatively correlated with the proportion of the gravity segment difference in the sub-section to the total section; the monomial coefficient of the total section is a weighted average result of each sub-section, and the proportion of gravity segment difference in sub-section to total section is the corresponding weight factor. Accurate calibration of the monomial coefficient of the relative gravimeter is a technical guarantee to obtaining high-precision gravity observation results. The gravity segment difference of sub-segments cannot cover the gravity range of the measurement area due to smaller segment difference, which will lead to the extrapolation of the monomial coefficient, so it cannot effectively calibrate the monomial coefficient of the relative gravimeter applicable to the whole measurement area. The total section can cover the gravity range of the measurement area, and the monomial coefficient is the ratio between the segment difference measured by the relative gravimeter and the known segment difference, and its calibration accuracy is inversely proportional to the gravity segment difference, so when using the total section as a reference for calibration of the monomial coefficient of the relative gravimeter, accuracy of the calibration can be guaranteed and precision of the calibration can be improved, so calibration result of the monomial coefficient using the total section is more accurate. The existing widely used relative gravimeters(such as LCR, CG-5, BURRIS, CG-6, and so on)have time-varying characteristics of the monomial coefficient, weakening the errors caused by changes of the monomial coefficient is essential to improve the accuracy of observations, and corresponding calibration is required before each period of gravity observation. The monomial coefficient of the relative gravimeters needs to be calibrated using a large segment difference, and the segment difference(or the accumulated segment difference)should be greater than 300mGal.

Key words: Mulanshan gravity baseline, gravity change, monomial coefficients, Surface gravity observation

摘要:

文中基于绝对重力控制下的木兰山基线场2018年和2022年的重力观测资料, 研究了一次项系数在不同读数段的分布规律、木兰山基线场的重力场分布和近期重力变化特征。结果表明: 相对重力仪不同读数段的一次项系数存在差异, 武汉-宜昌测段(子测段)的一次项系数与武汉-绿葱坡测段(总测段)的差异可达4.809‰, CG-6型与CG-5型重力仪的结果较为一致, 2类重力仪间无系统偏差; 总测段的一次项系数是各子测段一次项系数的加权平均结果, 其相应的权因子为子测段与总测段的重力段差比值; 木兰山基线场的最大重力段差(G01-G03)为102.176mGal, 各测点的重力值平均精度为4.8μGal; 2018-2022年木兰山基线场测点的重力变化区间为5.9~12.8μGal, 重力场整体呈正变化, 测段重力变化区间为-4.8~6.9μGal。测点周边环境变化、地表垂直运动、地表水储量变化对地表实测重力变化均产生了一定影响。综合上述各项改正后的测点和测段重力变化均值较实测值相应减小了38.2%和50.8%, 改正后的重力变化结果更为精准, 但其不确定度相应增加了2.5%和2.8%。综合分析测点和测段的重力场动态变化可有效提取异常信息, 为地震重力监测提供更精确的数据支持。

关键词: 木兰山基线场, 重力变化, 一次项系数, 地表重力观测

CLC Number: