地震地质

• •    

滇东南地区小江断裂南段历史滑坡特征及其地震地质意义

高帆,韩竹军,董绍鹏,郭鹏,袁仁茂   

  1. 中国地震局地质研究所
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-15 修回日期:2021-05-06 发布日期:2021-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 韩竹军
  • 基金资助:
    鲜水河-小江断裂系第四纪与红河断裂带交切关系研究;小江断裂带南段第四纪构造变形、起始时代与滑动速率研究;中国地震活断层探察-南北地震带中南段

Features of ancient landslides and theirs seismic-geological significance along the southern segment of Xiaojiang fault in the southeastern Yunnan, China

  • Received:2021-03-15 Revised:2021-05-06 Published:2021-09-26
  • Supported by:
    The intersection relationship between the Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault system and the Red River fault zone in the Quaternary;Structural deformation, inception time and slip rate in the southern segement of Xiaojiang fault in the Quaternary

摘要: 历史地震资料在研究地震活动性和评价地震危险性方面起着重要作用, 沿着活动断裂丛集状发育的地震滑坡可以为识别和复核历史地震提供重要的线索。通过遥感影像和野外地质调查,发现沿着小江断裂南段至少在10个地点上发育滑坡,规模大小不一,既有体积在100万m3以上的大型滑坡,也有体积<10万m3小型滑坡,但均表现为目前处于稳定状态的历史古滑坡。这些滑坡主要分布在地形坡度较缓的盆地及其边界地区,很可能为地震滑坡,而非降雨诱发。滑坡后缘陡坎角度基本上集中在29-31°之间,表明它们应该为一次地震事件的结果。基于LIDAR测量建立的滑坡发育段落数字高程模型(DEM),在生成的三维地形阴影图上清晰地揭示了滑坡体与小江断裂南段最新地表破裂带的密切关系,该断裂段最晚一次断错地表的地震事件触发了丛集状分布的滑坡。综合经验估算结果、滑坡体探槽中年代样品14C测试结果和历史文献资料,地震滑坡的发生时间可以推断为公元1606。对这些历史地震滑坡的认识一方面为把小江断裂南段确定为该地震的发震构造提供了有力的证据;另一方面也为重新评价地震震级提供了一个新的切入点。根据小江断裂南段地震地表破裂带的最新研究成果及经验关系式,同时结合不同震例的地质灾害强度以及人员伤亡数的对比分析,对1606年建水地震震级的复核结果表明:其震级很可能不小于71/2级(≥7.5级)。鲜水河-小江断裂系的强烈活动和大震发生能力至少一直延续到小江断裂南段。目前为GPS观测资料所证实的青藏高原东南缘地壳物质绕东喜马拉雅构造结(EHS)顺时针转动需要一个连续的左旋走滑断裂系统作为东部边界,本文的工作和认识可以促进对这样一个东部边界更深入的研究。

关键词: 历史古滑坡, 小江断裂南段, 1606年建水地震, 发震构造

Abstract: Historical seismic data plays an important role in the study of seismicity and the evaluation of seismic risk, while earthquake-triggered landslides distributed with clustering features along active faults can provide key clues for identifying and assessing historical earthquakes. Based on remote sensing interpretation and field investigations, landslides with different scales have developed in more than 10 locations along the southern segment of the Xiaojiang Fault (XJF), which are ancient landslides with a stable state. These landslides are mainly distributed in basins and their border areas with gentle terrain slopes. They are likely to be earthquake landslides rather than rainfall induced. The main scarp angles of these landslides are relatively concentrated, most of them are between 29-31 degrees, indicating that these landslides are caused by one geological event. Some of them are large with a volume of more than 1 million m3, and some of them are small with a volume of less than 100,000 m3. The analysis results presented in this paper suggested that there is a close relationship between these landslides and the latest surface ruptures of the southern segment of the XJF, indicating that these landslides should be triggered by the latest seismic event along the southern segment of XJF. Based on the age test results of samples from the trench on the landslide body and historical literature data, the co-seismic landslides were triggered in 1606 AD. According to the latest research results of the earthquake surface rupture zone in the southern segment of the XJF and empirical formula, combined with the comparative analyzing the intensity of geological disasters and the number of casualties of different earthquake cases, the authors rechecked the magnitude of the 1606 Jianshui earthquake, showing that the magnitude of this historical earthquake could be not less than 71/2 (≥7.5). It means that the southern segment of the XJF, as the part of Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang fault (XSH-XJF) system, have the strong activity and ability to generate large earthquakes. GPS observations have verified that the crustal material on the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau rotates clockwise around the Eastern Himalaya Tectonic Structure (EHS), which requires a continuous left-lateral strike-slip fault system as the eastern boundary. The results presented in this paper are useful for deeper study of such an eastern boundary.

Key words: Ancient landslides, Southern segment of Xiaojiang fault, 1606 Jianshui Earthquake, Seismogenic structure