地震地质

• •    

青海玛多7.4级地震GNSS同震水平位移快速获取方法

李经纬1,2,陈长云3,占伟1,武艳强4   

  1. 1. 中国地震局第一监测中心
    2. 中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院
    3. 中国地震局地震预测研究所
    4.
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-31 修回日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 陈长云
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发专项;国家自然科学基金;中国地震局震情跟踪定向工作任务

Fast methods to obtain the coseismic horizontal displacement of the MaDou M7.4 earthquake in Qinghai Province By GNSS

  • Received:2021-05-31 Revised:2021-08-11 Published:2021-09-26

摘要: 2021年5月21日青海玛多7.4级地震导致玛多县及其周边地区受灾严重,为快速获取GNSS同震位移场服务于震情快速研判,本文采用多种方法对玛多地震开展了针对性研究。采用1Hz高频动态差分、震后五小时静态解算及多天静态解算三种方法进行了同震位移获取,经对比分析结果表明GAMIT/GLOBK的动态差分Track模块在利用高频数据获取同震形变时适用于近场形变量较大的测站,对远场形变量小的测站的适用性不强;震后五小时静态解算获得的同震位移与多天静态解算结果相比时效性更强,两者数值相差约1-4mm,所反应的位移大小、方向以及影响范围都保持较强的一致性。综合GNSS资料分析表明,本次地震发震断层为昆仑山口-江错断裂,且震源机制以左旋走滑为主,距离震中区约40公里的QHMD(玛多)站西向位移约24cm,北向位移约8cm,从近场测站两种方法结果分析震后变形显著,仍需持续关注。

关键词: 青海玛多7.4级地震, GNSS, 同震位移

Abstract: On May 21,2021, the Maduo M7.4 earthquake in Qinghai Province caused serious disasters in Maduo County and its surrounding areas. In order to quickly obtain the GNSS coseismic displacement field and serve for the rapid investigation and determination of the earthquake situation, this paper used various methods to carry out targeted research. In this paper, we collected 18 GNSS stations surrounding the epicenter, including 7 stations that recorded 1Hz high-frequency observation data. We used three methods to process the data and obtain the coseismic displacement, including dynamic difference for 1Hz frequency by GAMIT/GLOBK Track module, static calculation for five hours of postseismic data and static calculation for multi-day data. The results show that the dynamic difference of GAMIT/GLOBK Track module has ability to quickly solve the data. When using the high frequency data to obtain coseismic deformation by Track module, it is suitable for the near field stations which have large value of coseismic deformation. However, in the far field, the accuracy of the solution is at cm level which is restricted by the distance of both stations. Although the results obtained by Track are not accurate, it can be used as a method to quickly determine the motion characteristics and displacement of the surface. The static calculation for five hours data is more time-sensitive than the results obtained by the multi-day static calculation. Comparing the results obtained by static calculation for five hours data and multi-day, the magnitude, direction and influence range of the displacements of the two methods have strong consistency. However, the accuracy of the results from 5 hours data is relatively low at the far away station. When the displacement value is small, it is difficult to obtain the accurate results, and the difference is 1-4mm. Taking into account the timeliness of the 5 hours postseismic data, we believe that the results are credible as a quick emergency consultation data after earthquake. Based on the analysis of various results, we preliminary judged the Maduo earthquake is a dominated by left-handed strike-slip. At present, the maximum displacement of the QHMD station, which is about 40km from the epicenter, is about 24cm in western and 8cm in northern. The earthquake affected the area around epicenter including Maduo, Xining, Dulan,Delingh areas in the north and Zebra and Ganzi areas in the south. From the comparison of the static calculation results from 5 hours and multi-day, it is believed that the postseismic deformation process in the near field is significant, and it is still requires continued attention in the later stages.

Key words: the MaDou M7.4 earthquake in Qinghai Province, GNSS, coseismic displacement