地震地质

• •    

基于“吉林一号”高精度遥感数据研究华北地区最新构造变形样式—以夏垫断裂1679年三河-平谷地震地表破裂为例

李占飞1,孟勇琦2,徐锡伟3,赵帅1,孙佳珺2,程佳3,李康1,康文君1   

  1. 1. 中国地震局地质研究所
    2. 北京市地震局
    3. 中国地震局地壳应力研究所
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-31 修回日期:2021-08-25 发布日期:2021-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 李占飞
  • 基金资助:
    典型构造带地震复发模型构建;基于高精度地形数据的夏垫断裂实验性研究

Revealed the latest deformation style along North china block using high-resolution topographic data: A case study on Xiadian fault

  • Received:2020-12-31 Revised:2021-08-25 Published:2021-12-09
  • Contact: Zhan-Fei LI

摘要: 利用高分辨率“吉林一号”卫星影像数据,获得了夏垫断裂沿线高精度DEM数据(1.0 m)。基于高精度地形数据对夏垫断裂开展了定量研究,揭示出1679年三河平谷地震地表破裂由5条大致呈左阶平行展布,长度约为3 km的分支断层组成,地表破裂总长度约为12.3 km。位错测量揭示出断裂垂直位移沿断层呈不对称三角形分布,存在2个明显波峰。断裂沿线平均位移值为1.8 m,~3.2 m的最大位移值分布在潘各庄附近。位错模拟分析表明,其可能代表了2次地震事件的累积位错。依据夏垫断裂上代表华北地区最新构造变形的地表破裂带相关定量参数估算的震级(~Mw 6.3或~Ms 6.25),与1679年三河-平谷地震的历史震级(~M 8.0或~Ms 8.0)存在较大差异。这可能与华北地区现今剪切走滑构造变形与早期分布于上地壳的断陷拉张构造在孕震层存在的解耦作用,或华北地区巨厚第四纪覆盖层对构造变形的吸收作用相关, 这种假设也被浅层地震反射剖面揭示的断层切割关系和现今走滑型的震源机制所印证。

关键词: 夏垫断裂 高精度地形数据 垂直位错 地表破裂

Abstract: Beijing located at the North plain active tectonic block of China. The NW and NE orientation active faults widely distributed along this region. For instance, the Nankou-sunhe, Shunyi-liangxiang, and Xiadian faults. Historically, large earthquakes frequently occurred along this region, especially the converging section of these two pair of faults, for instance, the 1679 Sanhe-pinggu earthquake (M~8). Thus, it is necessary to quantitively study the faults' basic parameters, including the fault trace, slip distribution, and rupture behavior, to accurately assess the seismic hazard along this region. Xiadian active fault located at the eastern boundary of Beijing, near the Beijing Municipal Administrative Center. The 1679 Sanhe-pinggu earthquake (M~8) occurred along this fault. Previously, lots of studies have performed along this area, clearly revealed the bedrock geology, fault geometry, seismicity distribution as well as co-seismic deformation of this earthquake, which highly improve the understanding of this seismically active fault. However, although previous studies have focus on the surface rupture of 1679 earthquake, the complete rupture geometry and slip distribution have not yet been constructed, due to the restriction of high-resolution topographic data. Furthermore, the triangular shaped distribution of slip has widely occurred along active faults, especially along those typical normal faults. Whether Xiadian fault's slip distribution is the case or not, is still unclear. In order to explore all those issues above, using low-costing high-resolution (0.5m) satellite images, we derived 1.0 m grid size DEM, to quantitively explore the surface rupture along the Xiadian fault. Detailed mapping and offset measurements revealed 5 left-stepping branches (~3 km), with total length of 12.3 km for the 1679 Sanhe-pinggu Earthquake. Slip distributions along the fault exhibit the arc-shaped geometry, and the maximum and average vertical separations are ~3.2 m and ~1.8 m respectively. This triangular shaped slip distribution has been also found along the other typical normal faults, for instance, the Wairarapa fault in New Zealand, the Afar fault in East Africa, and Owens Valley fault in California. Modeling of these measurements, revealed 2 earthquakes with co-seismic vertical offset of ~1.8 m and 1.7 m, respectively. Reasonably, the maximum ~3.2 m vertical offset possibly represents cumulative vertical offset of 2 earthquakes, including the 1679 Sanhe-pinggu earthquake. Based on the relationships among the surface rupture length, average displacements, as well as moment magnitudes, the calculated size is comparatively small. On account of the cutting shape of the 2 pair of faults, on the upper crust imaging by shallow seismic reflection profile, we propose that the current right-lateral shear deformation of the fault is decoupled with the existing extensional structures, and this hypothesis have been verified by the current focal mechanism solution.

Key words: Xiadian fault, high-resolution topographic data, vertical separation distribution, surface rupture