沂沭断裂带地区地下水及地面沉降对流动重力观测的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.05.008

地震地质 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1203-1224.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.05.008

沂沭断裂带地区地下水及地面沉降对流动重力观测的影响

李树鹏¹⁾(), 祝意青²⁾^,^*(), 贾媛¹⁾, 崔华伟¹⁾, 殷海涛¹⁾, 吴双¹⁾, 王锋吉¹⁾, 陆汉鹏¹⁾

1)山东省地震局, 济南 250014
2)中国地震局第二监测中心, 西安 710054

收稿日期:2021-09-24 修回日期:2021-11-03 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-11-28
通讯作者: 祝意青
作者简介:
李树鹏, 男, 1991年生, 2017年于中国地质大学(武汉)获矿产普查与勘探专业硕士学位, 工程师, 主要从事流动重力观测方面的工作, E-mail: 570349661@qq.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41974105); 中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH21018Y); 中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH21019Y); 山东省地震局一般科研项目(YB2020)

INFLUENCE OF GROUNDWATER AND LAND SUBSIDENCE ON THE MOBILE GRAVIMETRY ALONG THE YISHU FAULT ZONE

LI Shu-peng¹⁾(), ZHU Yi-qing²⁾(), JIA Yuan¹⁾, CUI Hua-wei¹⁾, YIN Hai-tao¹⁾, WU Shuang¹⁾, WANG Feng-ji¹⁾, LU Han-peng¹⁾

1) Shandong Earthquake Agency, Jinan 250014, China
2) Second Crust Monitoring and Application Center, Xi'an 710054, China

Received:2021-09-24 Revised:2021-11-03 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-11-28
Contact: ZHU Yi-qing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

2010-2020年间利用LCR-G相对重力仪及CG-5相对重力仪对沂沭断裂带地区进行了每0.5a一期的相对重力观测, 通过对重力观测数据、水文资料和形变资料的处理分析, 发现: 1)2010年8月以来沂沭断裂带北段出现的多年期重力异常与该地区地下水位下降及地面沉降有强相关性, 地下水位变化对重力的影响可达-102.21μGal, 地面沉降产生的最大影响为190.56μGal, 二者叠加影响可达195.72μGal; 2)流动重力观测在基岩出露的山地丘陵区一般不存在非构造背景场干扰, 而当第四系平原地区的重力场出现大幅变化时, 应重点明确是否为水位变化、地面沉降等因素导致; 3)深层承压水漏斗区往往伴随地面沉降及显著的重力变化, 浅层潜水下降一般不引起地面沉降, 但水体流失会引起地面一定的重力负值变化; 4)日常对流动重力测量资料进行校正时, 可根据测点近年受地下水及垂直形变干扰的量级变化规律计算其年均校正常数, 这对流动重力资料的分析、应用以及相关研究具有一定的积极意义。

关键词: 沂沭断裂带, 重力场变化, 水位变化, 地面沉降, 校正

Abstract:

Yishu fault zone is the Shandong section of the Tanlu fault zone, and it is the structural boundary between the Luxi fault block and the Ludong fault block. In history, the Tancheng M_S8¹/₂earthquake in 1668 and the Anqiu M_S7.0 earthquake in 70BC occurred with serious casualties and property losses. The Anqiu-Juxian Fault is a Holocene active fault in the Yishu fault zone. Predecessors have conducted a lot of research on the fault by means of field geological survey, magnetotelluric measurement, small earthquake activity analysis, GPS velocity field, etc. and found that the north section of the Yishu fault zone is currently in the locking stage and has the potential for strong earthquakes with M_S≥7.
The mobile gravimetry is an effective means for medium and long-term prediction of strong earthquakes. The gravimetry along the Yishu fault zone was conducted using the LCR-G and CG-5 relative gravimeters every half year from 2010 to 2020. The mobile gravimetry anomalies occurred in the north section of the Yishu fault zone in 2019, and the area was delineated as an earthquake risk area based on the mobile gravimetry anomaly. Then the anomaly was confirmed to be caused by groundwater decrement. Therefore, it is necessary to make clear whether the mobile gravimetry anomalies are caused by tectonic or non-tectonic background field variations.
In order to provide effective mobile gravimetry data for medium and long-term forecasting of earthquakes, we divide the Yishu fault zone area into plain area and mountainous hilly area according to the different geographical landforms to study the tectonic background and characteristics of stratum lithology, geomorphology and hydrogeology of the two types of areas. Based on the 22 periods of high-precision mobile gravity data from 2010 to 2020, the high temporal-spatial resolution GPS images and the distribution variation characteristics of groundwater are analyzed, the influence of groundwater and vertical crustal deformation on gravimetry is calculated quantitatively using the infinite plane layered model and the approximate proportional relationship between gravity and vertical crustal deformation, and the spatial distribution of gravity effects of groundwater and vertical deformation and the corrected gravity variation image are obtained. Then, combined with the leveling and GPS research results in recent years, the possibility of earthquake in the near future in the Yishu fault zone is judged. Finally, the time-sequence curve of gravity and gravity effects of groundwater and vertical deformation of Guangrao, Shouguang and Changyi stations are drawn to summarize the time-varying characteristics and synchronization of groundwater, vertical deformation and gravity.
Through the above correction processing, we find that:
(1)The multi-year gravity anomaly in the north section of the Yishu fault zone since August 2010 has a strong correlation with the decline of groundwater level and land subsidence in the region. The maximum impact of groundwater lowering on gravity is -102.21μGal, and the maximum impact of land subsidence is 190.56μGal. The superposition effect is 195.72μGal. The gravity field after correction is stable as a whole, and the variation in the positive and negative transition regions is not dramatic, indicating that there is no large differential movement of underground materials. Combined with the leveling and GPS research data, it is speculated that there is less possibility of strong earthquakes in the north section of the Yishu fault zone in the near future.
(2)The influence of groundwater and land subsidence on the mobile gravimetry mainly occurs in the north section of the Yishu fault zone, which is distributed in Quaternary strata, and there is little such interference in the bedrock-outcropped middle and south section of the Yishu fault zone. When gravity anomaly occurs in the plain area due to the variation of non-structural background field, it is likely to misidentify it as an earthquake precursor. Therefore, in the study of gravity anomaly, groundwater and vertical crustal deformation correction should be carried out first to eliminate the gravity anomaly caused by the variation of the non-tectonic background field.
(3)Deep confined water funnel area is often accompanied by land subsidence and obvious gravity variations. Phreatic decline generally does not cause land subsidence, but water loss will cause negative gravity change to a certain extent.
(4)In the daily correction of mobile gravimetry data, the mean annual correction constant can be calculated according to the magnitude variation law of groundwater and vertical crustal deformation in recent years, which has certain positive significance for the analysis, application and related research of mobile gravimetry data.

Key words: Yishu fault zone, gravity variations, water level variations, land subsidence, correction

李树鹏, 祝意青, 贾媛, 崔华伟, 殷海涛, 吴双, 王锋吉, 陆汉鹏. 沂沭断裂带地区地下水及地面沉降对流动重力观测的影响[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1203-1224.

LI Shu-peng, ZHU Yi-qing, JIA Yuan, CUI Hua-wei, YIN Hai-tao, WU Shuang, WANG Feng-ji, LU Han-peng. INFLUENCE OF GROUNDWATER AND LAND SUBSIDENCE ON THE MOBILE GRAVIMETRY ALONG THE YISHU FAULT ZONE[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(5): 1203-1224.

图/表 20

表1 山东省重力观测资料情况(LCR-G型及CG-5型重力仪)

Table1 Information of the gravity survey in Shandong Province(using LCR-G and CG-5 gravimeters)

使用仪器	观测年月	点值平均精度/μGal	使用仪器	观测年月	点值平均精度/μGal
G999, G1027	2010-03	13.6	G999, G1027	2015-08	8.5
G999, G1027	2010-08	12.1	G999, G1027	2016-03	9.5
G999, G1027	2011-03	11.5	G999, G1027	2016-08	8.6
G999, G1027	2011-08	10.3	C451, C452	2017-03	14.8
G999, G1027	2012-03	9.1	C451, C452	2017-10	14.3
G999, G1027	2012-08	9.4	C451, C452	2018-03	14.6
G999, G1027	2013-03	9.7	C451, C452	2018-10	13.0
G999, G1027	2013-08	7.9	C451, C452	2019-03	14.7
G999, G1027	2014-03	9.1	C451, C452	2019-10	13.6
G999, G1027	2014-08	8.3	C216, C511	2020-03	9.5
G999, G1027	2015-03	7.2	C216, C511	2020-09	8.6

图1 2010-08-2020-09原始重力变化图

Fig. 1 Spatial variation of 2020-09 original gravity variation in comparison to the 2010-08 data.

表2 重力变化与震级的定量指标

Table2 Quantitative indexes of gravity variation and seismic magnitude

震级/M_S		4	5	6	7	8
重力变化量级/μGal	胡敏章等(2019), 模型A	25	49	73	96	120
	胡敏章等(2019), 模型B	28	50	72	93	115
	祝意青等(2018)		≥50	≥80	≥100	≥120
重力变化平面范围/km	贾民育等(2000)		160	300	440	580
	祝意青等(2018)		100	200	400	600
	胡敏章等(2019)		140	220	350	660
异常时间/a	祝意青等(2018)		0.5~1	1~3	3~5	≥5

图2 沂沭断裂带及周边地区的地层分布图

Fig. 2 Strata distribution of Yishu fault zone and its surrounding areas.

图3 山东省流动重力测量路线及观测井、 CORS站分布图

Fig. 3 The repeated gravimetry network, observation wells and CORS stations in Shandong Province.

图4 观测井水位变化时序图

Fig. 4 Time sequence diagram of observed well water level variations.

图8 地下水开采及地面沉降示意图

Fig. 8 Schematic diagram of groundwater exploitation and land subsidence process.

表3 岩性分类及单一岩性的μ值(钱永, 2007)

Table3 Lithologic classification and single lithologic μ values(adapted from QIAN Yong, 2007)

岩性分类	卵砾石	粗砂	中砂	细砂	粉细砂	粉砂	粉土	粉质黏土	黏土
山前平原	0.25	0.195	0.165	0.15	0.127 5	0.11	0.08	0.054	0.035
中东部平原	0.23	0.15	0.13	0.12	0.1	0.097	0.062	0.045	0.028
古黄河冲洪积平原	0.18	0.13	0.12	0.1	0.082 5	0.067	0.053	0.038	0.035

图5 重力变化与潜水位变化的相关性拟合

Fig. 5 Correlation fitting between gravity variation and water level variation.

表4 地下水位校正结果统计表

Table4 Statistical table of groundwater level correction results

观测井	广饶	昌邑市	寿光市	寒亭区
水位变化/m	1.05	-20.80	-18.15	-3.39
重力改正/μGal	5.16	-102.21	-89.19	-16.66

图6 潜水变化对重力观测影响的分布图

Fig. 6 Distribution of influence of phreatic variation on gravimetry.

图7 广饶、寿光、寒亭、昌邑CORS站的时变数据

Fig. 7 Time-varying data of CORS stations in Guangrao, Shouguang, Hanting and Changyi.

表5 地表形变及校正结果统计表

Table5 Statistical table of surface deformation and correction results

CORS站	广饶	寿光	寒亭	昌邑
垂向年变/m	-85.2	-63.6	0.7	0.1
垂向累计变化/mm	-866.2	-646.6	7.1	1.0
重力改正量/μGal	190.56	142.25	-1.56	-0.22

图9 地表形变对重力观测影响分布图

Fig. 9 Distribution diagram of influence of surface deformation on gravimetry.

表6 地下水及地面沉降校正结果

Table6 Correction results of groundwater and land subsidence

测点	广饶	寿光	昌邑
重力实测变化/μGal	196	19	-130
地下水校正/μGal	-5.16	89.19	102.21
沉降校正/μGal	-190.56	-142.25	0.22
综合干扰/μGal	195.72	53.06	-102.43
校正后重力变化/μGal	0.28	-34.06	-27.57

图10 2010-08-2020-09校正后的重力变化图

Fig. 10 Gravity variation of 2010-08-2020-09 after correction.

图11 广饶测点的重力变化时序图

Fig. 11 Time sequence diagram of gravity variation in Guangrao.

图12 寿光测点的重力变化时序图

Fig. 12 Time sequence diagram of gravity variation in Shouguang.

图13 昌邑测点的重力变化时序图

Fig. 13 Time sequence diagram of gravity variation in Changyi.

图14 2018-03-2021-03重力变化图 a 2018-03-2021-03重力变化图(校正前); b 2018-03-2021-03重力变化图(校正后)

Fig. 14 Spatial gravity variation of 2021-03 in comparison to the 2018-03 data.

参考文献 37

[1]	曹滨. 2017. 潍坊北部地下水漏斗成因机理与演变规律研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学.
	CAO Bin. 2017. Study on the genesis and evolution of groundwater funnel in the north of Weifang[D]. Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an. (in Chinese)
[2]	晁洪太, 李家灵, 崔昭文, 等. 1995. 郯庐活断层与1668年郯城8.5级地震灾害[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 15(3): 69-80.
	CHAO Hong-tai, LI Jia-ling, CUI Zhao-wen, et al. 1995. Active fault and disaster of Tancheng M8.5 earthquake in 1668[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 15(3): 69-80. (in Chinese)
[3]	范尧, 黄旭, 陆海玉, 等. 2016. 松散介质型地下水库地下水系统特征与库容计算分析探讨[J]. 资源环境与工程, 30(3): 489-496.
	FAN Yao, HUANG Xu, LU Hai-yu, et al. 2016. Characteristics of groundwater system and capacity calculation analysis of loose medium groundwater reservoir[J]. Resources Environment and Engineering, 30(3): 489-496. (in Chinese)
[4]	胡斌, 祝意青, 徐云马, 等. 2005. 西安地区重力场时空变化特征研究[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 25(1): 86-90.
	HU Bin, ZHU Yi-qing, XU Yun-ma, et al. 2005. Spatial and temporal variation of gravity field in Xi 'an area[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 25(1): 86-90. (in Chinese)
[5]	胡敏章, 郝洪涛, 李辉, 等. 2019. 地震分析预报的重力变化异常指标分析[J]. 中国地震, 35(3): 417-430.
	HU Min-zhang, HAO Hong-tao, LI Hui, et al. 2019. Analysis of gravity anomaly index in seismic analysis and prediction[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 35(3): 417-430. (in Chinese)
[6]	华昌才, 果勇, 刘端法, 等. 1995. 首都圈地区重力场的时空变化[J]. 地震学报, 17(3): 347-352.
	HUA Chang-cai, GUO Yong, LIU Duan-fa, et al. 1995. Spatial and temporal variation of gravity field in the capital area[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 17(3): 347-352. (in Chinese)
[7]	贾金生, 田冰, 刘昌明. 2003. Visual MODFLOW在地下水模拟中的应用--以河北省栾城县为例[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 26(2): 71-78.
	JIA Jin-sheng, TIAN Bing, LIU Chang-ming. 2003. Visual MODFLOW and its application on groundwater simulation: A case on Luancheng County of Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Agriculture University of Hebei, 26(2): 71-78. (in Chinese)
[8]	贾民育, 游泽霖, 万素凡, 等. 1983. 地下水活动对精密重力测量的影响及排除方法[J]. 地壳形变与地震, 3(1): 50-67.
	JIA Min-yu, YOU Ze-lin, WAN Su-fan, et al. 1983. Effect of groundwater activity on precision gravity measurement and its elimination method[J]. Crustal Deformation and Earthquake, 3(1): 50-67. (in Chinese)
[9]	贾民育, 詹洁晖. 2000. 中国地震重力监测体系的结构与能力[J]. 地震学报, 22(4): 360-367.
	JIA Min-yu, ZHAN Jie-hui. 2000. Structure and capability of gravity monitoring system in China[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 22(4): 360-367. (in Chinese)
[10]	李杰, 于澄, 朱成林, 等. 2018. 沂沭断裂带及附近地区垂直形变特征分析[J]. 地震, 38(1): 167-177.
	LI Jie, YU Cheng, ZHU Cheng-lin, et al. 2018. Analysis of vertical deformation characteristics of Yishu fault zone and its vicinity[J]. Earthquake, 38(1): 167-177. (in Chinese)
[11]	李佩成. 1999. 黄土含水层给水度合理取值的研究[J]. 水力学报, 43(11): 38-41.
	LI Pei-cheng. 1999. Study on rational determination of specific yield in aquifer of loess area[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 43(11): 38-41. (in Chinese)
[12]	李树鹏, 张春鹏, 李国一, 等. 2020. 地下水漏斗对昌邑-新河相对重力观测的影响[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 40(11): 1129-1132.
	LI Shu-peng, ZHANG Chun-peng, LI Guo-yi, et al. 2020. Effect of groundwater funnel on the observation of relative gravity in Changyi-Xinhe area[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 40(11): 1129-1132. (in Chinese)
[13]	刘咏明, 崔圆圆, 邵震. 2015. 黄河三角洲南部冲洪积扇区浅层地下水漏斗研究[J]. 山东国土资源, 31(12): 33-36.
	LIU Yong-ming, CUI Yuan-yuan, SHAO Zhen. 2015. Shallow groundwater funnels in alluvial and diluvial fan area of the southern Yellow River Delta[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 31(12): 33-36. (in Chinese)
[14]	马海丽. 2015. 黄河三角洲典型区地下水动态及其与土壤盐渍化的关系[D]. 济南: 济南大学.
	MA Hai-li. 2015. Study on Groundwater dynamics in Yellow River Delta area and its relationship with soil salinization[D]. Jinan University, Jinan. (in Chinese)
[15]	裴源生, 李旭东, 赵勇, 等. 2020. 华北典型地下水大深埋区潜水层垂向补给特征及其给水度[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 18(1): 176-193.
	PEI Yuan-sheng, LI Xu-dong, ZHAO Yong, et al. 2020. Research on vertical recharge and specific yield of the unconfined aquifer in a typical deep groundwater areas of North China Plain[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 18(1): 176-193. (in Chinese)
[16]	钱永. 2007. 开采条件下华北平原浅层地下水系统演变研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院.
	QIAN Yong. 2007. Evolution of shallow groundwater system in North China Plain under mining conditions[D]. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[17]	任虎兴. 2017. 华北平原古河道地裂缝的成因机理探讨[D]. 西安: 长安大学.
	REN Hu-xing. 2017. Genetic mechanism of ancient channel ground fissures in North China Plain[D]. Chang'an University, Xi'an. (in Chinese)
[18]	孙景林, 刘英昊, 宋芳. 2018. 潍坊市潍北区地下水模型研究[J]. 地下水, 40(2): 35-37.
	SUN Jing-lin, LIU Ying-hao, SONG Fang. 2018. Study on groundwater model in Weibei district of Weifang City[J]. Groundwater, 40(2): 35-37. (in Chinese)
[19]	孙晓明. 2007. 环渤海地区地下水资源可持续利用研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学.
	SUN Xiao-ming. 2007. Study on sustainable utilization of groundwater resources in Bohai Rim[D]. China University of Geosciences, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[20]	孙晓明, 王卫东, 徐建国, 等. 2007. 环渤海地区地下水库开发利用前景[J]. 地质调查与研究, 30(1): 54-61.
	SUN Xiao-ming, WANG Wei-dong, XU Jian-guo, et al. 2007. Development and utilization prospect of groundwater reservoir in Circum-Bohai-Sea Region[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 30(1): 54-61. (in Chinese)
[21]	王晓兵, 张为民, 钟敏. 2009. 净月潭水库蓄水对长春基准站绝对重力变化的影响[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 29(5): 72-75.
	WANG Xiao-bing, ZHANG Wei-min, ZHONG min. 2009. Impact on absolute gravity observation at Changchun fiducial station of Jingyuetan reservoir impoundment[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 29(5): 72-75. (in Chinese)
[22]	王志才, 王冬雷, 许洪泰, 等. 2015. 安丘-莒县断裂北段几何结构与最新活动特征[J]. 地震地质, 37(1): 176-191. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2015.01.014. DOI
	WANG Zhi-cai, WANG Dong-lei, XU Hong-tai, et al. 2015. Geometric features and latest activities of the north segment of the Anqiu-Juxian Fault[J]. Seismology and Geology, 37(1): 176-191. (in Chinese)
[23]	徐锡伟, 吴熙彦, 于贵华, 等. 2017. 中国大陆高震级地震危险区判定的地震地质学标志及其应用[J]. 地震地质, 39(2): 219-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2017.02.001. DOI
	XU Xi-wei, WU Xi-yan, YU Gui-hua, et al. 2017. Seismo-geological signatures for identifying M≥7.0 earthquake risk areas and their preliminary application in mainland China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 39(2): 219-275. (in Chinese)
[24]	殷海涛, 甘卫军, 黄蓓, 等. 2013. 日本M9.0巨震对山东地区地壳活动的影响研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 56(5): 1497-1505.
	YIN Hai-tao, GAN Wei-jun, HUANG Bei, et al. 2013. Study on the effects of Japan M9.0 huge earthquake on the crustal movement of Shandong area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 56(5): 1497-1505. (in Chinese)
[25]	殷海涛, 李杰, 张玲, 等. 2008. 基于GPS观测网的山东地区地壳运动特征分析[J]. 工程地震学报, 30(3): 276-281.
	YIN Hai-tao, LI Jie, ZHANG Ling, et al. 2008. Analysis of crustal movement characteristics in Shandong based on GPS observation[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 30(3): 276-281. (in Chinese)
[26]	岳建利, 何志堂, 祝意青, 等. 2008. 利用绝对重力测量对大地原点地下水沉降的研究[J]. 测绘科学, 33(S2): 22-24, 39.
	YUE Jian-li, HE Zhi-tang, ZHU Yi-qing, et al. 2008. Study of groundwater changes by absolute gravity measurement[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 33(S2): 22-24, 39. (in Chinese)
[27]	张坤. 2017. 局部水文地质特征对地表重力观测影响研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地震局地震研究所.
	ZHANG Kun. 2017. Study on the influence of local hydrogeological characteristics on surface gravity observation[D]. Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Wuhan. (in Chinese)
[28]	张为民, 王勇. 2005. 洱海水位变化对下关基准点绝对重力观测的影响[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 25(4): 114-116.
	ZHANG Wei-min, WANG Yong. 2005. The effects of water level change of Erhai Lake on absolute gravity observation at Xiaguan station[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 25(4): 114-116. (in Chinese)
[29]	张兆吉. 2009. 华北平原地下水可持续利用图集[M]. 北京: 科学出版社:72-75.
	ZHANG Zhao-ji. 2009. Atlas of Groundwater Sustainable Utilization in North China Plain[M]. Sinomap Press, Beijing: 72-75. (in Chinese)
[30]	朱成林, 甘卫军, 李杰, 等. 2018. 日本 M_W9.0 地震后沂沭断裂带两侧块体相对运动及对地震活动的影响[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(3): 988-999.
	ZHU Cheng-lin, GAN Wei-jun, LI Jie, et al. 2018. Relative motion between the two blocks on either side of the Yishu fault zone after the 2011 Japan M_W9.0 earthquake and its effect on seismic activity[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(3): 988-999. (in Chinese)
[31]	朱光, 王道轩, 刘国生, 等. 2001. 郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景[J]. 地质科学, 36(3): 269-278.
	ZHU Guang, WANG Dao-xuan, LIU Guo-sheng, et al. 2001. Study on extensional activity and dynamic background of Tan-Lu fault zone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 36(3): 269-278. (in Chinese)
[32]	祝意青, 梁伟锋, 湛飞并, 等. 2012. 中国大陆重力场动态变化研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 55(3): 804-813.
	ZHU Yi-qing, LIANG Wei-feng, ZHAN Fei-bing, et al. 2012. Study on the dynamic variation of gravity field in the continental China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(3): 804-813. (in Chinese)
[33]	祝意青, 申重阳, 张国庆, 等. 2018. 我国流动重力监测预报发展之再思考[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 38(5): 441-446.
	ZHU Yi-qing, SHEN Chong-yang, ZHANG Guo-qing, et al. 2018. Rethinking the development of earthquake monitoring and prediction in mobile gravity[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 38(5): 441-446. (in Chinese)
[34]	Kazama T, Tamura Y, Asari K, et al. 2012. Gravity changes associated with variations in local land-water distributions: Observations and hydrological modeling at Isawa Fan, northern Japan[J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 64(4): 309-331. DOI URL
[35]	Nowell D A G. 1999. Gravity terrain corrections: An overview[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 42(2): 117-134. DOI URL
[36]	van Camp M, Vanclooster M, Crommen O, et al. 2006. Hydrogeological investigations at the Membach station, Belgium, and application to correct long periodic gravity variations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(B10): B10403. DOI URL
[37]	Williams-Jones G, Rymer H. 2002. Detecting volcanic eruption precursors: A new method using gravity and deformation measurements[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 113(3-4): 379-389.

沂沭断裂带地区地下水及地面沉降对流动重力观测的影响

INFLUENCE OF GROUNDWATER AND LAND SUBSIDENCE ON THE MOBILE GRAVIMETRY ALONG THE YISHU FAULT ZONE

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 20

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱治国, 祝意青, 王东振, 艾力夏提·玉山. 2020年伽师M_S6.4地震重力与地壳形变综合分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 269-285.
[2]	廖桂金, 叶东华, 邓志辉, 李翀, 唐国英, 胡伟明. 地震重力异常与地面沉降重力异常的特征分析[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 895-908.
[3]	王力伟, 王宝善, 叶秀薇, 张云鹏, 王小娜, 吕作勇. 基于人工地震资料的珠江口地区最小一维P波速度模型[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(1): 123-143.
[4]	王璞, 王成虎, 王洪, 陈念, 周昊, 魏学勇. 利用孔壁竖向裂缝方位数据分析沂沭断裂带的地应力场特征[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(6): 1316-1334.
[5]	刘晓东, 单新建, 张迎峰, 尹昊, 屈春燕. 基于强震记录的汶川地震同震形变场及滑动反演[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(4): 1027-1041.
[6]	陈兆辉, 孟小红, 张双喜, 刘金钊, 王同庆, 张品, 韦少港. 青藏高原东南缘多尺度重力场变化特征及孕震机理分析[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(3): 690-703.
[7]	李铁明, 徐云马, 杨永林, 冯胜涛. 鲜水河断裂带地区重力场动态变化及其与5级以上地震的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(6): 1362-1379.
[8]	陈鲲, 俞言祥, 高孟潭, 亢川川. 不同约束条件下2014年8月24日纳帕M_W6.0地震峰值加速度震动图的对比[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(2): 440-449.
[9]	朱成林, 甘卫军, 贾媛, 李杰, 殷海涛, 孔向阳. 沂沭断裂带两侧地区地震能量释放与块体相对运动的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(2): 299-309.
[10]	王庆林, 孙怀凤, 朱成林, 张继红, 唐廷梅. 基于长周期视电阻率时间序列的深部构造应力变化——以沂沭断裂带北段为例[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(1): 147-157.
[11]	王鑫, 张景发, 付萍杰, 高敏. 沂沭断裂带重力场及地壳结构特征[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3): 731-747.
[12]	陈鲲, 俞言祥, 高孟潭, 高景春. 利用强震记录校正的芦山7.0级地震峰值加速度震动图[J]. 地震地质, 2013, 35(3): 627-633.
[13]	朱桂芝, 石耀霖, 祝意青, 王庆良. 遗传有限元法反演西安地区的地层密度变化[J]. 地震地质, 2008, 30(2): 544-552.
[14]	尹金辉, 郑勇刚, 刘粤霞. 液闪法测量断裂带水中³H计数效率的标定[J]. 地震地质, 2006, 28(4): 663-667.
[15]	尹金辉, 郑勇刚, 刘粤霞. 古地震¹⁴C年龄的日历年代校正[J]. 地震地质, 2005, 27(4): 678-688.