地震地质

• •    

阿木尼克山山前地表破裂带与1962年6.8级地震关系讨论

姚生海1,盖海龙1,殷翔1,刘炜1,张加庆1,袁建新2   

  1. 1. 青海省地震局
    2. 中国建筑材料工业地质勘察中心青海总队
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-03 修回日期:2021-08-17 发布日期:2021-12-09
  • 通讯作者: 姚生海
  • 基金资助:
    青海省科技厅基础研究;中国地震局地震科技星火计划

Discussion on the relationship between the surface rupture zone in front of the Amunikeshan Mountain and the 1962 M6.8 earthquake

  • Received:2021-06-03 Revised:2021-08-17 Published:2021-12-09

摘要: 柴达木盆地北缘地区是地震频发地段,历史上曾发生多次6.0级以上地震。2003年德令哈6.6级地震以来,柴达木盆地北缘地区又在2008 、2009 年发生了6.3、6.4级两次地震,引起了广大研究者的高度关注,对于该地区的研究形成新热点。本文通过遥感解译发现在阿木尼克山山前线性特征明显,存在疑似地表破裂。断裂断错不同期的洪积扇、阶地与水系。通过实地地质考察发现沿线发育断层陡坎、断层凹槽、地震鼓梁、水系扭错等地貌,形成一条走向呈N30°-40°W、同震位移达2.3m,长约22km的地表破裂。通过探槽开挖,结合地表遗迹、地质测年,微地貌测量等,确定断裂性质以走滑为主,逆冲为辅,剖面显示断裂存在多期活动的特点,最新一次活动断错至地表,晚第四纪以来活动明显。 通过震级与地表破裂的经验统计关系、同震位移与震级经验关系,产生22km的地震地表破裂所需平均震级为6.79,形成2.3m同震位移的平均震级为7.03。结合地表破裂、探槽剖面、地质测年、地震地质灾害、经验公式计算及查阅历史地震目录、地方志等文献,认为该地表破裂极有可能是1962年5月21日6.8级地震所形成,该历史地震的发震断裂为柴达木盆地北缘断裂阿木尼克山段,与微观震中存在偏差。

关键词: 北霍布逊湖, 阿木尼克山, 发震构造, 地表破裂, 历史地震

Abstract: The investigation of the seismogenic structure of historical strong earthquakes and the research on the genetic link between earthquakes and active faults is a basic seismic geology work. In particular, the investigation of seismic surface rupture zones and the study of seismogenic structures are extremely important for understanding the characteristics of their tectonic activities, The determination of the macro epicenter provides important evidence for the site selection for post-disaster reconstruction and avoidance. Due to the diversity of the rupture process in the focal area, the macro-epicenter and the micro-epicenter may not be uniform. As the magnitude increases, the larger the focal area of an earthquake, the more significant the gap between the macro-epicenter and the micro-epicenter. The northern margin of the Qaidam Basin is an earthquake-prone area, and there have been many earthquakes above 6.0 in history. Since the Delingha Ms 6.6 earthquake in 2003, two earthquakes of M 6.3 and 6.4 occurred in the northern margin of the Qaidam Basin in 2008 and 2009, which aroused the great attention of researchers. Research has formed new hot area. Through remote sensing interpretation, this paper finds that the linear characteristics of remote sensing images in the front of the Amunikeshan Mountain are obvious, and there are suspected surface ruptures of about 30km in length, and faults faulting alluvial fans and terraces of different periods. Through field geological surveys, it was discovered that there are developed fault ridges, fault grooves, seismic drum beams, and water system twists along the line, forming a surface rupture with a strike of N30°-40°W, a coseismic displacement of 2.3m, and a length of about 22km. Through the excavation of the trench, multiple faults were exposed in the section, forming the characteristics of multi-phase activities. Combined with surface relics, geological dating, micro-topography, etc, it is determined that the fault is mainly strike-slip, supplemented by thrust, and the profile is faulty to the surface, and activity has been obvious since the Late Quaternary. Based on empirical statistical relationship between magnitude and surface rupture, and the empirical relationship between strike slip fault and rupture length, the average magnitude required to produce 22km earthquake surface rupture is 6.79, and the average magnitude to form 2.3m coseismic displacement is 7.03. Combined with surface rupture, trench profile, geological dating, seismic geological disasters, empirical formula calculation and consulting historical earthquake catalogue, local chronicles and other documents, it is considered that the fracture zone is most likely formed by the M 6.8 earthquake on May 21, 1962, and its seismogenic fault is the Amunikeshan Mountain section of the fault on the north edge of Qaidam Basin. Because the residents in this area have no buildings (structures) as the basis for inquiring and investigating the earthquake intensity, it is impossible to draw the earthquake intensity map.

Key words: North Hobson Lake, Amunikeshan Mountain, Seismogenic structure, Surface rupture, Historical earthquake