Earthquake-induced landslides, as an important secondary geological disaster, typically occurring during or shortly after an earthquake, have the characteristics of large quantity and scale, wide distribution, complex mechanism, serious casualties and economic losses, and long-duration post-earthquake effect. Rapidly and accurately obtaining the spatial distribution and potential hazard assessment of coseismic landslide following an earthquake is critical for emergency rescue and resettlement planning. Currently, the most commonly-used coseismic landslide hazard assessment methods include the data-driven machine learning methods and the Newmark method based on mechanics mechanism. The 2022 MW5.8 Lushan earthquake provides a valuable window for us to carry out rapid emergence assessment of earthquake-induced landslides with different evaluation models. In this study, a new generation of China's earthquake landslide hazard model(hereinafter referred to as Xu2019 model)and a simplified Newmark model are used to carry out the rapid landslide assessment of Lushan event. The Xu2019 model selects 9 earthquake-induced landslide inventories around China as training samples and uses a total of 13 influencing factors such as elevation, relative elevation, slope angle, and aspect, and etc. to generate a near real-time evaluation model for coseismic landslides based on the LR method. The model can rapidly assess coseismic landslides towards a single earthquake event according to the actual PGA distribution. For Newmark model, the cumulative displacement(Dn)is calculated by the critical acceleration(ac)and PGA maps. For the landslide inventory of this earthquake event, we completed the landslide inventory covering the entire affected area based on high-resolution optical satellite images(Planet)with 3m resolution acquired on 6 July 2022. Based on the coseismic landslide inventory including 2 352 landslides with an area of 5.51km2, the accuracy and applicability of the two models are estimated. The results show that the landslide area calculated based on Xu2019 model is 5.07km2, which is very close to the actual landslide area, and the predicted area calculated based on Newmark model reaches 21.3km2. From the perspective of the spatial distribution of the prediction results, the distribution of the predicted high failure probabilities of the two models is roughly same, with the high probability values mainly located on the left side of the seismogenic fault. However, the difference lies in the low probability predictions of the northwest region of Baoxing county by the Xu2019 model. A zoomed-in view of a specific area comparing the spatial distribution of predicted landslide probabilities with the landslide abundance area shows that most actual landslide are concentrated in the medium to high failure probability areas predicted by the Xu2019 model, with only a few sporadic events occurring in the low probability zone. On the other hand, the Newmark model primarily identifies high instability probability regions in steep slope areas, which correspond closely to the actual landslide and collapse occurrences. However, the predicted hazard level of the northwest region i.e. the landslide highly developed area is obviously low by Xu2019 model, while the prediction result based on Newmark model for the southwest region is obviously overestimated. In terms of the LR model, the prediction results are very close to the actual landslide distribution, and the majority of the landslides are essentially located in areas with a high failure probability, indicating that the model has a relatively high prediction accuracy. The ROC curve is used to assess the model's accuracy. The results suggest that the model based on Xu2019 outperforms the Newmark model, with a prediction accuracy of 0.77, while the prediction accuracy of the Newmark model is 0.74. Overall, both two models have good practicability in the rapid evaluation of cosesimic landslide. However, the Newmark model needs multi parameter input, and these parameters themselves and the way of human acquisition are uncertain, which results in that the model evaluation is greatly affected by subjectivity.
Geomorphic information entropy is a quantitative indicator used to determine the evolutionary stage and express the erosion degree of watershed geomorphic surface, which is a reflection of topography factors. In order to do a better job for the upcoming rainy season's debris-flow hazard zone planning and provide a reference for disaster prevention, with GIS technology as a platform and the Lushan seismic landslides' volume data as source material of debris flow, and by combining geomorphic information entropy method, the paper carries out debris-flow hazard evaluation for 55 debris flows based on landslide material sources. The results show that: The range of the value of geomorphic information entropy is between 0.003 2~0. 938 1 in debris-flow valley basin of the study area, and valley geomorphic evolution is distributed from childhood to old age; the area of debris-flow hazard zone shows a decreasing trend basically from high to low hazard zone, with 80. 77% of the study region locating in the debris flow prone area, and the presence of debris-flow valley in its juvenile to mature stage increases the risk of debris flow. The response rate of seismic slope mass movement(RRSSMM)of the debris flow basin varies from 0~133. 24mm, and the area of material source sensitive area of low and very low degree accounts for 72. 93% of the valley basin area of the study area, which indicates that nearly 3/4 of debris-flow valley basins are insensitive to landslides material source. The result of debris-flow hazard evaluation based on landslides material source indicates that more than 2/5 of the debris flow valley basin is located in moderate or above hazard zone, where debris flow activity seems more active.
On August 3, 2014, an MS6.5 earthquake happened in the Ludian County, Zhaotong City of Yunnan Province. This earthquake caused a large number of landslides. In order to study the spatial distribution of the coseismic and pre-earthquake landslides, a 44.13km2 area at the junction of Ludian County, Qiaojia County and Huize County along the Niulanjiang River is selected in this study. By visual interpretation of the Google Earth pre-earthquake high resolution images and the coseismic aerial data of 0.2m resolution of this area, the landslide databases of pre-earthquake and coseismic are established. The result shows that there are 284 pre-earthquake landslides, and 1053 earthquake-induced landslides. Then with the help of 10m×10m resolution DEM data and the GIS, the extracted factors of elevation, slope angle, slope aspect, curvature, lithology, earthquake intensity and drainages are used to analyze the spatial distribution of the coseismic and pre-earthquake landslides by adopting LAP(Landslide Areas Percentage)and LND(Landslide Number Density). The results show that areas with elevation <1 200m and 1 200~1 300m are prone to landslides whatever pre-earthquake or coseismic. With the slope gradient increasing, it is much more prone to landslide, and the area of <10°, close to the rivers, is also much susceptible. The advantage slope aspect is almost near S direction. Concave slope(when the curvature is negative)is much susceptible to landslides, and with the curvature decreasing, the landslide susceptibility gets higher. The region of limestone with dolomitic limestone is sensitive to landslide; in the areas consisting of basalt and volcanic breccia, the slope stability is greatly reduced under the effect of seismic force. The larger the intensity is, the more landslides happened. For either pre-earthquake or coseismic landslides, there is a positive correlation between landslide spatial distribution and the distance to rivers. The large pre-earthquake landslides have effective influence on LAP.
On August 3, 2014, an earthquake with MS6.5 occurred at Ludian County, Yunnan Province of China. The earthquake caused 617 deaths, 112 missing, and 3, 143 injured. Thousands of landslides were triggered by the earthquake and some of the landslides buried a few settlements, which resulted in significant casualties and property losses. In this study, we compiled an inventory of landslides triggered by the Ludian earthquake based on visual interpretation of high resolution satellite images, which are TH01-02 and SJ9A satellite images photoed post-earthquake and GF1 images shot pre-earthquake. Furthermore, some of the landslides were verified by field photos and/or very high resolution aerial photographs. The result shows the Ludian earthquake triggered at least 1024 landslides with an area equal to or larger than 100 m2. The landslides are distributed in a 250km2 area, with a total landslide area of 5.19 km2 and a total volume of 2.2×107m3. In the landslide-distributing area, the landslide number density is 4.03km-2, the landslide area density is 2.04%, and the landslide erosion thickness is about 86.7mm. The statistical result of landslide number and area in different directions of the epicenter shows that the main spread direction of the landslides is northwest-southeast and most of the landslides occurred southeast of the epicenter. This suggests that the seismogenic fault of the earthquake probably trends to northwest and the rupture direction is from northwest to southeast, which is consistent with evidences from seismic, geological, geophysical, as well as other aspects. Comparing the landslide distribution area, landslide number, landslide area, and landslide volume related to the Ludian earthquake with those of other earthquakes worldwide, the result shows that the earthquake registered a smaller landslide distribution area but a larger landslide area and a much larger landslide volume. It suggests that the hypocenter of the Ludian earthquake is shallow and seismic energy attenuation of the event is quite rapid.
The April 20,2013,MS 7.0 Lushan earthquake occurred along the southwestern part of the Longmen Shan Fault zone. Tectonics around the epicenter area is complicated and several NE-trending faults are developed. Focal mechanisms of the main shock and inversions from finite fault model suggest that the earthquake occurred on a northeast-trending,moderately dipping reverse fault,which is consistent with the strike and slip of the Longmen Shan Fault zone. NE-trending ground fissures and soil liquefaction along the fissures,heavy landslides along the Dachuan-Shuangshi and Xinkaidian Faults were observed during the field investigations. No surface ruptures were found in the field work. GPS data indicate that the fault on which this earthquake occurred is a fault east of or near the Lushan county and the earthquake also triggered slip on the fault west of the Lushan county. Field observations,GPS data,focal fault plane,focal depth,and distribution of the aftershocks suggest, that the seismogenic structure associated with the MS 7.0 Lushan earthquake is the décollement beneath the folds of the eastern Longmen Shan. Slip along this decollement generated the earthquake,and also triggered the slip along the Dachuan-Shuangshi and Xinkaidian Faults.
On April 20,2013,a strong earthquake of MS 7.0 struck the Lushan County,Sichuan Province of China. In this paper,basic information of the April 20,2013 Lushan earthquake,historical earthquakes in the Lushan earthquake struck area and associated historical earthquake-triggered landslides were introduced firstly. We delineated the probable spatial distribution boundary of landslides triggered by the Lushan earthquake based on correlations between the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslides and associated peak ground acceleration(PGA).According to earthquake-triggered landslides classification principles,landslides triggered by the earthquake are divided into three main categories: disrupted landslides,coherent landslides,and flow landslides. The first main category includes five types: rock falls,disrupted rock slides,rock avalanches,soil falls,and disrupted soil slides. The second main category includes two types of soil slumps and slow earth flows. The type of flow landslides is mainly rapid flow slides. Three disrupted landslides,including rock falls,disrupted rock slides,and soil falls are the most common types of landslides triggered by the earthquake. We preliminary mapped 3883 landslides based on available high-resolution aerial photographs taken soon after the earthquake. In addition,the effect of aftershocks on the landslides,comparisons of landslides triggered by the Lushan earthquake with landslides triggered by other earthquake events,and guidance for subsequent landslides detailed interpretation based on high-resolution remote sensing images were discussed respectively. In conclusion,based on quick field investigations to the Lushan earthquake,the classifications,morphology of source area,motion and accumulation area of many earthquake-triggered landslides were recorded before the landslide might be reconstructed by human factors,aftershocks,and rainfall etc. It has important significance to earthquake-triggered landslide hazard mitigation in earthquake struck area and the scientific research of subsequent landslides related to the Lushan earthquake.
On July 22,2013,an earthquake of MS 6.6 occurred at the boundary between Minxian County and Zhangxian County,Gansu Province of China. Many landslides were triggered by the earthquake and the landslides were of various types,mainly in falls,slides,and topples occurring on loess cliffs,and also including soil deep-seated coherent landslides,large-scale soil avalanches,and slopes with cracks. Most of the landslides were distributed in an elongated area of 250km2,parallels to the Lintan-Dangchang Fault, with about 40km in length and the largest width of 8km. Landslides occurrence shows obvious difference along the central line of the elongated area,corresponding to different characteristics of different segments of the seismogenic fault. The elongated landslides main distribution area and the location of the epicenter indicate that the direction of the fault rupture propagation is from southeast-east to northwest-west. Finally,two probable reasons causing the horizontal distance of about 10km between the central line of the elongated area and the Lintan-Dangchang Fault are presented.
On July 22,2013,the Minxian-Zhanxian MS 6.6 earthquake occurred at the central-northern part of the South-North Seismic Belt. In the area,complicated structural geometries are controlled by major strike-slip fault zones,i.e.the Eastern Kunlun Fault and the Northern Frontal Fault of West Qinling. The distribution of related seismic disasters,namely,the ellipse with its major axis trending NWW,is in good accord with the strike of the Lintan-Tanchang Fault. Severe damages in the meizoseismal area of the Minxian-Zhangxian MS 6.6 earthquake are located within the fault zone. So it is considered that the earthquake related damages are closely related to the complicated geometry of the Lintan-Tanchang Fault,and it also indicates that the earthquake is the outcome of joint action of its secondary faults. Based on field investigations,and by integrating the results of previous studies on active tectonics,structural deformation and geophysical data,it can be inferred that the southward extension of the Northern Frontal Fault of West Qinling and the northeastward extrusion of the Eastern Kunlun Fault in the process of northeastward growth of Tibetan plateau are the main source of tectonic stress. Basic tectonic model is provided for strong earthquake generation on the Lintan-Tanchang Fault.
The Longmen Shan,located at the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau,is a steep and high exhumation area. In recent years,the 2008 Wenchuan MW7.9 earthquake and the 2013 Lushan MS7.0 earthquake occurred,and researchers presented a lot of low-temperature thermochronology data of the Longmen Shan and adjacent area. In this paper,we provide 4 ZFT ages and 4 AFT ages for the southern segment of the Longmenshan Thrust Belt(LTB),where the low-temperature thermochronology data are still few. Combining with previous researches,we get the Cenozoic exhumation history of the Baoxing Massif,located at the southern segment of the LTB,and new knowledge about the Cenozoic activity of the southern segment of the LTB.The Baoxing Massif began quickly cooling in the early Cenozoic,with the cooling range exceeding 225℃,while the cooling range of the Pengguan Massif in the central segment of the Longmen Shan is between 185~225℃.The four AFT ages in the Baoxing Massif are between 2.7~5.0Ma,which are younger than that in the Pengguan Massif,and it indicates that the late-Cenozoic cooling rate of the Baoxing Massif is bigger than that of the Pengguan Massif. Under this assumption that the surface temperature is 15℃ and the paleo-geothermal gradient is 30℃/km,the average exhumation rate from 3~5Ma to present is about 0.63~1.17mm/yr. The low-temperature thermochronology data indicate that the differential exhumation is concentrated in the Beichuan-Yingxiu Fault and the Jiangyou-Guanxian Fault in the central segment of the LTB,while it is dispersed in a wider region along the two branches of the Shuangshi-Dachuan Fault and the faults and folds to the east,in the southern segment.
In this paper,a rectangle area of 20km?10km at the northeast of Taiping Town,which suffered strong shaking during the April 20,2013 MS 7.0 Lushan earthquake,was selected as the study area for spatial analyses of landslides triggered by the earthquake. Landslide distribution map of the study area was prepared based on quick field investigations and visual interpretation of high-resolutions aerial photographs. It is showed that at least 688 landslides were triggered by the Lushan earthquake and the landslide number density(LND)of the study area is 3.44 landslides/km2.Correlations of landslide number density with topographic,geologic and seismic parameters were analyzed based on the landslide inventory. The results show that the steeper the slopes,the greater the landslide number density values; the highest LND value appears at ranges from 1 600m to 1 800m in elevation. The landslides have preferred orientations,dominated by the east and SE directions. LND values of convex slopes are relatively higher. The limestone and dolomite of the Yangxin Group,Permian(Py)and granitic rocks of Proterozoic(Pt)experienced more concentrated landslides. In general,the higher the PGA value and seismic intensity zone,the greater the LND value. Correlation of landslide number density with distance from the Shuangshi-Dachuan Fault shows that there was not sudden change of LND value near the fault. The factor interaction statistics show that the slope angle and PGA affect the occurrence of earthquake-triggered landslides independently.
2036 landslides were triggered by the 2010 Yushu earthquake from aerial photographs and remote sensing images interpreting,verified by selected field checking. In this paper,twelve factors that influence landslide occurrence,including distance from main co-seismic surface ruptures,peak ground acceleration (PGA),elevation,slope angle,slope aspect,slope curvature,slope position,distance from drainages,lithology,distance from faults,distance from roads,normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI),are selected as landslide hazard evaluation factors. Two types of landslide hazard index map are derived using two "weight of evidence" methods based on Geographical Information Systems (GIS) technology.The success rate of Add-"weight of evidence" method is 80.32%,and the success rate of Subtract-"weight of evidence" method is 80.19%,both are satisfactory.The resulting hazard evaluation maps are divided into five categories, i.e.extremely high,high,moderate,low,and extremely low,respectively.The landslide hazard maps can be used to identify and delineate unstable hazard-prone areas. It can also help planners to choose favourable locations for development schemes,such as infrastructures,buildings,road construction,and environmental protection.
On April 14,2010 at 07:49 (Beijing time), a catastrophic earthquake with MS 7.1 struck Yushu County, Qinghai Province, China. About 2036 landslides, covering an area of about 1.194km2, were interpreted from aerial photographs and remote sensing imageries and verified by field check. And based on the above, the spatial distribution of the Yushu earthquake triggered landslides is presented in this paper. The distribution of the landslides was strongly dominated by main surface ruptures, and their types are varied, with the collapse-type landslide as the dominant. There are five genetic mechanisms of Yushu earthquake triggered landslides, they are: the slope-toe excavation type, the surface water infiltration induced slope slip type, the fault dislocation type, the shaking type, and post-quake snow melting and rainfall penetration type. Besides the main seismic surface ruptures, there are many slope fissures developed mainly on the SE end of the surface rupture zone on the SW wall, an area undergoing intensive compression in the earthquake.