东天山三条地震地表破裂带的展布及其与两次历史地震的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.006

地震地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 77-90.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.01.006

东天山三条地震地表破裂带的展布及其与两次历史地震的关系

吴富峣¹, 冉勇康^1,3, 陈立春¹, 李安^1,2

1. 中国地震局地质研究所, 活动构造与火山重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 中国地震局地壳应力研究所, 北京 100085;
3. 中国地震局地质研究所, 地震动力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2015-12-02 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-05-17
通讯作者: 冉勇康,研究员,E-mail:ykran@263.net
作者简介:吴富峣,男,1985年生,在读博士研究生,研究方向为活动构造和工程地震,电话:010-92009140,E-mail:woaiac1899@163.com。
基金资助:
财政部重点项目"全国地震重点监视防御区活动断层地震危险性评价"(1521044025)资助

DISTRIBUTION OF 3 EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE ZONES IN ESATERN TIENSHAN AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH 2 HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES

WU Fu-yao¹, RAN Yong-kang^1,3, CHEN Li-chun¹, LI An^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Volcano, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Institute of Crust Dynamics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100085, China;
3. State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2015-12-02 Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-05-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

查明地表破裂带的展布对确定历史地震震中位置和震级大小有着十分重要的意义。东天山地区历史记载有1842年巴里坤附近的7级地震和1914年巴里坤附近的7 1/2级地震,发震构造存在争议。通过野外地质调查,确认东天山存在3条与这2次历史地震相关的地表破裂带,即碱泉子-洛包泉断裂上的鄯善北塔孜布拉克地表破裂带,巴里坤盆地南缘断裂上的雄库尔地表破裂带以及伊吾盆地南缘断裂上的盐池破裂带。综合该地区历史地震文字记录和目前的研究程度分析,认为雄库尔地表破裂带可能与1842年地震相关,而盐池破裂带则与1914年地震相关,塔孜布拉克破裂带可能代表了1次漏记的历史强震。在雄库尔破裂带以东约100km的巴里坤县城南发现巴里坤盆地南缘断裂干扰的堆积地层年龄为(3110±30)a,据此我们不能排除雄库尔地表破裂带延伸至巴里坤县城南一带的可能性。该区域位于文字记载的极震区之内,加之文字记载的1842年地震的影响范围不小于1914年地震,认为1842年地震震级不应小于1914年地震。

关键词: 东天山, 巴里坤, 历史地震, 地震震中, 地表破裂带, 震级

Abstract:

The distribution of earthquake rupture zone plays a very important role in determining location of epicenter and magnitude of historical earthquake. There is still argument about the seismogenic structure of the 1842 M7 Balikun earthquake and the 1914 M7 1/2 Balikun earthquake in the historical records in eastern Tienshan. Through field geological survey, we confirm that there exist 3 rupture zones in Eastern Tienshan. These rupture zones, Tazibulake rupture zone on the Jian Quanzi-Luo Baoquan Fault, north of Shanshan, Xiong Kuer rupture zone on the south Balikun Basin Fault and Yanchi rupture zone on the south Yiwu Basin Fault, are closely related to 2 historical earthquakes. Based on historical literature and current geological evidence analysis, we infer that Xiong Kuer rupture zone was produced by 1842 M7 earthquake and Yanchi rupture zone by 1914 M7 1/2 earthquake, while Tazibukale rupture zone may represent another unrecorded historical event. South Balikun Basin Fault disturbs Quaternary stratigraphy which has a ¹⁴C age of 3110±30 B.P in the south of Balikun County, ~100km to the east of Xiong Kuer rupture zone, therefore we can't preclude the possibility that Xiong Kuer rupture zone extends to the south of Balikun County. This region overlaps with the meizoseismal area based on the literature document, together with the fact that the impact of 1842 earthquake is no less than 1914 earthquake, we believe that the magnitude of 1842 earthquake is no less than that of the 1914 earthquake.

Key words: Eastern Tienshan, Balikun, historical earthquake, epicenter, rupture zone, magnitude

中图分类号:

P315.2

吴富峣, 冉勇康, 陈立春, 李安. 东天山三条地震地表破裂带的展布及其与两次历史地震的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(1): 77-90.

WU Fu-yao, RAN Yong-kang, CHEN Li-chun, LI An. DISTRIBUTION OF 3 EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE ZONES IN ESATERN TIENSHAN AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH 2 HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(1): 77-90.

参考文献

柏美祥, 罗福忠, 李军, 等. 1999. 哈密盆地北缘活动断裂带微地貌［J］. 内陆地震, 13(2):162-168.
BO Mei-xiang, LUO Fu-zhong, LI Jun, et al. 1999. Micro-geomorphology on the active northern margin fault zone of Hami Basin［J］. Inland Earthquake, 13(2):162-168(in Chinese).
邓起东, 冯先岳, 张培震, 等. 2000. 天山活动构造[M]. 北京:地震出版社.
DENG Qi-dong, FENG Xian-yue, ZHANG Pei-zhen, et al. 2000. Active Tectonics in Tien Shan[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
邓起东, 于贵华, 叶文华. 1992. 地震地表破裂参数与震级关系的研究[M]. 见:活动断裂研究(2). 北京:地震出版社:247-264.
DENG Qi-dong, YU Gui-hua, YE Wen-hua. 1992. Research on the relationship between earthquake rupture parameter and magnitude[M]. In:The Research of Active Fault (2). Seismological Press, Beijing. 247-264(in Chinese).
邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 2003. 中国活动构造与地震活动［J］. 地学前缘, 10(增刊):66-73.
DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Pei-zhen, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2003. Active tectonic and earthquake activities in China［J］. Earth Science Frontiers, 10(suppl):66-73(in Chinese).
冯希杰, 董星宏, 刘春, 等. 2005. 范家坝-临江断裂活动与1879年甘肃武都南8级地震的讨论［J］. 地震地质, 27(1):155-163.
FENG Xi-jie, DONG Xing-hong, LIU Chun, et al. 2005. Discussion on the activity of the Fanjiaba-Linjiang Fault and the south Wudou, Gansu Province M8 earthquake of 1879［J］. Seismology and Geology, 27(1):155-163(in Chinese).
冯先岳. 1997. 新疆古地震[M]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社.
FENG Xian-yue. 1997. Paleoseismology in Xinjiang[M]. Xinjiang Science and Health Press, Urumqi(in Chinese).
顾功叙, 林庭煌, 时振梁, 等. 1983. 中国地震目录(公元前1831年-公元1969年)[M]. 北京:科学出版社.266.
GU Gong-xu, LIN Ting-huang, SHI Zhen-liang, et al. 1983. China Earthquake Catalogue(1831BC-1969 AD)[M]. Science Press, Beijing. 266(in Chinese).
江娃利. 1993. 航片判读新疆东天山巴里坤活动断裂带展布及变位地形特征［J］. 内陆地震, 7(4):350-355.
JIANG Wa-li. 1993. The distribution and active characteristics of the Balikun active fault zone in the East Tien Shan of Xinjiang from aerophoto interpretation［J］. Inland Earthquake, 7(4):350-355(in Chinese).
荆凤, 申旭辉, 冯春, 等. 2009. 中巴地球资源卫星数据在地震活断层研究中的应用:以巴里坤断裂带为例［J］. 地震, 29(2):48-56.
JING Feng, SHEN Xu-hui, FENG Chun, et al. 2009. Application of CBERS-002 CCD data in earthquake active fault research:A case study of Balikun fault zone in Xinjiang［J］. Earthquake, 29(2):48-56(in Chinese).
李莹甄, 沈军. 2001. 新疆哈密地区地震地质及地震活动性［J］. 内陆地震, 15(2):141-147.
LI Yin-zhen, SHEN Jun. 2001. Seismological tectonics and seismicity in Hami, Xinjiang［J］. Inland Earthquake, 15(2):141-147(in Chinese).
新疆维吾尔自治区地震局. 1985. 新疆维吾尔自治区地震资料汇编[M]. 北京:地震出版社.
Seismological Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. 1985. Compilation of Earthquake Materials of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
杨章, 丁德轩. 1987. 1842年6月11日新疆巴里坤7.5级地震［J］. 西北地震学报, 9(2):71-74.
YANG Zhang, DING De-xuan. 1987. The Balikun earthquake(M=7.5)on June 11, 1842 in Xinjiang［J］. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 9(2):71-74(in Chinese).
Abdrakhmatov K Y, Aldazhanov S A, Hager B H, et al. 1996. Relatively recent construction of the Tien Shan inferred from GPS measurements of present-day crustal deformation rates［J］. Nature, 384:450-453.
Cunningham D, Owen L, Snee L, et al. 2003. Structural framework of a major intracontinental orogenic termination zone:The easternmost Tien Shan, China［J］. Journal of the Geological Society, 160(4):575-590.
Cunningham W D, Windley B F, Dorjnamjaa D, et al. 1996. Late Cenozoic transpression in southwestern Mongolia and the Gobi Altai-Tien Shan connection［J］. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 140(1):67-81.
Liu M, Yang Y, Shen Z, et al. 2007. Active tectonics and intracontinental earthquakes in China:The kinematics and geodynamics［J］. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 425:299-318.
Molnar P, Deng Q. 1984. Faulting associated with large earthquakes and the average rate of deformation in central and eastern Asia［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(B7):6203-6227.
Molnar P, Tapponnier P. 1975. Cenozoic tectonics of Asia:Effects of a continental collision［J］. Science, 189:419-426.
Sobel E R, Dumitru T A. 1997. Thrusting and exhumation around the margins of the western Tarim Basin during the India-Asia collision［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(B3):5043-5063.
Tapponnier P, Molnar P. 1979. Active faulting and Cenozoic tectonics of the Tien Shan, Mongolia, and Baykal regions［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84(B7):3425-3459.

[1]	姚生海, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 刘炜, 张加庆, 袁建新. 阿木尼克山山前地表破裂带与1962年6.8级地震关系的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 976-991.
[2]	姚文倩, 王子君, 刘静, 刘小利, 韩龙飞, 邵延秀, 王文鑫, 徐晶, 秦可心, 高云鹏, 王焱, 李金阳, 曾宪阳. 2021年青海玛多M_W7.4地震同震地表破裂长度的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(2): 541-559.
[3]	梁宽, 何仲太, 姜文亮, 李永生, 刘泽民. 2022年1月8日青海门源M_S6.9地震的同震地表破裂特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 256-278.
[4]	梁子晗, 魏占玉, 庄其天, 孙稳, 何宏林. 基于高分辨率地形数据的富蕴M8.0地震地表破裂带精细特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1507-1523.
[5]	祁玉萍, 龙锋, 林圣杰, 肖本夫, 赵小艳, 王培玲, 冯建刚. 南北地震带中段及周边中强地震序列类型的特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(1): 177-196.
[6]	谢卓娟, 李山有, 吕悦军, 徐伟进, 张愉玲, 刘雯歆. 中国海域及邻区统一地震目录及其完整性分析[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(4): 993-1019.
[7]	邵延秀, 袁道阳, 刘静, Jerome Van der Woerd, 李志刚, 吴磊, 刘方斌. 阿尔金断裂中段南月牙山古地震地表破裂带及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(2): 435-454.
[8]	徐良鑫, 冉勇康, 梁明剑, 吴富峣, 高帅坡, 王虎. 新疆巴里坤1842年和1914年2次M71/2历史地震地表破裂的几何展布及特征[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(1): 1-17.
[9]	吴果, 周庆, 冉洪流. 震级-频度关系中b值的极大似然法估计及其影响因素分析[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(1): 21-43.
[10]	马冀, 冯希杰, 李高阳, 李晓妮, 师亚芹. 1568年陕西高陵地震考证与发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(1): 178-188.
[11]	闫小兵, 周永胜, 李自红, 郭瑾. 1695年临汾7(3/4)级地震发震构造研究[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(4): 883-902.
[12]	吴熙彦, 徐锡伟, 于贵华, 程佳, 陈桂华, 安艳芬, 王启欣. 国家川滇实验场地震地表破裂带分布图编制[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 27-41.
[13]	姚琪, 邢会林, 徐锡伟, 张微, 刘杰. 利用非线性摩擦有限元方法计算大凉山次级块体及其周边地区地震危险性[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 171-185.
[14]	韩竹军, Nicola Litchfield, 冉洪流, 袁仁茂, 郭鹏, Robert M Langridge, Russ J Van Dissen. 新西兰2016年凯库拉M_W7.8地震地表破裂带特征初析[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 675-688.
[15]	高帅坡, 冉勇康, 吴富峣, 徐良鑫, 王虎, 梁明剑. 利用无人机摄影测量技术提取复杂冲积扇面构造活动信息——以新疆巴里坤盆地南缘冲积扇面为例[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 793-804.

东天山三条地震地表破裂带的展布及其与两次历史地震的关系

DISTRIBUTION OF 3 EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE ZONES IN ESATERN TIENSHAN AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH 2 HISTORICAL EARTHQUAKES

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价