琼北峨蔓地区火山地质与喷发历史

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.04.003

地震地质 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 859-875.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2022.04.003

琼北峨蔓地区火山地质与喷发历史

杨文健¹^,²⁾(), 赵波¹^,²⁾^,^*(), 于红梅¹^,²⁾, 许建东¹^,²⁾, 潘波¹^,²⁾, 王锡娇³⁾

1)吉林长白山火山国家野外科学观测研究站, 中国地震局地质研究所, 北京 100029
2)中国地震局地震与火山灾害重点实验室, 北京 100029
3)海南省地震局, 海口 570203

收稿日期:2021-05-08 修回日期:2021-06-16 出版日期:2022-08-20 发布日期:2022-09-23
通讯作者: 赵波
作者简介:杨文健, 男, 1994年生, 2020年于中国地震局地质研究所获矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业硕士学位, 现为中国地震局地质研究所矿物学、岩石学、矿床学专业在读博士研究生, 研究方向为岩石地球化学, E-mail: yangwenjian@ies.ac.cn。
基金资助:
中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA1712);中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA1603)

STUDY ON VOLCANIC GEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF ERUPTION IN EMAN AREA, NORTHERN HAINAN ISLAND

YANG Wen-jian¹^,²⁾(), ZHAO Bo¹^,²⁾^,^*(), YU Hong-mei¹^,²⁾, XU Jian-dong¹^,²⁾, PAN Bo¹^,²⁾, WANG Xi-jiao³⁾

1) Jilin Changbaishan Volcano National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
2) Key Laboratory of Seismic and Volcanic Hazards, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
3) Hainan Earthquake Agency, Haikou 570203, China

Received:2021-05-08 Revised:2021-06-16 Online:2022-08-20 Published:2022-09-23
Contact: ZHAO Bo

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

琼北作为中国最大的第四纪火山区之一, 其火山活动表现出多期、多旋回的特征, 但位于其西北角的峨蔓火山岩的喷发时代依然存在争议。文中对峨蔓火山区展开了详细的火山地质及地貌调查, 并结合全岩主量元素分析及火山岩K-Ar年代学和贝壳¹⁴C年代学研究, 揭示了其火山活动时代和喷发特征等。峨蔓火山区包括笔架岭、春历岭、兵马角、龙门激浪、龙门灯塔及张屋等火山, 其火山喷发方式主要为溢流式喷发、射汽-岩浆爆破式喷发和弱岩浆爆破式喷发。熔岩流几乎遍及整个火山区, 分布面积约为26.3km²; 基浪堆积物、溅落堆积物以及火山渣分布范围较小, 仅限于龙门激浪-五彩湾和张屋村附近。峨蔓火山岩成分变化较大, 整体偏中性, 主要由玄武安山岩、玄武粗安岩和粗安岩组成, 岩浆演化过程经历了橄榄石和单斜辉石的结晶分异。综合火山岩风化程度(球形风化、红土层)、火山地质与地貌特征(锥体形貌、坡度)、岩石学和地球化学特征(橄榄石斑晶蚀变、全岩成分差异)以及K-Ar年龄(0.12~0.44Ma)和贝壳¹⁴C年代学结果((43.27±0.67)ka BP), 分析认为峨蔓火山区的火山活动时代应属于中、晚更新世。

关键词: 第四纪火山, 喷发方式, 喷发时代, 琼北火山群, 峨蔓

Abstract:

As one of the largest Quaternary volcanic clusters in China, the volcanic activities of Qiongbei are characterized by multi-stage and multi-cycle. However, the eruption era of Eman volcanic rocks located in the northwest of Qiongbei volcanic cluster is still controversial. In this paper, we present a comprehensive study of volcanic geology and geomorphology, whole-rock major elements, K-Ar geochronology of volcanic rocks and ¹⁴C geochronology of conch, in order to reveal the epoch of volcanic activity and eruption characteristics of Eman volcanic field. According to the field geological survey, it is found that Eman volcanic field has many craters, such as Bijialing, Chunliling, Bingmajiao, Longmenjilang, Longmen Pharos, and Zhangwu. The main types of eruptions are effusive eruption, phreatomagmatic explosive eruption and weakly magmatic explosive eruption. Lava flows almost cover the entire volcanic field, with an area of about 26.3km², which are mainly formed by the eruptions of Bijialing and Chunliling volcanoes in the central-south of the volcanic field. Among them, Bijialing volcano consists of five volcanoes, with steep-slope cones and grayish-black block lavas. Chunliling volcano is located in the east of Bijialing, with gentle slope cone, few lava outcrops and spherical weathering. However, the distribution of base-surge deposits, spattering deposits and scoria is relatively small, and limited to the vicinity of Longmenjilang to Wucaiwan and Zhangwu Village. They were formed by phreatomagmatic explosive eruptions of Bingmajiao and Zhangwu volcano, as well as weakly magmatic explosive eruptions of Longmenjilang and Longmen Pharos volcanoes. Moreover, compared with the Holocene Shishan and Late Pleistocene Daotang basalts in Haikou, Eman volcanic rocks have a wider range of silicon(SiO₂=51.39%~55.00%)and alkali(K₂O+Na₂O=3.51%~8.48%)content. Nevertheless, they are general intermediates, mainly composed of basaltic andesite, basaltic trachyandesite and trachyandesite, and experienced fractional crystallization of olivine and clinopyroxene in the process of magmatic evolution. Combining the weathering degree of volcanic rocks(spherical weathering, red clay layer), volcanic geology and geomorphology(cone morphology, slope), petrology and petrogeochemistry(difference of major elements, olivine phenocryst alteration), K-Ar age of volcanic rocks(0.12~0.44Ma)and ¹⁴C age of conch((43.27±0.67)kaBP), we conclude that the eruption era in Eman volcanic field belongs to the Middle and Late Pleistocene.

Key words: Quaternary volcano, eruption type, eruption era, Qiongbei volcanic clusters, Eman

中图分类号:

P317

杨文健, 赵波, 于红梅, 许建东, 潘波, 王锡娇. 琼北峨蔓地区火山地质与喷发历史[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 859-875.

YANG Wen-jian, ZHAO Bo, YU Hong-mei, XU Jian-dong, PAN Bo, WANG Xi-jiao. STUDY ON VOLCANIC GEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF ERUPTION IN EMAN AREA, NORTHERN HAINAN ISLAND[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2022, 44(4): 859-875.

图/表 11

图1 a 琼北晚新生代火山岩分布图(据刘建强等, 2013修改); b 峨蔓火山区火山地质简图年龄数据来自文献(葛同明等, 1989; 张仲英等, 1989; 朱炳泉等, 1989; 樊祺诚等, 2004)

Fig. 1 The distribution map of the Late Cenozoic volcanic rocks in Qiongbei (modified after LIU Jian-qiang et al., 2013)(a) and the brief geological map of Eman volcanic field(b).

图2 峨蔓地区的野外地质照片 a 笔架岭5号火山, 块状熔岩较裸露, 且发育3级熔岩流阶梯; b 5号火山下部的露头剖面, 为致密的灰黑色块状熔岩, 其顶部被厚层红土所覆盖; c 春历岭火山, 坡度较缓, 森林和植被覆盖程度高; d、 e 分别为张屋村火山基浪堆积物中发育的平行层理和增生火山砾构造; f 峨蔓火山区外围和盛中更新世火山岩, 发育球形风化; g 海口石山镇全新世马鞍岭火山岩剖面照片, 该剖面节理和裂隙发育, 基本无风化

Fig. 2 Field geological photo in Eman region.

图3 兵马角南部的基浪堆积物剖面图

Fig. 3 The section of surge base in south Binmajiao.

图4 龙门灯塔溅落堆积物剖面图

Fig. 4 The section of spattering deposits in Longmen-Dengta.

图5 峨蔓及外围的火山岩与海口地区(马鞍岭、昌道岭)的火山岩显微照片 a、 b 峨蔓笔架岭玄武粗安岩, 辉石斑晶具有砂钟、熔蚀结构, 基质为间隐结构, 可见斜长石微晶; c、 d 峨蔓春历岭粗安岩, 橄榄石斑晶伊丁石化现象明显, 辉石斑晶见内部溶蚀, 基质为间隐-玻璃结构, 含有斜长石和磁铁矿微晶; e、 f 峨蔓外围中更新世和盛粗面玄武岩, 橄榄石斑晶伊丁石化现象明显, 基质为间隐-玻璃结构, 含有斜长石和磁铁矿微晶; g、 h 马鞍岭北钻孔揭露的晚更新世玄武岩, 玻基斑状结构, 橄榄石斑晶发育伊丁石化现象; i、 j 马鞍岭全新世玄武岩, 基质为间隐结构, 含有大量斜长石和辉石微晶; k、 l 昌道岭全新世玄武岩, 基质为间隐结构, 含有大量斜长石微晶。Ol 橄榄石; Cpx 单斜辉石; Pl 斜长石。“-”和“+”分别表示单偏光和正交偏光照片

Fig. 5 Microphotographs of volcanic rocks in Eman, its periphery and Haikou area(Maanling and Changdaoling).

表1 峨蔓及外围火山岩主量元素的分析结果(wt%)

Table 1 Major element(wt%)analyses of volcanic rocks in Eman and its periphery

样品编号	SiO₂	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	Fe₂ $O 3 T$	FeO	CaO	MgO	K₂O	Na₂O	MnO	P₂O₅	H₂O⁺	H₂O^-	LOI	总和	Mg^#
HN8-12-2	54.05	1.59	14.35	11.50	7.99	8.09	6.11	0.70	3.07	0.15	0.20	0.73	0.25	0.06	99.87	51.3
HN8-12-3	55.00	1.55	15.64	9.01	2.28	4.80	3.94	3.50	4.98	0.10	0.52	0.65	0.44	0.67	99.71	46.4
HN8-12-5	51.54	2.02	14.48	10.82	7.79	6.99	6.79	2.59	4.36	0.13	0.51	0.26	0.42	-0.47	99.76	55.4
HN8-12-8	53.36	1.64	14.45	11.78	8.54	8.26	6.17	0.62	3.42	0.15	0.21	0.65	0.44	-0.18	99.87	50.9
HN8-12-11	53.42	1.62	14.60	11.58	1.23	8.02	6.25	0.70	3.05	0.15	0.21	0.19	0.13	0.26	99.86	51.7
HN8-13-3	53.90	1.60	14.16	11.67	8.66	8.20	6.31	0.73	2.95	0.18	0.20	0.54	0.35	-0.1	99.81	51.7
HN8-13-6	54.99	1.59	15.23	9.12	5.95	5.09	5.10	3.42	4.75	0.10	0.52	0.43	0.36	-0.19	99.72	52.6
HN8-13-7	51.78	2.01	14.41	10.78	7.36	6.99	6.75	2.56	4.13	0.13	0.51	0.36	0.18	-0.3	99.76	55.4
HN8-14-2	52.79	1.68	14.89	12.08	8.90	8.39	6.41	0.49	3.02	0.15	0.19	0.58	0.33	-0.23	99.87	51.2
HN8-15-2	54.13	1.76	16.22	10.06	4.39	4.91	4.09	2.97	4.49	0.12	0.51	0.67	0.53	0.44	99.71	44.6
HN8-15-4	54.28	1.67	15.04	9.45	5.47	6.18	5.47	2.60	4.52	0.10	0.46	0.35	0.32	-0.03	99.74	53.4
HN8-15-6	51.49	2.06	14.88	11.20	7.00	6.92	6.12	2.52	3.87	0.12	0.51	0.54	0.40	0.03	99.73	52.0
HN8-16-1	51.39	2.10	14.96	11.23	4.75	6.84	5.80	2.52	3.83	0.13	0.52	0.63	0.47	0.41	99.73	50.6
HN8-16-6	51.55	2.05	14.55	11.11	7.14	6.94	6.83	2.43	3.71	0.14	0.49	0.61	0.34	-0.08	99.72	54.9
HN8-16-3	52.32	1.97	14.66	10.24	6.24	6.84	6.42	2.57	4.10	0.12	0.51	0.35	0.36	-0.02	99.73	55.4
HN8-17-1	51.70	1.90	14.26	11.42	7.70	7.87	7.13	1.66	3.86	0.14	0.41	0.12	0.11	-0.57	99.79	55.3
HN8-17-4	51.39	1.83	14.32	11.45	6.08	8.05	7.10	1.58	3.78	0.14	0.39	0.23	0.17	-0.24	99.77	55.1
HN8-17-5	52.39	1.66	14.83	12.07	8.20	8.37	6.61	0.38	2.97	0.15	0.19	0.62	0.48	0.24	99.86	52.1

表1 峨蔓及外围火山岩主量元素的分析结果(wt%)

Table 1 Major element(wt%)analyses of volcanic rocks in Eman and its periphery

样品编号	SiO₂	TiO₂	Al₂O₃	Fe₂ $O 3 T$	FeO	CaO	MgO	K₂O	Na₂O	MnO	P₂O₅	H₂O⁺	H₂O^-	LOI	总和	Mg^#
HN8-12-2	54.05	1.59	14.35	11.50	7.99	8.09	6.11	0.70	3.07	0.15	0.20	0.73	0.25	0.06	99.87	51.3
HN8-12-3	55.00	1.55	15.64	9.01	2.28	4.80	3.94	3.50	4.98	0.10	0.52	0.65	0.44	0.67	99.71	46.4
HN8-12-5	51.54	2.02	14.48	10.82	7.79	6.99	6.79	2.59	4.36	0.13	0.51	0.26	0.42	-0.47	99.76	55.4
HN8-12-8	53.36	1.64	14.45	11.78	8.54	8.26	6.17	0.62	3.42	0.15	0.21	0.65	0.44	-0.18	99.87	50.9
HN8-12-11	53.42	1.62	14.60	11.58	1.23	8.02	6.25	0.70	3.05	0.15	0.21	0.19	0.13	0.26	99.86	51.7
HN8-13-3	53.90	1.60	14.16	11.67	8.66	8.20	6.31	0.73	2.95	0.18	0.20	0.54	0.35	-0.1	99.81	51.7
HN8-13-6	54.99	1.59	15.23	9.12	5.95	5.09	5.10	3.42	4.75	0.10	0.52	0.43	0.36	-0.19	99.72	52.6
HN8-13-7	51.78	2.01	14.41	10.78	7.36	6.99	6.75	2.56	4.13	0.13	0.51	0.36	0.18	-0.3	99.76	55.4
HN8-14-2	52.79	1.68	14.89	12.08	8.90	8.39	6.41	0.49	3.02	0.15	0.19	0.58	0.33	-0.23	99.87	51.2
HN8-15-2	54.13	1.76	16.22	10.06	4.39	4.91	4.09	2.97	4.49	0.12	0.51	0.67	0.53	0.44	99.71	44.6
HN8-15-4	54.28	1.67	15.04	9.45	5.47	6.18	5.47	2.60	4.52	0.10	0.46	0.35	0.32	-0.03	99.74	53.4
HN8-15-6	51.49	2.06	14.88	11.20	7.00	6.92	6.12	2.52	3.87	0.12	0.51	0.54	0.40	0.03	99.73	52.0
HN8-16-1	51.39	2.10	14.96	11.23	4.75	6.84	5.80	2.52	3.83	0.13	0.52	0.63	0.47	0.41	99.73	50.6
HN8-16-6	51.55	2.05	14.55	11.11	7.14	6.94	6.83	2.43	3.71	0.14	0.49	0.61	0.34	-0.08	99.72	54.9
HN8-16-3	52.32	1.97	14.66	10.24	6.24	6.84	6.42	2.57	4.10	0.12	0.51	0.35	0.36	-0.02	99.73	55.4
HN8-17-1	51.70	1.90	14.26	11.42	7.70	7.87	7.13	1.66	3.86	0.14	0.41	0.12	0.11	-0.57	99.79	55.3
HN8-17-4	51.39	1.83	14.32	11.45	6.08	8.05	7.10	1.58	3.78	0.14	0.39	0.23	0.17	-0.24	99.77	55.1
HN8-17-5	52.39	1.66	14.83	12.07	8.20	8.37	6.61	0.38	2.97	0.15	0.19	0.62	0.48	0.24	99.86	52.1

图6 峨蔓以及外围地区火山岩的TAS分类图解(底图据Le Bas et al., 1986) 海口全新世石山期(马鞍岭火山、昌道岭火山)火山岩和晚更新世道堂期(马鞍岭北)火山岩的数据来自于红梅未发表的成果; 阴影区域代表琼北火山岩的成分变化范围, 数据来自文献(韩江伟等, 2009; Ho et al., 2000; Zou et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2015; 丁望, 2017)

Fig. 6 TAS diagram of volcanic rocks in Eman and its periphery(after Le Bas et al., 1986).

图7 峨蔓以及外围地区火山岩的哈克图解

Fig. 7 Harker diagrams for volcanic rocks in Eman and its periphery.

表2 笔架岭、春历岭和马鞍岭火山的主要参数

Table 2 Major parameters of Bijialing, Chunliling and Maanling volcanoes

位置	锥底直径¹/m	锥底直径²/m	高度/m	平均坡度/(°)	最大坡度/(°)
笔架岭1号火山	355	338	40	11.79	23.12
笔架岭5号火山	301	420	60	12.39	28.74
春历岭火山西南侧	300	198	35	18.65	21.31
春历岭火山北侧	561	563	30	5.01	11.83
马鞍岭火山	500	408	40	15.64	30.50

表3 峨蔓火山岩的K-Ar年龄结果

Table 3 The K-Ar chronology of volcanic rocks in Eman

样品编号	采样点	岩性	K/%	$40 A r r a d$ /mol·g^-1	$40 A r r a d$ /%	表面年龄±1σ/Ma	资料来源
81-K-15	笔架山	火山岩	1.52	2.402×10^-12	4.95	1.05±0.30	朱炳泉等, 1989
K-3	峨蔓	火山岩	2.24	7.86×10^-13	16.58	0.20±0.01	葛同明等, 1989
EMB-6	峨蔓岭西	火山岩	1.03	1.196×10^-12	7.517	0.67±0.07	樊祺诚等, 2004
HN8-16-3	三都村东	火山岩	1.73	2.96×10^-13	7.23	0.12±0.01	本工作
HN8-16-6	鱼骨村南	火山岩	2.24	6.98×10^-13	25.06	0.23±0.01	本工作
HN8-17-4	和盛北	火山岩	2.55	1.54×10^-12	5.16	0.44±0.06	本工作

表3 峨蔓火山岩的K-Ar年龄结果

Table 3 The K-Ar chronology of volcanic rocks in Eman

样品编号	采样点	岩性	K/%	$40 A r r a d$ /mol·g^-1	$40 A r r a d$ /%	表面年龄±1σ/Ma	资料来源
81-K-15	笔架山	火山岩	1.52	2.402×10^-12	4.95	1.05±0.30	朱炳泉等, 1989
K-3	峨蔓	火山岩	2.24	7.86×10^-13	16.58	0.20±0.01	葛同明等, 1989
EMB-6	峨蔓岭西	火山岩	1.03	1.196×10^-12	7.517	0.67±0.07	樊祺诚等, 2004
HN8-16-3	三都村东	火山岩	1.73	2.96×10^-13	7.23	0.12±0.01	本工作
HN8-16-6	鱼骨村南	火山岩	2.24	6.98×10^-13	25.06	0.23±0.01	本工作
HN8-17-4	和盛北	火山岩	2.55	1.54×10^-12	5.16	0.44±0.06	本工作

表4 峨蔓浪堆积层中贝壳14C年龄和火山岩热释光(TL)年龄结果

样品编号	采样点	岩性	测年方法	距今年龄/ka	资料来源
15	峨蔓南部	凝灰岩烘烤层	TL	276±13.8	张仲英等, 1989
HN8-12-8	兵马角	贝壳	¹⁴C	43.27±0.67	本工作

参考文献 48

[1]	白志达, 谭庆伟, 许桂玲, 等. 2012. 内蒙东部晚第四纪火山活动与新构造[J]. 岩石学报, 28(4): 1099-1107.
	BAI Zhi-da, TAN Qing-wei, XU Gui-ling, et al. 2012. Late Quaternary volcanic activity and neotectonics in the eastern Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(4): 1099-1107. (in Chinese)
[2]	白志达, 徐德斌, 魏海泉, 等. 2003. 琼北马鞍岭地区第四纪火山活动期次划分[J]. 地震地质, 25(S1): 12-20.
	BAI Zhi-da, XU De-bin, WEI Hai-quan, et al. 2003. Division of the active period of Quaternary volcanism in Maanling, northern Hainan Province[J]. Seismology and Geology, 25(S1): 12-20. (in Chinese)
[3]	白志达, 徐德斌, 张秉良, 等. 2006. 龙岗火山群第四纪爆破式火山作用类型与期次研究[J]. 岩石学报, 22(6): 1473-1480.
	BAI Zhi-da, XU De-bin, ZHANG Bing-liang, et al. 2006. Study on type and phase of Quaternary explosive volcanism in Longgang volcanic cluster[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(6): 1473-1480. (in Chinese)
[4]	白志达, 张进奎, 史志伟, 等. 2020. 内蒙中部辉腾锡勒第四纪火山群初步研究[J]. 岩石学报, 36(11): 3257-3264.
	BAI Zhi-da, ZHANG Jin-kui, SHI Zhi-wei, et al. 2020. Preliminary study on Quaternary volcanic cluster in Huitengxile, central Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 36(11): 3257-3264. (in Chinese) DOI URL
[5]	边兆祥. 1958. 海南岛第四纪火山[J]. 第四纪研究, 1(1): 250-251.
	BIAN Zhao-xiang. 1958. Quaternary volcano of Hainan Island[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 1(1): 250-251. (in Chinese)
[6]	丁望. 2017. 南海扩张期后西北缘岩浆-构造活动解析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学:22-23.
	DING Wang. 2017. Approach to magmatic and tectonic activities in post-spreading stage of the South China Sea by analyzing relics from its northern and western margin[D]. China University of Geosciences, Beijing: 22-23. (in Chinese)
[7]	樊祺诚, 孙建中. 1987. 琼北第四纪玄武岩的岩石学和地球化学[J]. 科学通报, 32(4): 287-291.
	FAN Qi-cheng, SUN Jian-zhong. 1987. Petrology and geochemistry of Quaternary basalt in north Hainan Island[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 32(4): 287-291. (in Chinese)
[8]	樊祺诚, 孙谦, 李霓, 等. 2004. 琼北火山活动分期与全新世岩浆演化[J]. 岩石学报, 20(3): 533-544.
	FAN Qi-cheng, SUN Qian, LI Ni, et al. 2004. Periods of volcanic activity and magma evolution of Holocene in north Hainan Island[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 20(3): 533-544. (in Chinese)
[9]	樊祺诚, 孙谦, 龙安明, 等. 2006. 北部湾涠洲岛及斜阳岛火山地质与喷发历史研究[J]. 岩石学报, 22(6): 1529-1537.
	FAN Qi-cheng, SUN Qian, LONG An-ming, et al. 2006. Geology and eruption history of volcanoes in Weizhou Island and Xieyang Island, Northern Bay[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(6): 1529-1537. (in Chinese)
[10]	付建明. 1997. 琼北新生代火山作用与构造环境[J]. 桂林工学院学报, 17(1): 26-33.
	FU Jian-ming. 1997. Cenozoic volcanism and tectonic settings in north Hainan Island[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 17(1): 26-33. (in Chinese)
[11]	符启基, 沈金羽, 林才. 2012. 海南省笔架岭火山口及峨蔓湾地质遗迹景观开发初探[J]. 资源环境与工程, 26(6): 641-644.
	FU Qi-ji, SHEN Jin-yu, LIN Cai. 2012. Discussion on development of geological relic landscape of Bijialing crater and Mindanao Man Bay in Hainan Province[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering, 26(6): 641-644. (in Chinese)
[12]	葛同明, 陈文寄, 徐行, 等. 1989. 雷琼地区第四纪地磁极性年表: 火山岩钾-氩年龄及古地磁学证据[J]. 地球物理学报, 32(5): 550-558.
	GE Tong-ming, CHEN Wen-ji, XU Xing, et al. 1989. The geomagnetic polarity timescale of Quaternary for Leiqiong region: The K-Ar dating and palaeomagnetic evidences from igneous rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 32(5): 550-558. (in Chinese)
[13]	海南省地质调查院. 2007. 东方县幅E49C001001 1︰25万区域地质调查报告[R]. 海口: 海南省地质调查院.
	Hainan Institute of Geological Survey. 2007. Regional geological survey report of Dongfang County map(E49C001001)[R]. Hainan Institute of Geological Survey, Haikou. (in Chinese)
[14]	韩江伟, 熊小林, 朱照宇. 2009. 雷琼地区晚新生代玄武岩地球化学: EM2成分来源及大陆岩石圈地幔的贡献[J]. 岩石学报, 25(12): 3208-3220.
	HAN Jiang-wei, XIONG Xiao-lin, ZHU Zhao-yu. 2009. Geochemistry of Late-Cenozoic basalts from Leiqiong area: The origin of EM2 and the contribution from sub-continental lithosphere mantle[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 25(12): 3208-3220. (in Chinese)
[15]	黄镇国, 蔡福祥. 1994. 雷琼第四纪火山活动的新认识[J]. 热带地理, (1): 1-10.
	HUANG Zhen-guo, CAI Fu-xiang. 1994. A new approach to the Quaternary volcanicity in the Leiqiong area[J]. Tropical Geography, (1): 1-10. (in Chinese)
[16]	黄镇国, 蔡福祥, 韩中元, 等. 1993. 雷琼第四纪火山[M]. 北京: 科学出版社:1-220.
	HUANG Zhen-guo, CAI Fu-xiang, HAN Zhong-yuan, et al. 1993. Quaternary Volcanoes of Leiqiong Area[M]. Science Press, Beijing: 1-220. (in Chinese)
[17]	梁光河. 2018. 海南岛的成因机制研究[J]. 中国地质, 45(4): 693-705.
	LIANG Guang-he. 2018. A study of the genesis of Hainan Island[J]. Geology in China, 45(4): 693-705. (in Chinese)
[18]	刘建强, 任钟元. 2013. 玄武岩源区母岩的多样性和识别特征: 以海南岛玄武岩为例[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 37(3): 471-488.
	LIU Jian-qiang, REN Zhong-yuan. 2013. Diversity of source lithology and its identification for basalts: A case study of the Hainan basalts[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 37(3): 471-488.
[19]	刘祥. 1996. 当代火山喷发碎屑堆积物的研究进展及其主要类型[J]. 世界地质, 15(1): 1-6.
	LIU Xiang. 1996. Advances in pyroclastic deposits at present and the main types of the pyroclastic deposits[J]. Global Geology, 15(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[20]	孙谦. 2003. 琼北第四纪火山活动与岩浆演化[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所:1-35.
	SUN Qian. 2003. Quaternary volcanic activity and magma evolution in north Hainan Island [D]. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing: 1-35. (in Chinese)
[21]	王薇华. 2007. 海口火山旅游资源开发研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学:18-20.
	WANG Wei-hua. 2007. Research on the development of volcanic traveling resources in Haikou City[D]. China University of Geosciences, Beijing: 18-20. (in Chinese)
[22]	汪啸风, 马大铨, 蒋大海. 1992. 海南岛地质(二): 岩浆岩[M]. 北京: 地质出版社:167-169.
	WANG Xiao-feng, MA Da-quan, JIANG Da-hai. 1992. Geology of Hainan Province(Volume Two): Magmatic Rocks[M]. Geological Publishing House, Beijing: 167-169. (in Chinese)
[23]	魏海泉, 白志达, 胡久常, 等. 2003. 琼北全新世火山区火山系统的划分与锥体结构参数研究[J]. 地震地质, 25(S1): 21-32.
	WEI Hai-quan, BAI Zhi-da, HU Jiu-chang, et al. 2003. Nomenclature of the Holocene volcanic systems and research on the textural parameters of the scoria cones in northern Hainan Island[J]. Seismology and Geology, 25(S1): 21-32. (in Chinese)
[24]	许建东, 于红梅, 周本刚, 等. 2019. 核电厂选址的火山安全评价与灾害评估[J]. 地震地质, 41(5): 1289-1301.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2019.05.015. DOI
	XU Jian-dong, YU Hong-mei, ZHOU Ben-gang, et al. 2019. Site evaluation and volcanic hazard assessment for the nuclear power plants of China[J]. Seismology and Geology, 41(5): 1289-1301. (in Chinese)
[25]	杨文健, 于红梅, 赵波, 等. 2020. 广西涠洲岛晚新生代玄武岩地幔源区及岩浆成因[J]. 岩石学报, 36(7): 2092-2110.
	YANG Wen-jian, YU Hong-mei, ZHAO Bo, et al. 2020. Mantle sources and magma genesis of late Cenozoic basalts from Weizhou Island, Guangxi, China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 36(7): 2092-2110. (in Chinese) DOI URL
[26]	于红梅. 2011. 火山喷发物的显微构造研究及其地质意义[D]. 北京: 中国地震局地质研究所:1-40.
	YU Hong-mei. 2011. Microstructural study on volcanic products and its geological implications[D]. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing: 1-40. (in Chinese)
[27]	曾广策. 1984. 海南岛北部第四纪玄武岩岩石学[J]. 地球科学, (1): 63-72.
	ZENG Guang-ce. 1984. Petrology of Quaternary basalt in the north of Hainan Island[J]. Earth Science, (1): 63-72. (in Chinese)
[28]	张仲英, 刘瑞华. 1989. 海南岛第四系火山岩的分期[J]. 地质科学, (1): 67-76.
	ZHANG Zhong-ying, LIU Rui-hua. 1989. The stage-division of Quaternary volcanic rocks in Hainan Island[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, (1): 67-76. (in Chinese)
[29]	赵波, 许建东, 潘波, 等. 2008. 吉林龙岗龙泉龙湾火山火口基浪堆积物粒度特征及搬运机制分析[J]. 岩石学报, 24(11): 2631-2637.
	ZHAO Bo, XU Jian-dong, PAN Bo, et al. 2008. Preliminary study on grain size distribution and transportation characteristics of the base-surge deposits near Longquanlongwan volcano crater, Jilin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24(11): 2631-2637. (in Chinese)
[30]	赵波, 许建东, 于红梅. 2010. 长白山地区火山碎屑粒度特征研究[J]. 地震地质, 32(2): 233-243.. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2010.02.006. DOI
	ZHAO Bo,XU Jian-dong,YU Hong-mei. 2010. Grain size characteristics of pyroclasts in Changbaishan Mountain area[J]. Seismology and Geology, 32(2): 233-243. (in Chinese)
[31]	赵勇伟, 樊祺诚, 白志达, 等. 2008. 大兴安岭哈拉哈河-淖尔河地区第四纪火山活动初步研究[J]. 岩石学报, 24(11): 2569-2575.
	ZHAO Yong-wei, FAN Qi-cheng, BAI Zhi-da, et al. 2008. Preliminary study on Quaternary volcanoes in the Halaha River and Chaoer River area in Daxing’an Mountain range[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24(11): 2569-2575. (in Chinese)
[32]	赵勇伟, 樊祺诚, 白志达, 等. 2013. 大兴安岭诺敏河-奎勒河地区第四纪火山活动研究[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 43(9): 1464-1473.
	ZHAO Yong-wei, FAN Qi-cheng, BAI Zhi-da, et al. 2013. Quaternary volcanism in the Nuomin River and Kuile River area of the Greater Hinggan Mountains[J]. Science in China(Ser D), 43(9): 1464-1473. (in Chinese)
[33]	朱炳泉, 王慧芬. 1989. 雷琼地区MORB-OIB过渡型地幔源火山作用的Nd-Sr-Pb同位素证据[J]. 地球化学, (3): 193-201.
	ZHU Bing-quan, WANG Hui-fen. 1989. Nd-Sr-Pb isotopic and chemical evidence for the volcanism with MORB-OIB source characteristics in the Leiqiong area, China[J]. Geochimica, (3): 193-201. (in Chinese)
[34]	Briais A, Patriat P, Tapponnier P. 1993. Updated interpretation of magnetic anomalies and seafloor spreading stages in the South China Sea: Implications for the Tertiary tectonics of Southeast Asia[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 98(B4): 6299-6328.
[35]	Gu X Y, Wang P Y, Kuritani T, et al. 2019. Low water content in the mantle source of the Hainan plume as a factor inhibiting the formation of a large igneous province[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 515: 221-230. DOI URL
[36]	Ho K S, Chen J C, Juang W S. 2000. Geochronology and geochemistry of late Cenozoic basalts from the Leiqiong area, southern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 18(3): 307-324. DOI URL
[37]	Le Bas M J, Le Maitre R W, Streckeisen A, et al. 1986. A chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali-silica diagram[J]. Journal of Petrology, 27(3): 745-750. DOI URL
[38]	Lebedev S, Nolet G. 2003. Upper mantle beneath Southeast Asia from S velocity tomography[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(B1): ESE21-1-ESE21-26.
[39]	Lei J S, Zhao D P, Steinberger B, et al. 2009. New seismic constraints on the upper mantle structure of the Hainan plume[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 173(1-2): 33-50.
[40]	Liu J Q, Ren Z Y, Nichols A R L, et al. 2015. Petrogenesis of Late Cenozoic basalts from North Hainan Island: Constraints from melt inclusions and their host olivines[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 152: 89-121. DOI URL
[41]	Sigurdsson H. 2015. The History of Volcanology [M]∥ Sigurdsson H, Houghton B, McNutt S R, et al (eds). The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes(Second Edition). Academic Press, London: 13-32.
[42]	Wang X C, Li Z X, Li X H, et al. 2012. Temperature, pressure, and composition of the mantle source region of late Cenozoic basalts in Hainan Island, SE Asia: A consequence of a young thermal mantle plume close to subduction zones?[J]. Journal of Petrology, 53(1): 177-233. DOI URL
[43]	Wang X C, Li Z X, Li X H, et al. 2013. Identification of an ancient mantle reservoir and young recycled materials in the source region of a young mantle plume: Implications for potential linkages between plume and plate tectonics[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 377-378: 248-259.
[44]	Wei W, Xu J D, Zhao D P, et al. 2012. East Asia mantle tomography: New insight into plate subduction and intraplate volcanism[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 60: 88-103. DOI URL
[45]	Wei W, Zhao D P. 2020. Intraplate volcanism and mantle dynamics of Mainland China: New constraints from shear-wave tomography[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 188: 104103.
[46]	Xia S H, Zhao D P, Sun J L, et al. 2016. Teleseismic imaging of the mantle beneath southernmost China: New insights into the Hainan plume[J]. Gondwana Research, 36: 46-56. DOI URL
[47]	Zhao B, Xu D B, Bai Z D, et al. 2021. Volcanism in the Longgang volcanic field of NE China: Insights from eruption history, volcano types and geochemical characteristics[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 510(1): 27-39. DOI URL
[48]	Zou H B, Fan Q C. 2010. U-Th isotopes in Hainan basalts: Implications for sub-asthenospheric origin of EM2 mantle endmember and the dynamics of melting beneath Hainan Island[J]. Lithos, 116(1-2): 145-152. DOI URL

琼北峨蔓地区火山地质与喷发历史

STUDY ON VOLCANIC GEOLOGY AND HISTORY OF ERUPTION IN EMAN AREA, NORTHERN HAINAN ISLAND

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 48

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨列坤, 王非, 贺怀宇, 桑海清, 王英兰. 年轻火山岩氩同位素体系定年技术最新进展及问题[J]. 地震地质, 2009, 31(1): 174-185.
[2]	孙谦, 樊祺诚. 琼北射气岩浆喷发力学机制探讨[J]. 地震地质, 2005, 27(1): 63-72.
[3]	白志达, 徐德斌, 魏海泉, 胡久常. 琼北马鞍岭地区第四纪火山活动期次划分[J]. 地震地质, 2003, 25(s1): 12-20.
[4]	陈孝德, 史兰斌, 林传勇. 华北第四纪火山作用研究[J]. 地震地质, 2001, 23(4): 564-573.