地震地质 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 811-832.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2023.04.001

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于扩散方程的陡坎形貌测年方法进展

许建红1,2)(), 陈杰1), 魏占玉1), 李涛1)   

  1. 1) 中国地震局地质研究所, 地震动力学国家重点实验室, 新疆帕米尔陆内俯冲国家野外科学观测研究站, 北京 100029
    2) 中国地震局第二监测中心, 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-10 修回日期:2022-11-22 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-09-20
  • 作者简介:

    许建红, 男, 1983年生, 2022年于中国地震局地质研究所获构造地质学专业博士学位, 高级工程师, 主要从事活动构造研究、 地震安全性评价等工作, E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(SQ2022YFC3000066); 国家自然科学基金(41802229); 国家自然科学基金(41772221); 第2次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0901)

MORPHOLOGIC DATING OF SCARP MORPHOLOGY BASED ON DIFFUSION EQUATION: A REVIEW

XU Jian-hong1,2)(), CHEN Jie1), WEI Zhan-yu1), LI Tao1)   

  1. 1) Xinjiang Pamir Intracontinental Subduction National Observation and Research Station, State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
    2) The Second Monitoring and Application Center, China Earthquake Administration, Xi'an 710054, China
  • Received:2022-08-10 Revised:2022-11-22 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-09-20

摘要:

陡坎是一种自然界常见的台阶状地貌, 但其形成年龄通常很难直接测定。发育在松散堆积物中的陡坎经过初期短暂的重力垮塌之后, 将经历漫长的低能退化过程。如果陡坎剖面形态的演化可基于扩散方程来模拟, 且扩散系数可独立标定, 即可利用陡坎地形剖面估算其年龄, 这种方法被称为形貌测年。文中简要回顾了陡坎形貌测年的研究历史, 介绍并讨论了陡坎退化的概念模型与扩散模型, 特别是非线性扩散模型的建立及求解、 参数在扩散模型中所起的作用、 最佳陡坎形貌年龄的确定流程等, 分析了陡坎上、 下地貌面坡度对陡坎退化的影响, 编制了非线性扩散模型的年龄图版, 给出了图版的应用实例, 验证了形貌测年方法的有效性。线性扩散模型和非线性扩散模型均可用于单次事件陡坎的退化分析, 但对于年轻的单次事件陡坎推荐使用非线性扩散模型。断层重复活动形成的陡坎的退化分析则需要谨慎对待, 恒定滑动速率陡坎的非线性扩散模型适用于模拟年龄<10ka、 活动速率高的断层陡坎的演化; 多次事件陡坎模型(包括线性扩散和非线性扩散)需要仔细评估每次事件在陡坎剖面上的断错位置及其位移量。尽管陡坎形貌测年方法存在很多假设条件, 但目前快速获取一定范围内的高分辨率地形数据已成为现实, 从这些数据中可以沿着同一陡坎提取大量剖面进行分析, 继而得到具有统计意义的结果, 这为陡坎退化分析和形貌测年方法提供了广阔的应用前景。

关键词: 陡坎, 陡坎退化, 扩散模型, 形貌测年, 断层陡坎

Abstract:

A scarp is a common step-like landform in nature, which consists of a gently sloping plane connected to the upper and lower geomorphic surfaces of differing elevations. Common scarps include fault scarps, terrace scarps, lake shoreline scarps, shoreline scarps, volcanic ash cinder cones, etc. Scarps are often used as strain markers because of their linear characteristics and are favored in the study of active tectonics. However, it is difficult to directly constrain their ages. Instead, they are usually constrained by the ages of the upper and lower geomorphic surfaces. The scarp developed in loose deposits is controlled by a long process of low-energy degradation after a short collapse. This process can be modeled by the diffusion equation because the process can be considered as a slope process under the transport-limited condition. Under this condition, the slope can provide enough loose material for transport, that is, the material transport capacity is less than the material supply capacity. If process assumptions are sufficiently valid and rate constraints can be calibrated independently, the true age of scarps can be obtained. This method is called morphologic dating. This method has been included in many textbooks published overseas, but there have very little research on this method in China. Both linear and nonlinear models have been developed to describe scarp degradation. Linear diffusion models assume that the diffusion coefficient is a constant, whereas nonlinear transport models generally define the diffusion coefficient as a nonlinear function related to the topographic gradient. Compared to the linear transport models, nonlinear transport models can better explain the phenomenon of rapidly increasing deposition flux as the gradient approaches a critical value. In this paper, we review the study history of scarp degradation analysis and the concept model of scarp degradation. We focus on the establishment of the nonlinear model, the role of the different parameters in profile evolution, determining the best-fit age using a full-scarp nonlinear modeling procedure, and so on. Furthermore, we introduce the model of the nonlinear age chart, including the effect of far-field slope on morphologic dating of scarp-like landforms and two examples of the application of the chart, which shows that this method can correctly evaluate the ages of single-event scarps. Finally, we discuss the extension of the concept and method of the scarp degradation model, the applicability of the model, and repeated fault scarp morphological analysis. For nonlinear diffusion models, in addition to n equal to 2, two parameters (critical gradient (Sc) and diffusion constant (k)) need to be constrained. The critical gradient can be obtained from the young scarps in the study area, which roughly represents the initial state of scarp evolution, typically 0.6 to 0.7(30° to 35°). The diffusion constant needs to be characterized by a known age scarp. The slopes of the upper and lower geomorphic surfaces have an obvious influence on the morphology of a degraded scarp. These discussions indicate that both linear and nonlinear models can be used for the degradation analysis of single-event scarps, but a nonlinear diffusion model is recommended for young single-event scarps. The constant slip rate nonlinear model can be used to simulate the evolution history of<10ka high-slip rate active fault scarp. The multiple-event scarp model requires careful evaluation of the fault location and the amount of displacement per event. There are several assumptions in the scarp topography diffusion modeling, which require practice to verify its reliability. With advances in surveying technology, it is now possible to rapidly obtain high-resolution terrain data over broad areas from which numerous topographic profiles can be efficiently extracted. This provides a broad application prospect for scarp degradation analysis and morphologic dating.

Key words: scarp, scarp degradation, diffusion model, morphologic dating, fault scarp