地震地质 ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1244-1261.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2025.04.20240007

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

2023年甘肃积石山MS6.2地震前地电阻率异常特征分析

张丽琼(), 李娜, 高曙德, 姜佳佳   

  1. 甘肃省地震局, 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-16 修回日期:2024-05-29 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-10-09
  • 作者简介:

    张丽琼, 女, 1989年生, 高级工程师, 2015年于西北师范大学获人文地理学专业理学硕士学位, 目前主要从事地震预报及地震电磁学研究, E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH24047YA); 中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH23039YA); 地震科学联合基金(U2039206); 中国地震局震情跟踪任务(CEA-ZQGZ-202501049)

APPARENT RESITIVITY VARIATION OBSERVED FROM EARTH RESITIVITY STATIONS BEFORE THE JISHISHAN MS6.2 EARTHQUAKE IN 2023

ZHANG Li-qiong(), LI Na, GAO Shu-de, JIANG Jia-jia   

  1. Gansu Earthquake Agency, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2024-01-16 Revised:2024-05-29 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-10-09

摘要:

地电阻率观测和研究是地震预测与震情跟踪中的重要技术之一。文中利用原始曲线方法和自适应相关幅度方法, 对积石山 MS6.2 地震震中附近地电阻率观测数据进行分析, 结合地震前的现场异常核实工作和以往震例回溯, 对此次地震前地电阻率异常特征进行研究。结果显示: 震中300km范围内4个台站出现异常, 台站位于震中近N、 NE和SE向。通过原始曲线方法分析得到, 通渭台地电阻率在震前2个月出现快速下降, 为短期异常; 武胜驿和定西台出现破年变高值变化, 武威台的年变幅减小, 3个台站均出现中期时间尺度异常, 呈现异常起始时间准同步的特点。利用自适应变化幅度法进行定量分析发现, 通渭台 N20°W和EW' 2个测道的异常起始时间为2023年9月, 提取的异常变幅分别为0.09Ω·m和0.12Ω·m, 超过异常阈值线的指标分别为0.07%、 0.2%; EW测道的异常起始时间为2023年10月, 提取的异常变幅为0.12Ω·m, 超过异常阈值线的指标为0.4%; 武威台NS测道的异常起始时间为2023年5月, 提取的异常变幅为0.2Ω·m, 超过异常阈值线的指标为0.15%; 定西台 EW测道的异常起始时间为2023年4月, 提取的异常变幅为0.04Ω·m, 超过异常阈值线的指标为0.2%。文中研究结果可为异常核实工作中地电阻率异常提取、 异常性质判定, 以及为依据地电阻率异常开展地震预测提供一定的借鉴和参考。

关键词: 积石山MS6.2地震, 地电阻率, 异常特征, 自适应变化幅度

Abstract:

The 2023 MS6.2 Jishishan earthquake was the largest seismic event in Gansu Province since the 2013 MS6.6 Minxian-Zhangxian earthquake. Due to its high intensity and significant casualties, it drew widespread public attention and reignited discussions regarding the predictability of earthquakes. Earthquake prediction remains a challenging scientific endeavor critical to public safety. Among the various geophysical techniques employed for short-to medium-term earthquake monitoring, apparent resistivity observation has shown considerable potential. Anomalous variations in apparent resistivity relative to background values, particularly their spatiotemporal evolution prior to seismic events, have become a focal point in earthquake research.

This study investigates apparent resistivity anomalies preceding the 2023 Jishishan earthquake using data from stations located within a 300km radius of the epicenter. Two analytical methods were applied: the original curve method and the adaptive change magnitude method. These analyses were supplemented by pre-earthquake anomaly verification and retrospective evaluation of historical seismic cases to explore the characteristics of apparent resistivity anomalies associated with the event.

The key findings are as follows: 1)Apparent resistivity anomalies were detected at four stations within 300km of the epicenter, with the earliest anomaly recorded at Wuwei Station, located north of the epicenter. Between 2 and 7 months before the earthquake, anomalies emerged sequentially at stations to the northeast and southeast of the epicenter, with no anomalies observed in the southwest direction. The spatial distribution of anomalies suggests that the observed signals were not generated directly at the seismic source but were instead induced by regional stress redistribution linked to tectonic activity. The anomalous stations are interpreted as stress-sensitive sites. Under the influence of NNW-directed compressive stress from the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, these sites—particularly Wuwei, Wushengyi, Dingxi, and Tongwei—experienced heightened compressive deformation, thereby enhancing the likelihood of resistivity anomalies. 2)Analysis using the original curve method revealed a sharp decline at Tongwei Station during the two months preceding the earthquake, indicating a short-term anomaly. Wushengyi and Dingxi stations exhibited year-scale variations in high/low values, while Wuwei Station showed a reduction in annual variation amplitude. These three stations thus demonstrated medium-term anomalies, with nearly synchronous onset times. Using the adaptive change magnitude method, the anomaly at Tongwei Station began in September 2023 on the N20°W and EW' profiles, with magnitudes of 0.09 Ω·m and 0.12 Ω·m, respectively. These anomalies coincided with threshold exceedances of 0.07% and 0.2%. For the EW' profile, an additional anomaly began in October 2023(0.12 Ω·m, 0.4%threshold exceedance). At Wuwei Station, the NS profile anomaly began in May 2023 with a magnitude of 0.2 Ω·m and a 0.15%threshold exceedance. At Dingxi Station, the EW profile anomaly began in April 2023(0.04 Ω·m, 0.2%threshold exceedance).

In conclusion, the deviations in apparent resistivity prior to the Jishishan MS6.2 earthquake, together with timely anomaly verification, hold scientific value for advancing earthquake prediction capabilities. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the role of apparent resistivity anomalies as reliable seismic precursors and provides methodological guidance for anomaly extraction, characterization, and practical application in earthquake forecasting.

Key words: Jishishan MS6.2 earthquake, apparent resistivity, anomaly characteristics, adaptivity variation amplitude