二维分形参数与构造活动关系研究——以滇西南块体为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.005

地震地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 862-873.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2016.04.005

二维分形参数与构造活动关系研究——以滇西南块体为例

石峰¹, 何宏林¹, Alexander L Densmore², 毕丽思³, 魏占玉¹

1. 中国地震局地质研究所, 活动构造与火山重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK;
3. 广东省地震局, 广州 510070

收稿日期:2015-10-28 修回日期:2016-04-03 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2017-01-20
作者简介:石峰,男,1984年生,2014年毕业于中国地震局地质研究所构造地质专业,获博士学位,助理研究员,主要从事活动构造与构造地貌研究,电话:010-62009127;E-mail:Shifeng@ies.ac.cn。
基金资助:
中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项（IGCEA1416，IGECEA1419）与中国活断层探察：南北地震带中南段项目（201108001）共同资助

RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FRACTAL FACTORS AND TECTONIC ACTIVITY——A CASE STUDY OF SOUTHWESTERN YUNNAN BLOCK

SHI Feng¹, HE Hong-lin¹, Alexander L Densmore², BI Li-si³, WEI Zhan-yu¹

1. Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Volcano, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK;
3. Earthquake Administration of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510070, China

Received:2015-10-28 Revised:2016-04-03 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2017-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

构造地貌能够记录构造运动的长期积累，并能通过相关参数定量表达。但是，由于地貌还受到气候和岩性等因素的影响，所以如何利用相关参数来表达地貌与构造之间的关系是一个研究热点。文中利用水平分辨率为90m的SRTM数据，采用元分维模型，通过变差函数法计算了滇西南地区的二维分形参数。并对比了在不同岩性不同气候条件下分形参数的分布特征。结果显示，二维分形参数与岩性、气候因素相关性不强。而分维值与构造活动因素相关性很好，在构造活动强烈区域分维值较低，在构造活动不强烈区域分维值较高。这说明分维值能在一定程度上反映构造活动的强弱，为研究区域构造活动提供了一种新的手段。

关键词: 分形参数, 构造活动, 滇西南块体

Abstract:

Geomorphology could record long-term accumulation of tectonic movement and quantify it by relevant parameters.But because the influences of other factors such as climate and lithology,how to use the relevant parameters to reveal the relationship between geomorphology and tectonics is a research hot spot.In this paper,we utilize the variogram method and the cellular fractal model to estimate parameters such as the fractal dimension (D) and ordinate intercept (γ) from the SRTM3 DEM using a moving window operation.We compare the distribution characteristics of the parameters in different climate and lithology.The results indicate that the correlation between the parameters and lithology or climate is very poor.The fractal dimension (D) reveals a very good correlation with tectonics,which is low in tectonically inactive areas and high in active areas.It implies that fractal dimension (D) may be a new method for research of regional tectonic movement.

Key words: fractal factors, tectonic activity, southwestern Yunnan block

中图分类号:

P315.2

石峰, 何宏林, Alexander L Densmore, 毕丽思, 魏占玉. 二维分形参数与构造活动关系研究——以滇西南块体为例[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(4): 862-873.

SHI Feng, HE Hong-lin, Alexander L Densmore, BI Li-si, WEI Zhan-yu. RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FRACTAL FACTORS AND TECTONIC ACTIVITY——A CASE STUDY OF SOUTHWESTERN YUNNAN BLOCK[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2016, 38(4): 862-873.

参考文献

毕丽思. 2011. 基于DEM的活动构造地貌参数研究. 北京:中国地震局地质研究所.
BI Li-si. 2011. A study on the geomorphologic indexes in active tectonics based on DEM data. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing(in Chinese).
毕丽思, 何宏林, 魏占玉, 等. 2011. 利用二维分形进行地貌定量分区研究:以鄂尔多斯块体及周边为例［J］. 第四纪研究, 31(1):1-12.
BI Li-si, HE Hong-lin, WEI Zhang-yu, et al. 2011. Study on the geomorphologic zonation by 2D fractal parameters:A case study of Ordos block and its surrounding area［J］. Quaternary Sciences, 31(1):1-12(in Chinese).
成永生. 2010. 九万大山地区断裂构造分形特征及其地质意义［J］. 中国地质, 37(1):127-133.
CHENG Yong-sheng. 2010. Fractal characteristics of fractures in Jiuwandashan area and their geological significance［J］. Geology in China, 37(1):127-133(in Chinese).
邓起东. 2007. 中国活动构造图. 北京:地震出版社.
DENG Qi-dong. 2007. Map of Active Tectonics in China. Seismological Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
龙毅, 周侗, 汤国安, 等, 2007. 典型黄土地貌类型区的地形复杂度分形研究［J］. 山地学报, 25(4):385-392.
LONG Yi, ZHOU Tong, TANG Guo-an, et al. 2007. Research on terrain complexity of several typical regions of loess landform based on fractal method［J］. Journal of Mountain Science, 25(4):385-392(in Chinese).
温彦良, 李胜. 2003. 分形理论在地质动力区划方法中的应用［J］. 辽宁工程技术大学学报. 22(增刊):21-22.
WENG Yan-liang, LI Sheng. 2003. Application of fractal theories in geo-dynamical division method［J］. Journal of Liaoning Technical University, 22(suppl):21-22(in Chinese).
张培震, 邓起东, 张国民, 等. 2003. 中国大陆强震活动与活动块体［J］. 中国科学(D辑), 33(增刊):12-20.
ZHANG Pei-zhen, DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Guo-min, et al. 2003. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China［J］. Science in China(Ser D), 46(Suppl):13-24.
周侗. 2007. DEM元分维模型的构建方法与应用研究. 南京:南京师范大学.
ZHOU Tong. 2007. Research on establishing method and application of meta fractal dimension model based on DEM. Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing(in Chinese).
Agterberg F P. 1982. Recent developments in geomathematics［J］. Geoprocessing, 2:1-32.
Bi L, He H, Wei Z, et al. 2012. Fractal properties of landforms in the Ordos Block and surrounding areas, China［J］. Geomorphology, 175-176:151-162.
Bull W B. 1977. Tectonic geomorphology of the Mojave Desert. US Geological Survey Contrast Report 14-08-001-G-394. Menlo Park, CA:Office of Earthquakes, Volcanoes, and Engineering.
Burbank D W, Anderson R S. 2012. Tectonic Geomorphology［M］. West Sussex, UK. Wiley-Blackwell.
Carr J R. 1997. Statistical self-affinity, fractal dimension, and geologic interpretation［J］. Engineering Geology, 48:269-282.
Carr J R, Benzer W B. 1991. On the practice of estimating fractal dimension［J］. Mathematical Geology, 23:945-958.
Chao P C. 1995. Landform simulation and the fractal properties of topography on Taiwan. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.
Chase C G. 1992. Fluvial landsculpting and the fractal dimension of topography［J］. Geomorphology, 5:39-57.
Cheng Y C, Lee P J, Lee T Y. 1999. Self-similarity dimensions of the Taiwan Island landscape［J］. Computers and Geosciences, 25:1043-1050.
Chris D. 2002. China Average Monthly or Annual Precipitation, 1961-90［M］. Spatial Climate Analysis Service at Oregon State University(SCAS/OSU).
Hack J T. 1973. Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index［J］. Journal of Research of the US Geological Survey, 1:421-429.
Hare P W, Gardner T W. 1985. Geomorphic indicator of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peniinsula, Costa Rica//Morisawa M and Hack J T(eds). Tectonic Geomorphology:Proceedings of the 15^th Annual Binghamton Geomorphology Symposium, September 1984. Boston:Allen and Unwin:75-104.
Howard A D, Kerby G. 1983. Channel changes in badlands［J］. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94:739-752.
Keller E A, Pinter N. 1996. Active Tectonics:Earthquake, Uplift, and Landscape, Upper Saddle River［M］. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Inc.
Keller E A, Printer N. 2002. Active Tectonics:Earthquake, Uplift, and Landscape［M］. New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Inc.
Klinkenberg B. 1992. Fractals and morphometric measures:Is there a relationship?［J］. Geomorphology, 5:5-20.
Klinkenberg B, Goodchild M F. 1992. The fractal properties of topography:A comparison of methods［J］. Earth Surface Processes and Landform, 17:214-217.
Krige D G. 1966. Two-dimensional weighted moving average trend surfaces for ore valuation［J］. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy:Symposium-Mathematical statistics and computer applications in ore evaluation, 67:13-79.
Mandelbrot B B. 1967. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension［J］. Science, 155:636-638.
Mark D M, Aronson P B. 1984. Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces:An empirical investigation, with application in geomorphology and computer mapping［J］. Mathematical Geology, 16:671-683.
Outcalt S I, Hinkel K M, Nelson F E. 1994. Fractal physiography［J］. Geomorphology, 11:91-106.
Strahler A N. 1952. Hypsomeric(area to altitude)analysis of erosional topography［J］. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 63:1117-1142.
Sung Q C, Chen Y C, 2004. Self-affinity dimensions of topography and its implications in morphotectonics:An example from Taiwan［J］. Geomorphology, 62:181-194.
Sung Q C, Chen Y C, Chao P C. 1998. Spatial variation of fractal parameters and its geological implications［J］. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 9(4):655-672.
Xu T, Moore I D, Gallant J C. 1993. Fractal, fractal dimensions and landscapes-A review［J］. Geomorphology, 8:245-262.

[1]	张文亮, 李营, 刘兆飞, 胡乐, 路畅, 陈志, 韩晓昆. 六盘山东麓断裂带土壤气体He浓度的空间分布特征及其与构造活动之间的关系[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 753-771.
[2]	朱治国, 祝意青, 王东振, 艾力夏提·玉山. 2020年伽师M_S6.4地震重力与地壳形变综合分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 269-285.
[3]	李昭, 付碧宏. 东昆仑断裂带玛沁-玛曲段晚第四纪构造活动特征的地貌响应定量研究[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1421-1447.
[4]	文翔, 周斌, 史水平, 覃坚, 李家宁, 何衍, 阎春恒, 罗远鹏. 桂西北地区近期重力与地壳形变综合分析[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(4): 927-943.
[5]	熊诚, 谢祖军, 郑勇, 熊熊, 艾三喜, 谢仁先. 大别—郯庐造山带地壳上地幔Rayleigh面波层析成像[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(1): 1-20.
[6]	田晴映, 郑文俊, 张冬丽, 张逸鹏, 许斌斌, 黄柳婷. 构造活动和气候变化对河流阶地发育的影响——以祁连山北缘洪水坝河和马营河为例[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(6): 1283-1296.
[7]	韩竹军, Nicola Litchfield, 冉洪流, 袁仁茂, 郭鹏, Robert M Langridge, Russ J Van Dissen. 新西兰2016年凯库拉M_W7.8地震地表破裂带特征初析[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 675-688.
[8]	祝意青, 梁伟锋, 郝明, 赵凌强, 郝庆花, 张国庆, 刘练. 青藏高原东北缘近期重力与地壳形变综合分析与研究[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 768-780.
[9]	高帅坡, 冉勇康, 吴富峣, 徐良鑫, 王虎, 梁明剑. 利用无人机摄影测量技术提取复杂冲积扇面构造活动信息——以新疆巴里坤盆地南缘冲积扇面为例[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(4): 793-804.
[10]	高战武, 徐杰, 赵铁虎, 张进, 计凤桔, 周本刚. 营口-潍坊断裂带新构造和新构造活动的再认识[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(1): 43-53.
[11]	苏琦, 袁道阳, 谢虹. 祁连山-河西走廊黑河流域地貌特征及其构造意义[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(3): 560-581.
[12]	苏鹏, 田勤俭, 梁朋, 李文巧, 王林. 基于青衣江变形河流阶地研究龙门山断裂带南段的构造活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(3): 523-545.
[13]	祝意青, 付广裕, 梁伟锋, 徐云马. 鲁甸M_S6.5、芦山M_S7.0、汶川M_S8.0地震前区域重力场时变[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(1): 319-330.
[14]	陈顺云, 马瑾, 刘培洵, 刘力强, 扈小燕, 任雅琼. 利用卫星遥感热场信息探索现今构造活动：以汶川地震为例[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(3): 775-793.
[15]	祝意青, 赵云峰, 李铁明, 梁伟锋, 徐云马, 郭树松. 2013年甘肃岷县漳县6.6级地震前后重力场动态变化[J]. 地震地质, 2014, 36(3): 667-676.

二维分形参数与构造活动关系研究——以滇西南块体为例

RESEARCH ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FRACTAL FACTORS AND TECTONIC ACTIVITY——A CASE STUDY OF SOUTHWESTERN YUNNAN BLOCK

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价