华北平原北部徐水南断裂和牛东断裂晚第四纪活动性——来自钻孔联合地质剖面的证据

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.20240075

地震地质 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 19-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.20240075

华北平原北部徐水南断裂和牛东断裂晚第四纪活动性——来自钻孔联合地质剖面的证据

黄雄南¹⁾(), 杨晓平¹⁾^,^*, 刘保金²⁾, 石峰¹⁾, 庄其天³⁾, 郝海健¹⁾, 石金虎²⁾, 孙浩越¹⁾, 鲁人齐¹⁾, 胡宗凯¹⁾, 李康¹⁾, 曹筠¹^,⁴⁾, 疏鹏¹⁾, 任光雪¹⁾, 王振南¹⁾

¹⁾ 地震动力学与强震预测全国重点实验室(中国地震局地质研究所), 北京 100029
²⁾ 中国地震局地球物理勘探中心, 郑州 450002
³⁾ 中国电建集团昆明勘测设计研究院有限公司, 昆明 650000
⁴⁾ 河北省地震局, 石家庄 050021

收稿日期:2025-05-31 修回日期:2025-10-24 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-03-14
通讯作者: * 杨晓平, 男, 1962年生, 研究员, 主要研究方向为活动构造及地震危险性评价, E-mail: yangxiaoping-1@163.com。
作者简介:
黄雄南, 男, 1974年生, 2003年于北京大学获构造地质学专业博士学位, 副研究员, 主要研究方向为活动构造与地震地质, E-mail: xiongnan_h@sohu.com。
基金资助:
中国地震局地质研究所基本科研业务专项(IGCEA1902)

LATE-QUATERNARY ACTIVITY OF THE XUSHUI SOUTH FAULT AND NIUDONG FAULT IN THE NORTH OF THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN, EVIDENCE FROM DRILLING

HUANG Xiong-nan¹⁾(), YANG Xiao-ping¹⁾^,^*, LIU Bao-jin²⁾, SHI Feng¹⁾, ZHUANG Qi-tian³⁾, HAO Hai-jian¹⁾, SHI Jin-hu²⁾, SUN Hao-yue¹⁾, LU Ren-qi¹⁾, HU Zong-kai¹⁾, LI Kang¹⁾, CAO Jun¹^,⁴⁾, SHU Peng¹⁾, REN Guang-xue¹⁾, WANG Zhen-nan¹⁾

¹⁾ State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics and Forecasting, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
²⁾ Geophysical Exploration Center, China Earthquake Administration, Zhengzhou 450002, China
³⁾ POWER CHINA Kunming Engineering Corporation Limited, Yunnan 650000, China
⁴⁾ Hebei Earthquake Agency, Shijiazhuang 050021, China

Received:2025-05-31 Revised:2025-10-24 Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-03-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

华北平原新生代正断裂大多在晚更新世以来停止活动, 但大量历史强震震中却位于这些隐伏断裂的附近。那么, 强震是先存正断裂的继续活动还是新生断裂造成的?文中通过钻孔探测结合年代学测定, 研究雄安新区徐水南断裂和牛东断裂晚第四纪活动性, 探讨华北平原区新生代先存正断裂的继承性活动及其机制。钻孔联合剖面探测确定徐水南断裂中段和牛东断裂中段东支的上断点分别深约24m和42m。测年结果表明, 断裂分别在距今约20ka和36ka仍然活动, 皆为晚更新世断层。结合浅层地震勘探, 可知徐水南断裂和牛东断裂晚更新世之后活动性减弱, 仅在中段活动。徐水南断裂和牛东断裂作为容城凸起和牛驼镇凸起的边界断层, 其深部具有特殊的岩石圈结构, 断裂易于积累应变, 且又为深部流体通道, 虽然晚第四纪以来活动性减弱, 但仍有可能被触发, 从而发生强震。

关键词: 钻孔联合剖面, 断裂活动性, 雄安新区, 华北平原

Abstract:

Since the Late Pleistocene, the North China Plain, far from plate boundaries, has experienced a transformation in its geodynamic environment, with most pre-existing normal faults no longer adapting to the new tectonic stress field and thus becoming inactive. However, historical and modern earthquake catalogues indicate that the epicenters of many strong earthquakes occur near pre-existing buried normal faults on the North China Plain. There is currently a debate over whether strong earthquakes are caused by the continued activity of these pre-existing faults or by new faults.

The Xiong'an New Area is located in the northern part of the North China Plain. Based on seismic reflection profiles and drilling studies, previous studies suggest that some pre-existing faults in this region were active into the early Quaternary but have been inactive since the Late Pleistocene. Relevant research lacked evidence from high-precision composite drilling profile investigations, making the conclusion about inactivity since the Late Pleistocene questionable. The crust-mantle structure in this area is unique, the mantle is uplifted and there is deep fluid convection along pre-existing faults, which is similar to typical intraplate seismic zones in the world, such as the New Madrid area in the United States. The epicenter of the M5¾ earthquake in 1679 was located in the study area. The determination of the latest active age of the fault is of great significance for the seismic hazard assessment of Xiong'an New Area and further research is needed. In this paper, based on shallow seismic exploration, we analyze the burial depth of the upbreakpoints of the Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault in the Xiong'an New Area using a composite drilling profile method, and then determine fault activity using Quaternary dating methods.

The targeted shallow reflection seismic explorationwith survey lines laid across the Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault has confirmed that the upper breakpoints of the middle section of the Xushui South Fault and the eastern branch of the middle section of the Niudong Fault are both at a depth of about 80 meters or less. This result may indicate the Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault were active during the Late Pleistocene. Perpendicular to the projection traces of the upper breakpoints of these two faults, two composite drilling profiles were arranged with boreholes on both sides of the shallowest identified upper breakpoints. They are named as the Rongcheng drilling profile and Xiongxian drilling profile, respectively. The drilling profiles consist of 5 and 4 drill holes, respectively, and the final hole depth is approximately 150 meters for both. The average hole separations were 23.3m and 30.4m respectively.

Based on material composition, particle size, color and consolidation degree, etc., we divided and recorded 104 and 112 units respectively for the two rows of drilling cores at the drilling site. After a comprehensive analysis, the detailed units mentioned above are reclassified and combined into 8 and 9 stratigraphic units, according to sedimentary cycles, sedimentary facies and other characteristics, and in combination with the dating results. These units cover the Holocene to the low Pleistocene series. The systematic throws of the top and bottom boundaries of the stratigraphic units and the fault zone structures preserved in the core led to the recognition of two normal faults in both the Rongcheng and Xiongxian drilling profiles. The faults in the Rongcheng profile have an up-breakpoint buried approximately 24m deep and the vertical offset of the base of the Upper Pleistocene is 15.15m. For the Xiongxian drilling line, the buried depth of the up-breakpoint of the faults is about 42m, with a vertical offset at the base of the Upper Pleistocene of 9.1m. The dating results of the samples collected near the up-breakpoints suggest that the middle segment of the Xushui South Fault and the eastern branch of the Niudong Fault were still active around approximately 20,000 years and 36,000 years ago, respectively, indicating they are Late Pleistocene faults.

Since the Paleogene, the Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault have been active as bounding normal faults for the Rongcheng Uplift and the Niutuo Town Uplift, with their lower endpoints reaching depths of approximately 20 kilometers. The lithosphere beneath these faults exhibits a cold crust and a warm mantle, with a slight bulge in the upper mantle. The Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault serve as conduits for the ascent of deep fluids and heat. The geothermal gradient in the uplifted areas is notably higher than in the surrounding subsiding basins. Our work indicates that these faults remained active in a normal faulting mode at the end of the Late Pleistocene. Combined with previous shallow seismic exploration, it’s suggested that the Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault were only active in their central segments after the Late Pleistocene.

Although the activity of these faults has diminished since the Late Quaternary, their deep-seated environment is similar to that of the New Madrid Seismic Zone in the United States, where a soft, warm upper mantle contacts a cooler, harder crust, and uneven crustal density leads to stress accumulation preferentially along pre-existing faults. Additionally, these faults act as pathways for deep fluids, which can trigger strong earthquakes.

The continued activity of the Xushui South Fault and the Niudong Fault at the end of the Late Pleistocene is related to their deep-seated environment. Some historical strong earthquakes in the North China Plain may have been triggered by reactivation of pre-existing faults with similar characteristics.

Key words: composite drilling profile, fault activity, Xiong'an, North China Plain

黄雄南, 杨晓平, 刘保金, 石峰, 庄其天, 郝海健, 石金虎, 孙浩越, 鲁人齐, 胡宗凯, 李康, 曹筠, 疏鹏, 任光雪, 王振南. 华北平原北部徐水南断裂和牛东断裂晚第四纪活动性——来自钻孔联合地质剖面的证据[J]. 地震地质, 2026, 48(1): 19-42.

HUANG Xiong-nan, YANG Xiao-ping, LIU Bao-jin, SHI Feng, ZHUANG Qi-tian, HAO Hai-jian, SHI Jin-hu, SUN Hao-yue, LU Ren-qi, HU Zong-kai, LI Kang, CAO Jun, SHU Peng, REN Guang-xue, WANG Zhen-nan. LATE-QUATERNARY ACTIVITY OF THE XUSHUI SOUTH FAULT AND NIUDONG FAULT IN THE NORTH OF THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN, EVIDENCE FROM DRILLING[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2026, 48(1): 19-42.

图/表 9

图1 华北平原北部第四纪断裂分布图(根据李峰等,2022改) ①山西裂谷断裂带; ②太行山山前断裂带; ③新乡-商丘断裂带; ④聊兰断裂; ⑤ 郯庐断裂带

Fig. 1 Distribution map of Quaternary faults of the North China Plain(modified by LI Feng et al., 2022).

图2 雄安新区第四纪断裂分布(a)、构造单元分布(b)和构造剖面图(c) a 地层露头分布根据杜亚楠等(2023)改绘。断层位置根据中国地震局地球物理勘探中心(2017)和李峰等(2022)改绘。新近系底板等深线根据朱思雨等(2022)改绘, 单位为m。钻孔①原编号GB014(刘开明等, 2020), ②、 ③、 ⑤和⑥的原编号分别为D16、 D18、 XSZK09和AXZK07(商世杰等, 2019), 钻孔④的原编号为雄6(曹朋军等, 2020), 钻孔⑦的原编号为XA3(钱施, 2023)。钻孔号右侧数字为第四系底界埋深, 单位为m。b 构造单元分布根据何登发等(2018)和戴明刚等(2023)改绘。c 构造剖面根据戴明刚等(2023)改绘, 第四纪断层依据中国地震局地球物理勘探中心(2017)改绘

Fig. 2 Distribution map of Quaternary faults(a), distribution of structural units and structure profiles(b) of the Xiong'an new area.

图3 容城排钻钻孔布设平面图(a)、岩心现场照片(b)、 XA7-2p测线时间剖面(c)、解释剖面(d)和排钻钻孔布设剖面图(e) 图中浅勘地震测线解释剖面引自中国地震局地球物理勘探中心(2017)

Fig. 3 Distribution map of boreholes in Rongcheng(a), photograph of the core array(b), time-section(c), and interpretation(d) of the XA7-2p shallow seismic exploration line and the vertical layout of the boreholes(e).

图4 雄县XA3测线(a)、排钻钻孔布设平面图(b)、岩心现场照片(c)、 XA3p测线时间剖面(d)、解释剖面(e)和剖面图(f) 图中浅勘地震测线解释剖面引自中国地震局地球物理勘探中心(2017)

Fig. 4 The XA3 shallow seismic exploration profile(a), distribution map of boreholes in Xiongxian(b), photograph of the core array(c), time-section(d) and interpretation(e) of the XA3p shallow seismic exploration line and the vertical layout of the boreholes(f).

表1 雄安新区钻孔联合剖面样品年龄测年结果

Table1 Test results of the dating samples from Xiong'an composite drilling sections

孔号	样品埋深/m	地层单元	样品岩性	测年方法	测年结果
R-2	10.55	UR2	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(19701±194)a BP
R-2	20.0	UR3	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(23220±250)a BP
R-2	35.9	UR3	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(24359±217)a BP
R-2	50.1	UR4	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(38206±620)a BP
R-2	62.60	UR4	粉砂	OSL	(51.3±4.8)ka
R-2	69.20	UR4	细砂	OSL	(61.0±5.3)ka
R-2	79.00	UR6	粉砂	OSL	(155.1±15.8)ka
R-2	89.60	UR6	粉砂	OSL	(158.4±21.2)ka
R-2	90.9	UR6	粉砂	ESR	(378±60)ka
R-2	101.6	UR6	砂	ESR	(466±72)ka
R-2	114.4	UR6	砂	ESR	(425±77)ka
R-2	123.9	UR6	粉细砂	ESR	(489±103)ka
R-2	136.5	UR6	粉砂	ESR	(501±88)ka
R-2	142.4	UR6	细砂	ESR	(758±222)ka
XA-3	3.7	UX1	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(3851±121)a BP
XA-3	7.15	UX1	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(7379±60)a BP
XA-3	39.5	UX3	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(35855±420)a BP
XA-3	54.8	UX5	有机沉积物	¹⁴C	(43718±778)a BP
XA-3	82.70	UX6	粉砂	OSL	(143.8±19.6)ka
XA-3	94.4	UX7	粉细砂	ESR	(441±56)ka
XA-3	110.4	U8	细砂	ESR	(468±52)ka
XA-3	141.6	U8	中细砂	ESR	(738±215)ka

图5 容城钻孔联合地质剖面

Fig. 5 Composite drilling geological profile for the Rongcheng site.

图6 雄县钻孔联合地质剖面

Fig. 6 Composite drilling geological profile for the Xiongxian site.

图7 容城钻孔R-3断层带岩心照片 a R-3钻孔106.40~108.20m深度的岩心照片, 黑色框为图c位置, 红色箭头指示断面位置(下同)。b R-3钻孔106.40~108.20m深度的岩心构造图, 红色线为断层, 浅黄色为粉细砂, 橘黄色为黏土, 白色为钙结核。c 断面细节照片, 黄色方框为图d位置。可见断面平直截然; 越靠近断层, 钙结核粒径越小, 显示出断层带内的破碎和碾磨作用。d 主断层擦痕面照片。擦痕清晰, 其走向与孔壁近平行, 表明断层运动以倾向运动为主

Fig. 7 Photos of the fault face revealed by the R-3 borehole in Rongcheng.

图8 雄安新区徐水南断裂和牛东断裂浅层地震测线分布测线号之后括号内的数字为道间距, 测线之上的数字为上断点埋深, 单位皆为m

Fig. 8 Locations of shallow seismic profile survey lines on the Xushuinan Fault and Niudong Fault, Xiong'an New Area.

参考文献 62

[2]	CHEN Ting-ting, YANG Zhen-jing, LIU Rong-fang, et al. 2017. Grain size characteristics and sedimentary environment analysis of Baiyangdian ZK-1 borehole since Late Pleistocene[J]. Journal of Hebei GEO University, 40(6): 1—7 (in Chinese).
[3]	陈望和, 倪明云. 1987. 河北第四纪地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社.
	CHEN Wang-he, NI ming-yun. 1987. Quaternary Geology of Hebei[M]. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
[4]	戴明刚, 孙彭光, 雷海飞, 等. 2023. 雄安新区地层及主要热储空间结构特征与地热水资源潜力[J]. 地质科学, 58(2): 412—437.
	DAI Ming-gang, SUN Peng-guang, LEI Hai-fei, et al. 2023. Spatial distribution characteristics of strata and main thermal reservoirs and geothermal water resource potential in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 58(2): 412—437 (in Chinese).
[5]	戴明刚, 汪新伟, 刘金侠, 等. 2019. 雄安新区起步区及周边地热资源特征与影响因素[J]. 地质科学, 54(1): 176—191.
	DAI Ming-gang, WANG Xin-wei, LIU Jin-xia, et al. 2019. Characteristics and influence factors of geothermal resources in the starting and adjacent zone of Xiong'an New Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 54(1): 176—191 (in Chinese).
[6]	代鹏, 邓晓红, 王盛栋, 等. 2022. 永定河冲积平原南部第四纪年代地层划分及沉积速率特征[J]. 地质通报, 41(2-3): 253—261.
	DAI Peng, DENG Xiao-hong, WANG Sheng-dong, et al. 2022. Quaternary chronostratigraphic division and sedimentary rate characteristics in the south alluvia plain of Yongding River[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 41(2-3): 253—261 (in Chinese).
[7]	邓起东, 张培震, 冉勇康, 等. 2003. 中国活动构造与地震活动[J]. 地学前缘, 10(S1): 66—73.
	DENG Qi-dong, ZHANG Pei-zhen, RAN Yong-kang, et al. 2003. Active tectonics and earthquake activities in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 10(S1): 66—73 (in Chinese).
[8]	杜亚楠, 李传金, 朱辉云, 等. 2023. 雄安新区岩土标准地层序列划分[J]. 地质通报, 42(9): 1494—1504.
	DU Ya-nan, LI Chuang-jin, ZHU Hui-yun, et al. 2023. Research on sequence division of geotechnical standard strata in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(9): 1494—1504 (in Chinese).
[9]	高战武, 吴昊, 李光涛, 等. 2014. 太行山山前断裂带中北段晚第四纪活动性研究[J]. 震灾防御技术, 9(2): 159—170.
	GAO Zhan-wu, WU Hao, LI Guang-tao, et al. 2014. Late Quaternary activity of the central-north segment of Taihang Mountain Piedmont fault zone[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 9(2): 159—170 (in Chinese).
[10]	顾功叙. 1983. 中国地震目录(公元前1831年—公元1969年)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	GU Gong-xu. 1983. Catalogue of Chinese Earthquakes[M]. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[11]	国家地震局震害防御司编. 1995. 中国历史强震目录(公元前23世纪—公元1911年)[M]. 北京: 地震出版社.
	Earthquake Disaster Prevention Department, State Seismological Bureau. 1995. Catalogue of Chinese Strong Historical Earthquakes[M]. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[12]	韩博, 夏雨波, 马震, 等. 2023. 雄安新区工程地质层组划分、三维地质结构构建及其在城市规划建设中的应用[J]. 中国地质, 50(6): 1903—1918.
	HAN Bo, XIA Yu-bo, MA Zhen, et al. 2023. Evaluation on geological suitability of development and utilization of underground space resources in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Geology in China, 50(6): 1903—1918 (in Chinese).
[13]	河北省区域地质矿产调查研究所. 2017. 中国区域地质志(河北志)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社.
	Hebei Institute of Regional and Mineral Resource Survey. 2017. Regional Geology of Hebei Province, China[M]. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
[14]	何登发, 单帅强, 张煜颖, 等. 2018. 雄安新区的三维地质结构: 来自反射地震资料的约束[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 48(9): 1207—1222.
	HE Deng-fa, SHAN Shuai-qiang, ZHANG Yu-ying, et al. 2018. 3-D geologic architecture of Xiong'an New Area: Constraints from seismic reflection data[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 48(9): 1207—1222 (in Chinese).
[15]	何乃华, 朱宣清. 1992. 白洋淀地区近3万年来的古环境与历史上人类活动的影响[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 12(2): 79—88.
	HE Nai-hua, ZHU Xuan-qing. 1992. Palaeoenvironment changes since 30000aBP and effects of human activities in the Baiyangdian area[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 12(2): 79—88 (in Chinese).
[16]	江娃利. 2006. 有关华北平原强震发震构造问题的讨论[J]. 中国地震, 22(2): 135—141.
	JIANG Wa-li. 2006. Discussion on Problems for Seismo-tectonics of Strong Earthquakes in the North China Plain[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 22(2): 135—141 (in Chinese).
[17]	李传友, 汪一鹏, 王志才. 2007. 中国东部城市地区隐伏断裂上断点与最新活动时代关系的初步分析: 以邢台、唐山地震区为例[J]. 地震地质, 29(2): 431—445.
	LI Chuan-you, WANG Yi-peng, WANG Zhi-cai. 2007. Some analyse on the relation between the upper offset point and the latest activity time of buried faults in cities of eastern China: Taking the Xingtai and Tangshan earthquake regions as an example[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29(2): 431—445 (in Chinese).
[18]	李峰, 张杰汉, 卢巍, 等. 2022. 黄河中下游活动断层分布及其对古河道变迁的影响[J]. 震灾防御技术, 17(2): 197—207.
	LI Feng, ZHANG Jie-han, LU Wei, et al. 2022. The distribution of active faults in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River and its influence on the change of palaeostream[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 17(2): 197—207 (in Chinese).
[19]	李三忠, 索艳慧, 戴黎明, 等. 2010. 渤海湾盆地形成与华北克拉通破坏[J]. 地学前缘, 17(4): 64—89.
	LI San-zhong, SUO Yan-hui, DAI Li-ming, et al. 2010. Development of the Bohai Bay Basin and destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 17(4): 64—89 (in Chinese).
[20]	刘开明, 胥勤勉, 段连峰, 等. 2020. 雄安新区西部GB014孔第四纪地层结构与演化过程[J]. 科学通报, 65(20): 2145—2160.
	LIU Kai-ming, XU Qin-mian, DUAN Lian-feng, et al. 2020. Quaternary stratigraphic architecture and sedimentary evolution from borehole GB014 in the western Xiong'an New Area[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 65(20): 2145—2160 (in Chinese).
[21]	刘立军, 徐海振, 崔秋苹, 等. 2010. 河北平原第四纪地层划分研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 26(2): 53—57.
	LIU Li-jun, XU Hai-zhen, CUI Qiu-ping, et al. 2010. Study on Quaternary stratigraphic division on Hebei Plain[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 26(2): 53—57 (in Chinese).
[22]	马岩, 张保建, 闫金凯, 等. 2022. 雄安新区深部储热构造探测研究与地热井优选技术[J]. 地球学报, 43(5): 699—710.
	MA Yan, ZHANG Bao-jian, YAN Jin-kai, et al. 2022. Deep geothermal reservoir structure detection and geothermal well optimization technology in Xiong'an New Area[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 43(5): 699—710 (in Chinese).
[23]	钱施. 2023. 中国东部晚新生代以来水热格局的演化: 来自地质脂类的证据[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学.
	QIAN Shi. 2023. Evolution of hydrothermal patterns in eastern China since Late Cenozoic: Evidence from geological lipids[D]. China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (in Chinese).
[24]	全国地层委员会. 2001. 中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书[M]. 北京: 地质出版社:1—59.
	National Commission on Stratigraphy of China. 2001. Stratigraphical Guide of China and its Explanation[M]. Geological Publishing House, Beijing: 1—59 (in Chinese).
[25]	全国地层委员会. 2017. 中国地层指南及中国地层指南说明书(2016年版)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社. 1—62.
	National Commission on Stratigraphy of China. 2017. Stratigraphical Guide of China and its Explanation(2016)[M]. Geological Publishing House, Beijing: 1—62 (in Chinese).
[26]	商世杰, 丰成君, 谭成轩, 等. 2019. 雄安新区附近主要隐伏断裂第四纪活动性研究[J]. 地球学报, 40(6): 836—846.
	SHANG Shi-jie, FENG Cheng-jun, TAN Cheng-xuan, et al. 2019. Quaternary activity study of major buried faults near Xiong'an New Area[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 40(6): 836—846 (in Chinese).
[27]	申改慧, 丁国强, 阳小兰, 等. 2018. 白洋淀地区全新世以来的气候环境变化[J]. 第四纪研究, 38(3): 756—768.
	SHEN Gai-hui, DING Guo-qiang, YANG Xiao-lan, et al. 2018. Holocene climate and environmental change in the Baiyangdian area[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 38(3): 756—768 (in Chinese).
[28]	王凯. 2022. 基于综合地球物理探测的雄安新区地热地质结构及深部热源机制研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学.
	WANG Kai. 2022. Study on the geothermal geological structure and deep geothermal source mechanism of Xiong'an New Area based on comprehensive geophysical exploration[D]. Jilin University, Changchun (in Chinese).
[29]	王强, 刘立军, 徐海振, 等. 2003. 华北平原第四系下限的再研究[J]. 地质调查与研究, 26(1): 52—60.
	WANG Qiang, LIU Li-jun, XU Hai-zhen, et al. 2003. Re-study on the lower boundary of Quaternary system in the North China Plain[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 26(1): 52—60 (in Chinese).
[30]	汪新伟, 郭世炎, 高楠安, 等. 2023. 雄安新区牛东断裂带碳酸盐岩热储探测及其对地热勘探的启示[J]. 地质通报, 42(1): 14—26.
	WANG Xin-wei, GUO Shi-yan, GAO Nan-an, et al. 2023. Detection of carbonate geothermal reservoir in Niudong fault zone of Xiong'an New area and its geothermal exploration significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(1): 14—26 (in Chinese).
[31]	王永, 闵隆瑞, 董进, 等. 2015. 河北白洋淀全新统沉积特征与地层划分[J]. 地球学报, 36(5): 575—582.
	WANG Yong, MIN Long-rui, DONG Jin, et al. 2015. Sedimentary characteristics and stratigraphic division of Holocene Series in Baiyang Dian, Hebei Provence[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 36(5): 575—582 (in Chinese).
[32]	吴忱, 许清海. 1998. “演化阶段”与“成因”不能混为一谈:也谈白洋淀的成因[J]. 湖泊科学, 10(3): 91—96.
	WU Chen, XU Qing-hai. 1998. Formation or development stage: A discussion on the cause of the formation of Baiyangdian Lake, China[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 10(3): 91—96 (in Chinese).
[33]	徐杰, 方仲景, 杨理华. 1988. 1966年邢台7.2级地震的构造背景和发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 10(4): 51—59.
	XU Jie, FANG Zhong-jing, YANG Li-hua. 1988. Tectonic background and causative of 1966 Xingtai M_S7.2 earthquake[J]. Seismology and Geology, 10(4): 51—59 (in Chinese).
[34]	徐杰, 高战武, 孙建宝, 等. 2001. 区域伸展体制下盆-山构造耦关系的探讨——以渤海湾盆地和太行山为例[J]. 地质学报, 75(2): 165—174.
	XU Jie, GAO Zhan-wu, SUN Jian-bao, et al. 2001. A preliminary study of the coupling relationship between basin and mountain in extension environments: A case study of the Bohai Bay Basin and Taihang Mountain[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 75(2): 165—174 (in Chinese).
[35]	徐锡伟, 白鸾曦, 魏雷鸣, 等. 2019. 华北克拉通破坏区最新构造运动起始时间讨论[J]. 地球科学, 44(5): 1647—1660.
	XU Xi-wei, BAI Luan-xi, WEI Lei-ming, et al. 2019. Discussion on initiation time of the latest tectonic movement in break-up region of the North China Craton[J]. Earth Science, 44(5): 1647—1660 (in Chinese).
[36]	徐锡伟, 于贵华, 王峰, 等. 2000. 1966年邢台地震群的发震构造模型:新生断层形成?先存活断层摩擦黏滑?[J]. 中国地震, 16(4): 364—378.
	XU Xi-wei, YU Gui-hua, WANG Feng, et al. 2000. Seismogenic model for the 1966 Xingtai earthquakes: Nucleation of new-born fault or strick-slip of pre-existing fault?[J]. Earthquake Research in China, 16(4): 364—378 (in Chinese).
[37]	杨慧君, 王永, 迟振卿, 等. 2015. 河北白洋淀老河头剖面25.5kaBP以来气候环境变化的沉积记录[J]. 现代地质, 29(2): 291—298.
	YANG Hui-jun, WANG Yong, CHI Zhen-qing, et al. 2015. Sedimentary record of climate change during the past 25.5ka of Laohetou profile from Baiyangdian, Hebei Province[J]. Geoscience, 29(2): 291—298 (in Chinese).
[38]	于长春, 乔日新, 张迪硕. 2017. 雄安新区航磁推断的三维基底构造特征[J]. 物探与化探, 41(3): 385—391.
	YU Chang-chun, QIAO Ri-xing, ZHANG Di-shuo. 2017. The basement tectonic characteristics from interpretation of aeromagnetic data in Xiong'an region[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 41(3): 385—391 (in Chinese).
[39]	岳航羽, 王凯, 王小江, 等. 2023. 深地震反射剖面揭示的雄安新区及外围地壳精细结构与构造特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 51(12): 106—115.
	YUE Hang-yu, WANG Kai, WANG Xiao-jiang, et al. 2023. Revealing fine-scale crustal structure and tectonic features in the Xiong'an New Area and its periphery using deep seismic reflection profiling[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 51(12): 106—115 (in Chinese).
[40]	张保卫, 岳航羽, 谢伟, 等. 2022. 反射地震在冀中坳陷保定凹陷精细地质结构探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 46(6): 1359—1368.
	ZHANG Bao-wei, YUE Hang-yu, XIE Wei, et al. 2022. Application of the seismic reflection method in detecting the fine-scale geological structure of the Baoding sag, Jizhong depression[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 46(6): 1359—1368 (in Chinese).
[41]	张世民, 吕悦军, 任俊杰. 2006. 华北平原强震构造带与潜在震源区划分[J]. 震灾防御技术, 1(3): 234—244.
	ZHANG Shi-min, LÜ Yue-jun, REN Jun-jie. 2006. Seismotectonics and potential seismic source zonation of the North China Plain[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 1(3): 234—244 (in Chinese).
[42]	张岳桥, 施炜, 董树文. 2019. 华北新构造: 印欧碰撞远场效应与太平洋俯冲地幔上涌之间的相互作用[J]. 地质学报, 93(5): 971—1001.
	ZHANG Yue-qiao, SHI Wei, DONG Shu-wen. 2019. Neotectonics of North China: Interplay between far-field effect of India-Eurasia collision and Pacific subduction related deep-seated mantle upwelling[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 93(5): 971—1001 (in Chinese).
[43]	赵勇, 王强, 李瑞杰, 等. 2018. 北京平原区南部PGZ01孔第四纪地层划分及其环境意义[J]. 古地理学报, 20(2): 337—348.
	ZHAO Yong, WANG Qiang, LI Rui-jie, et al. 2018. Quaternary stratigraphic division and its environmental significance of Borehole PGZ01 in southern Beijing plain area[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 20(2): 337—348 (in Chinese).
[44]	中国地震局地球物理勘探中心. 2017. 雄安新区活动断层探测浅层地震勘探工作报告[R]. 郑州: 中国地震局地球物理勘探中心.
	Geophysical Exploration Center, China Earthquake Administration. 2017. Shallow seismic exploration work report for active fault detection in Xiong'an New Area[R]. Geophysical Exploration Center, China Earthquake Administration, Zhengzhou (in Chinese).
	中国地震局震害防御司编. 1999. 中国近代地震目录(1912—1990年, M_S≥4.7)[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社.
	Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, China Earthquake Administration. 1999. Catalogue of Chinese modern earthquakes(1912—1990, M_S≥4.7)[M]. Chinese Science and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[46]	中国地震台网中心. 2024. 历史查询[DB/OL][2024-05-27]. http://www.ceic.ac.cn/history.
	China Earthquake Networks Center. 2024. History inquiry[DB/OL][2024-05-27]. http://www.ceic.ac.cn/history in Chinese).
[47]	朱日祥, 徐义刚. 2009. 西太平洋板块俯冲与华北克拉通破坏[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 49(9): 1346—1356.
	ZHU Ri-xiang, XU Yi-gang. 2009. The subduction of the west Pacific plate and the destruction of the North China Craton[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 49(9): 1346—1356 (in Chinese).
[48]	朱思雨, 丰成君, 谭成轩, 等. 2022. 雄安容城深热储层回灌注水诱发断层失稳危险性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 41(S1): 2735—2756.
	ZHU Si-yu, FENG Cheng-jun, TAN Cheng-xuan, et al. 2022. Fault slip potential induced by water injection in the Rongcheng deep-seated geothermal reservoir, Xiong'an New Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41(S1): 2735—2756 (in Chinese).
[49]	Allen M B, Macdonald D I M, Xun Z, et al. 1997. Early Cenozoic two-phase extension and late Cenozoic thermal subsidence and inversion of the Bohai Basin, northern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 14(7-8): 951—972.
[50]	Calais E, Camelbeeck T, Stein S, et al. 2016. A new paradigm for large earthquakes in stable continental plate interiors[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20): 10621—10637.
[51]	Calais E, Freed A M, Arsdale R V, et al. 2010. Triggering of New Madrid seismicity by Late-Pleistocene erosion[J]. Nature, 466(7306): 608—611.
[52]	Calais E, Stein S. 2009. Time-variable deformation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone[J]. Science, 323(5920): 1442.
[53]	Chen C X, Zhao D P, Wu S G. 2014. Crust and upper mantle structure of the New Madrid Seismic Zone: Insight into intraplate earthquakes[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 230: 1—14.
[54]	Cohen K M, Finney S C, Gibbard P L, et al. 2013. The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart[J]. Episodes, 36(3): 199—204.
[55]	Ju Y W, Yu K, Wang G Z, et al. 2021. Coupling response of the Meso-Cenozoic differential evolution of the North China Craton to lithospheric structural transformation[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 223:103859.
[56]	Levandowski W, Boyd O S, Ramirez-Guzmán L. 2016. Dense lower crust elevates long-term earthquake rates in the New Madrid seismic zone[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(16): 8499—8510.
[57]	Mandal P. 2019. A possible origin of intraplate earthquakes in the Kachchh rift zone, India, since the 2001 M_W7.7 Bhuj earthquake[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 170: 56—72.
[58]	Pang J M, Pang Z H, Lü M, et al. 2018. Geochemical and isotopic characteristics of fluids in the Niutuozhen geothermal field, North China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(1): 12.
[59]	Wang M, Shen Z K. 2020. Present-day crustal deformation of continental China derived from GPS and its tectonic implications[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2): e2019JB018774.
[1]	曹朋军, 黄忠峰, 杨学明, 等. 2020. 浅层地震勘探在牛东断裂探测中的应用[J]. 勘察科学技术, (2): 53—56.
	CAO Peng-jun, HUANG Zhong-feng, YANG Xue-ming, et al. 2020. Application of shallow seismic exploration in Niudong Fault[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, (2): 53—56 (in Chinese).
[2]	陈亭亭, 杨振京, 刘荣访, 等. 2017. 白洋淀ZK-1钻孔晚更新世以来的粒度特征及其沉积环境分析[J]. 河北地质大学学报, 40(6): 1—7.
[60]	Wang S, Xu W, Xu C, et al. 2019. Changes in groundwater level possibly encourage shallow earthquakes in central Australia: The 2016 Petermann Ranges earthquake[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(6): 3189—3198.
[61]	Wang W, Zhao B, Qiao X, et al. 2022. Block kinematics in North China from GPS measurements[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 23(3): e2021GC010216.
[62]	Zhan Y, Hou G T, Kusky T, et al. 2016. Stress development in heterogenetic lithosphere: Insights into earthquake processes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone[J]. Tectonophysics, 671: 56—62.

华北平原北部徐水南断裂和牛东断裂晚第四纪活动性——来自钻孔联合地质剖面的证据

LATE-QUATERNARY ACTIVITY OF THE XUSHUI SOUTH FAULT AND NIUDONG FAULT IN THE NORTH OF THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN, EVIDENCE FROM DRILLING

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 62

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王江, 陈志, 张帆, 张志相, 张素欣. 雄安新区主要断裂带土壤气体的Rn与CO₂脱气特征[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 735-752.
[2]	韩晓飞, 史双双, 董斌, 薛晓东, 范雪芳. 田庄断裂变形带的演化机制分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(3): 795-810.
[3]	杨晨艺, 李晓妮, 冯希杰, 黄引弟, 裴跟弟. 秦岭北缘断裂带的重要分支——桃川-户县断层的浅部结构与第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 464-483.
[4]	李晓妮, 杨晨艺, 李高阳, 冯希杰, 黄引弟, 李陈侠, 李苗, 裴跟弟, 王万合. 渭河盆地东南缘渭南塬前北侧分支断层的浅部结构及晚第四纪活动[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 484-499.
[5]	张鹏, 汪勇, 范小平, 许奎, 刘嘉彬. 幕府山-焦山断裂镇江段第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 63-75.
[6]	张鹏, 许奎, 范小平, 张媛媛, 汪勇, 郝景润. 镇江地区主要NW向断裂的第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(1): 144-157.
[7]	卢帮华, 王萍, 王慧颖, 赖忠平, 邓志辉, 毕丽思, 王万合. 珠江三角洲西缘西江断裂鹤山—磨刀门段的活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(6): 1370-1384.
[8]	马骏, 周本刚, 王明明, 安力科. 鲜水河断裂带折多塘断裂西北段全新世活动的地质地貌依据[J]. 地震地质, 2020, 42(5): 1021-1038.
[9]	张鹏, 张媛媛, 许汉刚, 刘建达, 陈建强, 李丽梅, 李金良, 顾勤平, 蒋新. 苏锡常断裂的第四纪活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(5): 1172-1184.
[10]	徐良鑫, 卞菊梅, 呼楠, 田勤虎, 田伟新, 段蕊. 骊山山前断裂华清池以西段晚更新世以来的活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2019, 41(3): 561-575.
[11]	赵建明, 李营, 陈志, 刘兆飞, 赵荣琦, 荣伟健. 蔚县-广灵断裂和口泉断裂气体排放和断裂活动性关系[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(6): 1402-1416.
[12]	田一鸣, 刘保金, 石金虎, 王晓谦, 酆少英, 李稳. 南阳盆地朱阳关-夏馆断裂的浅部特征及活动性[J]. 地震地质, 2018, 40(1): 87-96.
[13]	王旭光, 李传友, 吕丽星, 董金元. 龙门山后山断裂中段汶川-茂县断裂的晚第四纪活动性分析[J]. 地震地质, 2017, 39(3): 572-586.
[14]	马兴全, 孙杰, 赵显刚, 王文旭, 蔡颖哲, 万娜. 河套断陷带包头断裂第四纪活动性研究[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(4): 874-884.
[15]	王雷, 沈军, 于晓辉, 万永魁, 尉洋, 邵博, 杨传成. 吉林省松原地区孤店断裂活动性研究[J]. 地震地质, 2016, 38(2): 447-457.