帕米尔高原1895年塔什库尔干地震地表多段同震破裂与发震构造

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.02.002

地震地质 ›› 2011, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 260-276.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.02.002

帕米尔高原1895年塔什库尔干地震地表多段同震破裂与发震构造

李文巧¹, 陈杰¹, 袁兆德¹, 黄明达¹, 李涛¹, 余松^1,2, 杨晓东¹

1. 中国地震局地质研究所,地震动力学国家重点实验室, 北京 100029;
2. 湖北省地震局,武汉地震工程研究院, 武汉 430071

收稿日期:2011-04-19 修回日期:2011-05-18 出版日期:2011-06-29 发布日期:2011-12-17
通讯作者: 陈杰,研究员,E-mail: chenjie@ies.ac.cn。
作者简介:李文巧,男,1978年出生,助理研究员,2004年毕业于中国地震局兰州地震研究所,现为中国地震局地质研究所博士研究生,构造地质专业,电话: 010-62009243,E-mail: lwq 3278@163.com。
基金资助:
科技部国际科技合作计划项目(2008DFA20860)和地震动力学国家重点实验室自主研究课题(LED2010A04)共同资助。

COSEISMIC SURFACE RUPTURES OF MULTI SEGMENTS AND SEISMOGENIC FAULT OF THE TASHKORGAN EARTHQUAKE IN PAMIR,1895

LI Wen-qiao¹, CHEN Jie¹, YUAN Zhao-de¹, HUANG Ming-da¹, LI-Tao¹, YU Song^1,2, YANG Xiao-dong¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics,Institute of Geology,China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China;
2. Earthquake Administration of Hubei Province,Wuhan 430071,China

Received:2011-04-19 Revised:2011-05-18 Online:2011-06-29 Published:2011-12-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于高分辨率卫星影像解译,通过野外地质地貌填图与差分GPS测量,初步获得了帕米尔高原1895年塔什库尔干地震地表破裂带的空间展布、破裂类型、位移及分布等基本参数,据此估算了可能的地震震级,讨论了其宏观震中及发震构造模型。塔什库尔干地震使得慕士塔格正断层南段的部分和整个塔合曼正断层发生破裂,形成了长约27km的地震地表破裂带,破裂带总体走向NNE,由北部的N25°W向南转至N25°E。地表由正向或反向正断层陡坎组成,在剖面上表现为地堑、地垒和阶梯状等构造组合; 在平面上表现为单条雁列型、平行型、收敛(或汇聚)型、"井"字型等。地表破裂带以纯倾滑为主,基本无走滑量,表现为正断层性质。地表破裂带一般宽30～60m,最大可达825m; 单条陡坎垂直位移(4.2±0.2)m,最大同震垂直位移6.8m。地表破裂具有明显的破裂分段特征,由北向南由3条独立的次级破裂段组成。估算其地质矩震级为7.0～7.3级。该断层以东的小盆地内发现了同震感应地表破裂。

关键词: 塔什库尔干地震, 正断层, 地表破裂带, 破裂分段, 发震构造, 帕米尔高原

Abstract:

Based on the interpretation of satellite images,combined with field geomorphic and tectonic investigations and surveys,we get the parameters of surface rupture zones of the 1895 Tashkorgan earthquake,such as the geometry,the types of rupture,the displacements and their distribution and so on.And on these grounds,we estimate the possible magnitude,the epicenter and seismogenic fault of this earthquake.The south segment of Muztag Fault and the whole Taheman Fault were ruptured by the Tashkorgan earthquake.The length of the surface rupture zone is 27km.The rupture zone strikes NNE,and it changes from N25°W in the north to N25°E in the south segment.The surface rupture zone is composed of consequent or obsequent normal fault scarps,represented by horst,graben,and step-like structure on the profile,and distributed in patterns as en echelon,parallel,convergent and parallel cross shaped and so on in the plane.The surface ruptures are dominated by pure dip-slip,with little lateral displacement.The general width of these overlapping surficial fault rupture strands is ca.30～60m, and the largest may come to 825m.The largest co-seismic displacement of a single scarp is 4.2±0.2m. The surface ruptures are composed of three independent secondary segments.The seismogenic fault of this earthquake is Taheman Fault.The south segment of Muztag Fault was also ruptured.Moreover,we find a younger fault scarp which may be induced by the 1895 earthquake in the small basin between the two above-mentioned faults.

Key words: Tashkorgan earthquake, normal fault, surface rupture, rapture segmentation, seismogenic fault, Pamir

中图分类号:

P315.2

李文巧, 陈杰, 袁兆德, 黄明达, 李涛, 余松, 杨晓东. 帕米尔高原1895年塔什库尔干地震地表多段同震破裂与发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2011, 33(2): 260-276.

LI Wen-qiao, CHEN Jie, YUAN Zhao-de, HUANG Ming-da, LI-Tao, YU Song, YANG Xiao-dong. COSEISMIC SURFACE RUPTURES OF MULTI SEGMENTS AND SEISMOGENIC FAULT OF THE TASHKORGAN EARTHQUAKE IN PAMIR,1895[J]. SEISMOLOGY AND GEOLOGY, 2011, 33(2): 260-276.

参考文献

丁国瑜.1996.发震构造确定的原则和方法 .见: 时振梁等著.2004.核电厂地震安全性评价中的地震构造研究.北京: 中国电力出版社.154-180.
DING Guo-yu.1996.Principle and method for determination of seismogenic structure .In: SHI Zhen-liang et al.(eds).2004.Seismotectonic research on the seismic safety assessment of nuclear power ptants.China Electric Power Press,Beijing.154-180(in Chinese).
冯先岳.1997.新疆古地震［M］.乌鲁木齐: 新疆科技卫生出版社.33-34.
FENG Xian-yue.1997.The Paleoearthquakes in Xinjiang Region,China ［M］.Xinjiang Science,Technology and Health Publishing House,Urumchi.33-34(in Chinese).
郑剑东.1993.喀喇昆仑断层与塔什库尔干地震形变带［J］.地震地质,15(2): 107-116.
ZHENG Jian-dong.1993.Karakorum Fault and Tashkorgan seismic deformation zone ［J］.Seismology and Geology,15(2): 107-116(in Chinese).
Arnaud N O,Brunel M,Cantagrel J M,et al.1993.High cooling and denudation rates at Kongur Shan,eastern Pamir(Xinjiang,China)revealed by ⁴⁰ Ar/³⁹ Ar alkali feldspar thermochronology ［J］.Tectonics,12: 1335-1346.
Brunel M,Arnaud N,Tapponnier P,et al.1994.Kongur Shan normal fault: Type example of mountain building assisted by extension(Karakoram Fault,eastern Pamir)［J］.Geology,22: 707-710.
Blisniuk P M,Strecker M R.1996.Kinematics of Holocene normal faulting in the northern Pamir: Eos .In: Transactions,American Geophysical Union,77: F693.
Robinson A C,Yin A,Manning C E,et al.2004.Tectonic evolution of the northeastern Pamir: Constraints from the northern portion of the Cenozoic Kongur Shan extensional system,western China ［J］.Geological Society of America Bulletin,116: 953-973.
Robinson A C,Yin A,Manning C E,et al.2007.Cenozoic tectonics of the NE Pamir,Western China,Implications for the evolution of the western end of the Indo-Asian collision zone ［J］.Geological Society of America Bulletin,119: 882-896.
Seong Y B,Owen L A,Yi C,et al.2009a.Quaternary glaciation of Muztag Ata and Kongur Shan: Evidence for glacier response to rapid climate changes throughout the Late Glacial and Holocene in westernmost Tibet ［J］.Geological Society of America Bulletin, 121: 348-365.doi: 10.1130/B26339.1.
Seong Y B,Owen L A,Yi C,et al.2009b.Geomorphology of anomalously high glaciated mountains at the northwestern end of Tibet: Muztag Ata and Kongur Shan ［J］.Geomorphology,103(2): 227-250.doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.025.
Strecker M R,Frisch W,Hamburger M W,et al.1995.Quaternary deformation in the eastern Pamir,Tadzhikistan,and Kyrgyzstan ［J］.Tectonics,14: 1061-1079.doi:10.1029/95TC00927.
Wesnousky S G.2008.Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: Issues and implications for seismic-hazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture ［J］.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,98(4): 1609-1632.doi:10.1785/0120070111.

[1]	刘白云, 赵莉, 刘云云, 王文才, 张卫东. 2021年5月22日青海玛多M7.4地震余震重新定位与断层面参数拟合[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 500-516.
[2]	赵德政, 屈春燕, 张桂芳, 龚文瑜, 单新建, 朱传华, 张国宏, 宋小刚. 基于InSAR技术的同震形变获取、地震应急监测和发震构造研究应用进展[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(2): 570-592.
[3]	张珂, 王鑫, 杨红樱, 王玥, 徐岩, 李静. 2021年云南漾濞M_S6.4地震序列特征及其发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 231-251.
[4]	吴中海, 白玛多吉, 叶强, 韩帅, 史亚然, 尼玛次仁, 高扬. 西藏阿里阿鲁错地堑系的第四纪活动性、最新同震地表破裂及其地震地质意义[J]. 地震地质, 2023, 45(1): 67-91.
[5]	李传友, 孙凯, 马骏, 李俊杰, 梁明剑, 房立华. 四川泸定6.8级地震--鲜水河断裂带磨西段局部发起、全段参与的一次复杂事件[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(6): 1648-1666.
[6]	张博譞, 郑文俊, 陈杰, 何骁慧, 李启雷, 张冬丽, 段磊, 陈干. 柴达木盆地北部2021年6月16日青海茫崖M_S5.8地震发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(5): 1313-1332.
[7]	姚生海, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 刘炜, 张加庆, 袁建新. 阿木尼克山山前地表破裂带与1962年6.8级地震关系的讨论[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(4): 976-991.
[8]	梁宽, 何仲太, 姜文亮, 李永生, 刘泽民. 2022年1月8日青海门源M_S6.9地震的同震地表破裂特征[J]. 地震地质, 2022, 44(1): 256-278.
[9]	高帆, 韩竹军, 袁仁茂, 董绍鹏, 郭鹏. 滇东南地区小江断裂南段历史滑坡特征及其地震地质意义[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1412-1434.
[10]	梁子晗, 魏占玉, 庄其天, 孙稳, 何宏林. 基于高分辨率地形数据的富蕴M8.0地震地表破裂带精细特征[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(6): 1507-1523.
[11]	姚生海, 盖海龙, 殷翔, 李鑫. 青海玛多M_S7.4地震地表破裂带的基本特征和典型现象[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(5): 1060-1072.
[12]	贾蕊, 张国宏, 解朝娣, 单新建, 张迎峰, 李成龙, 黄自成. 2019年巴基斯坦新米尔普尔M_W6.0地震的同震形变场与断层滑动分布反演[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 600-613.
[13]	赵启光, 孙业君, 黄耘, 杨伟林, 顾勤平, 孟科, 杨浩. 高邮-宝应M_S4.9地震的发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 630-646.
[14]	李传友, 张金玉, 王伟, 孙凯, 单新建. 2021年云南漾濞6.4级地震发震构造分析[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(3): 706-721.
[15]	崔仁胜, 赵翠萍, 周连庆, 陈阳. 2020年1月19日新疆伽师M_S6.4地震序列的活动特征和发震构造[J]. 地震地质, 2021, 43(2): 329-344.

帕米尔高原1895年塔什库尔干地震地表多段同震破裂与发震构造

COSEISMIC SURFACE RUPTURES OF MULTI SEGMENTS AND SEISMOGENIC FAULT OF THE TASHKORGAN EARTHQUAKE IN PAMIR,1895

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价